Climate and social stress implications for security analysis
Download
1 / 15

Climate and Social Stress: Implications for Security Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 146 Views
  • Uploaded on

Climate and Social Stress: Implications for Security Analysis. Committee on Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on Social and Political Stresses Board on Environmental Change and Society NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL 2013 (released November 2012). sample.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Climate and Social Stress: Implications for Security Analysis' - conway


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Climate and social stress implications for security analysis

Climate and Social Stress: Implications for Security Analysis

Committee on Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on Social and Political Stresses

Board on Environmental Change and Society

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL

2013 (released November 2012)


sample

The IPCC Special Report on Managing the Risksof Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation

www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX


Observed global mean temperature changes from 1850 to 2008 relative to 1861 1899
Observed Global Mean Temperature Changes from 1850 to 2008 Relative to 1861-1899

Stott et al. 2010


Jun jul aug temperature anomalies nh land
Jun-Jul-Aug Temperature Anomalies NH Land Relative to 1861-1899

Hansen et al. 2012


Us daily temperature extremes
US Daily Temperature Extremes Relative to 1861-1899

2010 2011 2012

2.3:1 2.7:1 9.0:1

The ratio of record daily highs (red) to record daily lows (blue) at about 1,800 weather stations in the 48 contiguous United States from Jan. 1950 to Sept. 2009. Meehl et al. GRL 2009

Update using NOAA data: Climatecommunication.org thru Jun 18, 2012


Expect to be surprised
Expect Relative to 1861-1899to be surprised

…it is prudent for security analysts to expect climate surprises in the coming decade, including

  • Single events that were once considered rare

  • Simultaneous or sequential conjunctions of events that stress response capacity

  • Shocks to globally integrated systems (e.g., food supply, strategic commodities, public health)

  • Impacts occurring far from triggering events

    The surprises are most likely to result from the interaction of climate events and social circumstances

    Troublesome interactions can be expected to become progressively more serious and more frequent over time, probably at an accelerating rate



Three areas of focus
Three areas of focus of security concern

  • Social and political stresses outside the USA

  • Events that exceed the capacity of affected countries or populations to cope and respond (i.e. disruptive events)

  • Risks that call for action in the coming decade


Some basic conclusions
Some of security concern basic conclusions

  • The overall risk of disruption is determined by the interplay of

    • event severity,

    • exposure of people or valued things, and

    • vulnerability of those people or things, including susceptibility to harm and the effectiveness of coping, response, and recovery

  • Exposure and vulnerability may pertain to the direct effects of a climate event or to effects mediated by globalized systems that support the well-being of the society


Need for stress testing
Need for of security concern stress testing

  • The intelligence community should establish a system of periodic “stress testing” for countries, regions, and critical global systems regarding their ability to manage potentially disruptive climate events of concern

  • Stress tests would focus on potentially disruptive conjunctions of climate events and socioeconomic and political conditions


Recommendations for monitoring
Recommendations for monitoring of security concern

Develop a systematic and enduring whole-of-government strategy for monitoring threats connected to climate change in order to inform choices about reducing vulnerability

  • Build the scientific basis for indicators of climate event risks, exposures, vulnerabilities, and factors linking these to societal and security outcomes

  • Develop and periodically update priorities for high-resolution monitoring

  • Integrate quantitative indicators with traditional analytical methods


Contents of report
Contents of Report of security concern

  • Climate Change as a National Security Concern

  • Climate Change, Vulnerability, and National Security: A Conceptual Framework

  • Potentially Disruptive Climate Events

  • How Climate Events Can Lead to Social and Political Stresses

  • Climate Events and National Security Outcomes

  • Methods for Assessing National Security Threats


Committee membership
Committee Membership of security concern

  • JOHN D. STEINBRUNER (Chair), University of Maryland

  • OTIS B. BROWN, North Carolina State University

  • ANTONIO J. BUSALACCHI, JR., University of Maryland

  • DAVID EASTERLING, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Asheville, NC

  • KRISTIE L. EBI, Stanford University

  • THOMAS FINGAR, Stanford University

  • LEON FUERTH, National Defense University and George Washington University 

  • SHERRI GOODMAN, CNA Analysis and Solutions, Alexandria, VA

  • ROBIN LEICHENKO, Rutgers University

  • ROBERT J. LEMPERT, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA

  • MARC LEVY, Columbia University

  • DAVID LOBELL, Stanford University

  • RICHARD STUART OLSON, Florida International University

  • RICHARD L. SMITH, Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC

  • PAUL C. STERN, Study Director

  • JO L. HUSBANDS, Scholar


ad