Growing unaffordability of health care incremental vs real health care reform
Download
1 / 26

Growing Unaffordability of Health Care: Incremental vs. Real Health Care Reform - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 349 Views
  • Uploaded on

Growing Unaffordability of Health Care: Incremental vs. Real Health Care Reform. John P. Geyman, MD Professor Emeritus- Family Medicine University of Washington, Seattle. Major Problems of Health Care System . Increased Costs Decreased Access Variable Quality

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Growing Unaffordability of Health Care: Incremental vs. Real Health Care Reform' - constance


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Growing unaffordability of health care incremental vs real health care reform l.jpg

Growing Unaffordability of Health Care: Incremental vs. Real Health Care Reform

John P. Geyman, MD

Professor Emeritus- Family Medicine

University of Washington, Seattle


Slide2 l.jpg

Major Problems of Health Care ReformHealth Care System

  • Increased Costs

  • Decreased Access

  • Variable Quality

  • Increased Fragmentation

  • Increased Administrative Burden

  • Technological Imperative

  • Medicolegal Liability

  • System Out of Control


Drivers of health care costs l.jpg
DRIVERS OF HEALTH CARE COSTS Health Care Reform

  • 1.Technological advances

  • 2. Aging of population

  • 3.Increase in chronic disease

  • 4.Inefficiency and redundancy of private insurers

  • 5.Profiteering by investor‑owned companies, facilities and providers

  • 6.Consumer demand

  • 7.Defensive medicine


Slide4 l.jpg

HEALTH CARE COSTS IN U.S. Health Care Reform

• 16.5% of GDP

• $2.1 trillion per year

• Increased cost-shifting to individuals/families

• Incremental “reforms” ineffective


Slide5 l.jpg

Escalating Costs of Care Health Care Reform

  • Double digit increases in health insurance premiums

  • Average family premium now over $10,000 per year

  • 31% of total health costs are administrative

  • HMO rates up by 11.7% in 2007 vs CPI increase of 2-3%


Growing unaffordability of health care l.jpg
GROWING UNAFFORDABILITY Health Care ReformOF HEALTH CARE

• “Medical divide” at about $50,000 annual income

• Median household debt over $100,000

• Median family income $41,000 a year

• Health insurance premiums to consume one-third of average household income by 2010


Underinsurance a growing problem l.jpg
UNDERINSURANCE A GROWING PROBLEM Health Care Reform

  • Average deductible of CDHC/HDHI plans $4,000 a year

  • Blue Cross PPO plan in Massachusetts up to $12,000 deductible

  • Annual caps of limited benefit plans as low as $10,000 (Aetna, Cigna)

  • Profitable industry with little value of coverage


Private health insurance industry in u s l.jpg
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN U.S. Health Care Reform

  • 1,300 companies fragment risk pools

  • Medical underwriting, favorable risk selection

  • $300 billion a year industry

  • Minimal regulation, mostly at state level

  • Average of 80% medical-loss ratios


Slide12 l.jpg

Three Alternatives For Health Care Reform

Health Care Reform

1. Employer mandate

2. Individual mandate (Consumer‑driven health care)

3. Single‑payer system


Slide13 l.jpg

Problems With Health Care Reform

Employer‑Based Approach

1. Only 59 percent of employers provide coverage

2. Trend toward part‑time work force

3. Defined contributions vs. benefits

4. Increasing cost‑sharing and unaffordability

5. Job lock problem

6. Competitive disadvantage in global markets

7. A failed track record (eg., Hawaii)


Slide14 l.jpg

Consumer Choice Health Care Reform(“Individual Mandate”)

• Increasingly popular pro-market “solution”

• Shifts responsibility for coverage from employers to consumers

• Assumes a free market in health care

• Assumes adequate information and options for consumers

• Current examples:

premium support for defined benefits

privatizing of Medicare

medical savings accounts


Slide15 l.jpg

Problems With Option 2 Health Care Reform

• Less service for more cost

• Serves for-profit insurance industry

• Coverage by risk selection

• Limited choice for consumers

• “Bad plans can drive out the good ones”

• Is still the most politically popular and likely


Slide16 l.jpg

Why Incremental "Reforms” Keep Failing Health Care Reform

1. Favorable risk selection by insurers

2. High administrative costs and profiteering

3. No mechanisms to contain costs

4. Fragmentation of risk pools

5. Decreasing access to necessary care

6. Lack of accountability for value and quality


Slide18 l.jpg

Annual Health Insurance Premiums And Household Income, 1996-2025

SOURCE: Reprinted with permission from Graham Center One-Pager. Who will have health insurance in 2025? Am Fam Physician 72(10):1989, 2005


Slide19 l.jpg

Option 3: Single Payer System 1996-2025

  • Socialized insurance, not socialized medicine

  • Universal coverage through National Health Program

  • Eliminates private health insurance industry

  • Hospitals and nursing homes with global budgets

  • Physicians reimbursed by fee-for-service

  • Blend of federal and state government roles


Slide20 l.jpg

Fundamental Features of a Universal Healthcare System 1996-2025

• Everyone included

• Public financing

• Public stewardship

• Global budget

• Public accountability

• Private delivery system


Slide21 l.jpg

What Would a NHP Look Like? 1996-2025

  • Everyone receives a health care card assuring payment for all necessary care

  • Free choice of physician and hospital

  • Physicians and hospitals remain independent and non-profit, negotiate fees and budgets with NHP

  • Local planning boards allocate expensive technology

  • Progressive taxes go to Health Care Trust Fund

  • Public agency processes and pays bills


Slide22 l.jpg

Advantages of National Health Program 1996-2025

• Assured access for all Americans

• Cost savings ($200 billion/year)

• Administrative simplicity

• Decreased overhead (Medicare 3% vs private insurance 15%-26%)

• Distributes risk and responsibility to finance care

• Improves access, costs, and quality of care


Slide26 l.jpg

Problems with Option 3 1996-2025

  • Political acceptance

  • Lobbying by special interest stakeholders

  • Disinformation by media coverage

  • Philosophic concerns about “big government”

  • Denial of ineffectiveness of market-based system


ad