1 / 24

Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

Ultraluminous X-ray Sources. Tim Roberts. ULXs in the interacting galaxy pair NGC 4485/4490 (Gladstone & Roberts 2008 - also poster B.11). A definition. ULX : an X-ray source in an extra-nuclear region of a galaxy with an observed luminosity in excess of 10 39 erg s -1

conan
Download Presentation

Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ultraluminous X-ray Sources Tim Roberts ULXs in the interacting galaxy pair NGC 4485/4490 (Gladstone & Roberts 2008 - also poster B.11)

  2. A definition • ULX: an X-ray source in an extra-nuclear region of a galaxy with an observed luminosity in excess of 1039 erg s-1 • Heterogeneous population - includes some recent supernovae - but bulk of sources are black holes accreting from a secondary star The Antennae - Chandra ACIS Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  3. A new class of black hole? • But Eddington limit for spherical accretion: LEdd ~ 1.3 × 1038 (M/M) erg s-1 hence ULXs contain  10 M compact objects – larger still if accretion sub-Eddington – massive black holes. • Not super-massive BHs (MBH  106M); fall to Galactic centre in a Hubble time due to effects of dynamical friction. • Too massive for stellar remnants (3M  MBH  18M). • Are we observing a new, 102 – 105M “intermediate mass” class of accreting black hole (IMBHs; e.g. Colbert & Mushotzky 1999)? Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  4. X-ray evidence for IMBHs • X-ray spectroscopic evidence – cool accretion discs (Miller et al. 2003). NGC 1313 X-1 T  M-0.25 kTin ~ 0.15 keV → ~ 1000 M BHs c.f. kTin ~ 1 keV for stellar BHs Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  5. LX – kTin relationship • IMBH candidates occupy separate part of parameter space to stellar-mass BHs. • Strong evidence for IMBHs as new class underlying luminous ULXs. From Miller et al. (2004) LX T4 Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  6. Vanishing IMBHs problem • But some problems with IMBHs, most notably… • X-ray luminosity function (XLF), normalised to star formation rate, unbroken over 5 decades. • XLF break at ~ 0.1 LEdd for 1000-M IMBHs. • No other source population switches off at 0.1 LEddlike this. From Grimm, Gilfanov & Sunyaev (2003) Break at ~ 2 × 1040 erg s-1 Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  7. The link with massive stars High mass stars can feed stellar mass black holes at a sufficient rate to produce the extreme X-ray luminosity From Gao et al. (2003) Potential X-ray luminosities for accretion onto a 10 M BH from 2 – 17 M secondaries (Rappaport, Podsiadlowski & Pfahl 2005) Populations of ULXs (10+) detected in bright starbursts - ULXs must be short-lived, so cannot all be IMBHs Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  8. Physical processes • Still need to break the Eddington limit; suggested methods include: • Relativistic beaming (e.g. Körding et al. 2002) • Radiative anisotropy (e.g. King et al. 2001) • Truly super-Eddington discs (e.g. Begelman 2002; Heinzeller & Duschl 2007) • Can combine at least two of the above, e.g. King (2008) - within Rsph local energy release is kept ~ Eddington by driving a bi-conical outflow; so apparent line-of-sight Bolometric luminosity is For beaming factor b and super-Eddington rate M/MEdd . . Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  9. Evidence from our own Galaxy • Super-Eddington luminosities are seen! • GRS 1915+105 has intermittently exceeded LEdd over its ~15 yr outburst (Done et al. 2004) • SS433 is super-critically accreting (perhaps exceeding M/MEdd by >103) - if seen face-on it would be an ULX (Fabrika & Mescheryakov 2001, Poutanen et al. 2007) . . SS433: cartoon showing jet precession & inclination Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  10. A pause for reflection • Dichotomy • X-ray evidence such as extreme luminosities and cool accretion discs point to IMBHs, but… • Other evidence stacking up in favour of smaller black holes. Which one is the correct interpretation? Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  11. X-ray timing – PSDs & break frequency • Break frequencies in PSDs related to black hole mass and accretion rate (McHardy et al. 2006) • But most ULXs show little or no variability power (Feng & Kaaret 2005) • Break feature in NGC 5408 X-1 PDS @ ~3 mHz (Soria et al. 2004; Strohmayer et al. 2007) implies mass of 100 - 1000 M Frequency regime probed by XMM for bright ULXs Adapted from Vaughan et al. (2005) Scaling of break frequencies with mass, assuming accretion at mdotEdd Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  12. ULX QPOs • Two ULXs with known QPOs - both luminous with LX > 1040 erg s-1 • Cannot be beamed • Scaling arguments from Galactic black holes - masses ~100 - 1000 M if in known state (talk by Zampieri; Casella et al. 2008) Double QPO in NGC 5408 X-1 (from Strohmayer et al. 2007) QPO in M82 X-1 (from Strohmayer et al. 2003) Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  13. Ho II X-1: timing Goad et al. 2006 • Ho II X-1 is a good example of a ULX with little variability power - can we explain this using known accretion states? • Not disc-dominated • Insufficient power for high or classic very high states • Energy spectrum not low/hard state • Similar to “χ”-class of GRS 1915+105 in VHS? • Band-limited PSD - but don’t see variability, so must be at high-f MBH < 100 M. EPIC-pn light-curve of Ho II X-1 (0.3 – 6 keV, 100 s binning) Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  14. ULX spectra revisited Stobbart, Roberts & Wilms 2006 • Look at best archival XMM-Newton data • Demonstrate that 2-10 keV spectrum fit by a broken power-law in all of the highest quality data • Invalidates IMBH model - hard component is not a simple power-law Disc Power-law Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  15. ULX spectra vs Galactic black holes from Kubota & Done (2004) • Physical accretion disc plus corona model: cool discs (kT ~ 0.1-0.3 keV), optically-thick coronae ( ~ 5 - 100) • ULXs operate differently to commonblack hole states, but… • “Strong” VHS in XTE J1550-564 (Done & Kubota 2006) • Disc appears cool as its inner regions are obscured by an optically-thick corona. “ultraluminous branch” (from Soria 2007) Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  16. A new, ultraluminous accretion state? • Spectrum defined by apparently cool disc, power-law turning over at > 2 keV. Little or no variability power present. Occurs at extreme accretion rates Low hard state in GX339-4 vs a classic ULX, Ho IX X-1 Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  17. The importance of winds • Hydrodynamical simulations of extreme accretion rates (M >> MEdd) onto stellar-mass black holes - Ohsuga (2006, 2007) • Extreme wind driven - column ~ 3  1024 cm2 at the poles, much higher elsewhere • Explains coronae, lack of variability power, giant nebulae…link to high-Z QSOs, Galactic-scale feedback • • Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  18. Other explanations for spectral break • Kerr disc models (Makishima et al. 2000) • “Slim” accretion discs (e.g. Watarai et al. 2000) • Accretion disc structure changes at highest accretion rates (close to the Eddington limit). • Model disc profile T(r)  r-p; standard disc has p = 0.75, slim disc p = 0.5. • Recent work finds p ~ 0.6 for ULXs (e.g. Tsuneda et al. 2006, Vierdayanti et al. 2006, Mizuno et al. 2007). • Fully comptonised VHS with spectrum modified by ionised fast outflow (Goncalves & Soria 2006). • Common thread: high accretion rate, small black holes (MBH < 100 M). Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  19. A multi-wavelength perspective • Optical - counterparts and “beambags” (cf. Pakull & Grisé 2008) • Bubbles also seen in radio (e.g. Lang et al. 2007) • Spitzer observations of NGC 4490 - AGN-like emission lines from ULXs (Vazquez et al. 2007) • Identified ULX counterparts are blue - OB stars (e.g. Liu et al. 2004, Kuntz et al. 2005) Nebula around Ho IX X-1 (Grise & Pakull 2006) Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  20. New HST imaging of ULXs Roberts, Levan & Goad (2008) - arXiv:0803.4470v1 ACS WFC F606W Early F supergiant? NB. high extinction No counterpart, tho’ very high extinction Consistent with late O or early B star F330W F435WF606W mF606W = 23.9 mF606W > 26 mF606W = 24.9 Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  21. New HST imaging of ULXs (2) ACS WFC F606W Young stellar cluster? (MV ~ 8 - 9) OB Star (odd colours?): U-B ~ -1.4, B-V ~ 0.1 Real ULX, or related to background galaxy? F330W F435WF606W mF606W = 22.0 mF606W = 24.9 mF606W = 25.6 Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  22. Are these really secondary stars? • High LX will affect optical emission; reprocessing in accretion disc becomes more important to optical light as black hole mass increases • Stellar heating: stars may be later types than initial colour IDs suggest (late B, not late O/early B) (Patruno & Zampieri 2008; Copperwheat et al. 2007) - small black holes • Alternatively, IMBHs may be favoured (Madhusudhan et al. 2008) Stellar-mass BHs IMBHs From Madhusudhan et al. (2008) Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  23. The goal: mass functions • Urgency to finding counterparts: race to get first ULX mass function • Best way to resolve mass controversy! He II 4686Å line from accretion disc of NGC 1313 X-2; 300 km s-1 shift (Pakull et al. 2006). Could be used to constrain RV curve, hence constrain ULX black hole mass Radial velocity curve from extragalactic Wolf-Rayet black hole binary IC 10 X-1. Uses He II 4686Å line to constrain mass function, find a black hole mass of ~ 24 - 33 M (Silverman & Filippenko 2008) Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

  24. So, what are ULXs? • Bulk of evidence - few keV X-ray spectral breaks, star formation link etc - argues most ULXs are extreme accretion rate, small (< 100 M) black holes • ULX is an accretion state, not a source class • Cannot rule out some larger IMBHs - NGC 5408 X-1, M82 X-1 and HLXs (with LX > 1041 erg s-1) are the best candidates? • Mass functions are within reach - will resolve the controversy for at least some ULXs Tim Roberts - Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

More Related