Download
1 / 8
80 likes | 213 Views
Alpha Test Site Panel. Spring PRODS Meeting March 4, 2013 LAC+USC Medical Center – Wesley Y. Naritoku Massachusetts General Hospital – W. Stephen Black-Schaffer The Methodist Hospital – Suzanne Z. Powell Vanderbilt Medical Center – Robert D. Hoffman. LAC+USC alpha-test experience.
E N D
Alpha Test Site Panel Spring PRODS Meeting March 4, 2013 LAC+USC Medical Center – Wesley Y. Naritoku Massachusetts General Hospital – W. Stephen Black-Schaffer The Methodist Hospital – Suzanne Z. Powell Vanderbilt Medical Center – Robert D. Hoffman
LAC+USC alpha-test experience • “NAS and Milestones” grand rounds • CCC = PD (ex officio) Assoc PD + 10 faculty members (4 AP, 6 CP including 1 PhD non-MD) • Overcoming inertia with implementation of something new, no previous experience – like first Whipple; more fluid with subsequent meetings • Milestones were identified where our residents wouldn’t achieve level 4; one PROF no progression • Meeting as CCC resulted in greater consistency in evaluation across the residency program • No complaints among residents (doing new self-evaluation) or among faculty participating in CCC
MGH alpha-test experience • CCC = PD + AP and CP Assoc PDs + 2 SrAttendings + 1 Jr Attending (6 Members) • Need to get better alignment between the Milestones and end of rotation evaluations • For several of the Milestones our program presently wouldn't get residents to level 4 • Adding new programmatic elements may be easier because of national standards • Reviewing discordances between CCC and self-assessments is informative
TMH alpha-test experience • Separate presentations on Milestones done for residents and faculty with residents performing self-assessments before faculty • CCC = PD + AP and CP Assoc PDs + 1 SrAttending + 2 Jr Attendings(6 Members) • Each CCC member performed evaluations of all residents individually prior to first meeting of the group • Hardest to assess PGY1’s since the previous experiences of trainees has been different (MD/PhD with research, or post-sophomore fellowship experience) • For several of the Milestones our program presently wouldn't get residents to level 4 – particularly evident in LM (residents self-evals correlate) • Reviewing discordances between CCC and resident self-assessments is informative • Will use resulting data as baseline for further comparisons • New Innovations evaluation form will be changed for use by all faculty to reflect the 29 Milestones
Vandy alpha-test experience • CCC: PD as Chair, plus five members with demonstrated interest in GME, AP and CP represented equally as possible. • Resident self-assessment and CCC assessment blind to one another. • CCC evaluations were often subjective; room to improve objective assessment tools. • Four CCC meetings, one per class. Milestone by Milestone, not Resident by Resident. 12 minutes each resident on the average. • Self-assessments and CCC assessments were mostly concordant. There was more resident- induced- than Milestone-induced discordance .
