Monitoring grocott s policy
1 / 14

Monitoring Grocott’s Policy: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:. Research Team : Thanduxolo Jika Modise Kabeli Thandy Kunene Susan Nakacwa Thando Sebesho. Research Aims:. To identify trends followed in monitoring policy To establish who is better placed for the responsibility of monitoring policy

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:' - cole-pollard

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Monitoring grocott s policy
Monitoring Grocott’s Policy:

Research Team:

  • Thanduxolo Jika

  • Modise Kabeli

  • Thandy Kunene

  • Susan Nakacwa

  • Thando Sebesho

Research aims
Research Aims:

  • To identify trends followed in monitoring policy

  • To establish who is better placed for the responsibility of monitoring policy

  • Provide propositions for monitoring Grocott’s policy

Research methods
Research Methods:

Qualitative research:

  • Interviews

  • E-mails

  • In-depth (open ended) questions


  • Grocott’s does not have a formalized document that outlines who is responsible for monitoring policy

  • Only an arbitrary level of implementation of arbitrary policy decisions exists

  • Readers have been acting as watchdogs e.g. calling-in to complain about something published

Grocott s organogram
Grocott’s Organogram:

Board of Directors

Board of


General Manager




Advisory board
Advisory Board:

Advisory Board Members

Editorial Policy








Policy Awareness

  • Focus Groups

  • Media Campaigns

  • Public Meetings


  • There should be a Qualitative Review of each issue - this will help the editor monitor the quality of the newspaper, especially in the beginning stages.

  • The Review can be as simple as passing a copy of the newspaper to all people responsible for content & production, & asking them to mark criticisms and suggestions on the copy for all to see.

Recommendations continued
Recommendations continued:

Composition of the Advisory Board:

  • Should be representative

    - consist of members with diff. expertise, e.g authorities in the areas of law, finance, education, editorial policy, etc.

    - also, consist of different communities and social orientations in Grahamstown.

Recommendations continued1
Recommendations continued:


Advisory Board (Policy Expert/s):

  • create policy awareness through media campaigns, focus groups & public meetings.

  • Sit-in & mediate on meetings to solve conflict regarding policy matters.

  • Investigate, judge or punish those responsible for lapses

Recommendations continued2
Recommendations continued:



  • clearly define & implement the editorial policy

  • establish procedures to maintain newspaper quality,

  • identify errors & problems,

  • detect trends & monitor possible failures that reflect a deterioration in quality, &

  • implement corrective actions as needed.

Recommendations continued3
Recommendations continued:

Focus groups:

  • gather role players in all sectors for policy input

  • create policy awareness

  • review/assess adherence to policy - e.g. review articles on Grocott’s Mail for policy adherence.

Recommendations continued4
Recommendations continued:

Radio broadcasts and press releases

  • For information broadcasts, awareness campaigns, creating a platform to call public meetings or give reminders e.g Radio Grahamstown, RMR and Grocott’s.

  • The radio stations will be mediums of giving feedback, responses and reminders.

Recommendations continued5
Recommendations continued:

Public meetings

  • large scale meetings in different areas in Grahamstown.

  • should be recorded & have translators available for Xhosa or Afrikaans speakers.

  • Grocott’s Project e.g. GRAB – could use students on a voluntary basis


The Board of Advisors will, on their bi-annual meetings, submit an audit of the qualitative review to the Board of Directors.