1 / 24

The New Frontier: Compliance and Quality

The New Frontier: Compliance and Quality. Alice G. Gosfield, Esq. Alice G. Gosfield and Associates PC 2309 Delancey Place Philadelphia PA 19103 www.gosfield.com. The Problem. IOM: To Err is Human IOM: Crossing the Quality Chasm Leapfrog Group Errors and patient safety

cole-obrien
Download Presentation

The New Frontier: Compliance and Quality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The New Frontier: Compliance and Quality Alice G. Gosfield, Esq. Alice G. Gosfield and Associates PC 2309 Delancey Place Philadelphia PA 19103 www.gosfield.com c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  2. The Problem • IOM: To Err is Human • IOM: Crossing the Quality Chasm • Leapfrog Group • Errors and patient safety • Misuse, underuse and overuse • Concern for green eyeshade values c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  3. Enforcement • Standard approach to breach of conditions of participation • Quality failures as false claims • Nursing homes • Managed care: ‘Promises made but not kept’ c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  4. OIG Work Plan • OIG Work Plan Issues on quality: • Hospital privileging • PRO sanction authority • Home health care quality • Nursing home quality assessment and assurance committees • Family experience with nursing home care • Use of restraints in many settings c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  5. PROs • Basic responsibilities • Whether services are reasonable and medically necessary • Of quality which meets professionally recognized standards • Proposed to be done inpatient could be done in a cheaper facility c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  6. PROs (continued) • Review medical aspects of EMTALA cases • Review beneficiary complaints about quality • Review is binding on claims payers • Recommend sanctions: • Single gross and flagrant violation • Substantial violation in a substantial number of cases c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  7. Exclusions for Quality • Items or services to patients (whether or not eligible for benefits under Medicare or Medicaid) substantially in excess of the patient’s needs • Of a quality which fails to meet professionally recognized standards of health care c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  8. Civil Money Penalties for Quality • Claims for a pattern of medical items or services that a person knows or should know are not medically necessary • Provides false or misleading information that could be expected to lead to premature discharge • Hospital payments to physicians to reduce services c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  9. CMPs (continued) • Physician incentive plans that put physicians at substantial financial risk • HIPAA privacy regulations: quality relevance? • Stark and Kickback violations • EMTALA itself c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  10. Welcome to Wonderland • Recasting Accountability • Why the physician nexus matters • Understanding the doctor-patient essentials • Where have we strayed • Four principles to make quality happen c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  11. Why and How to Focus on Physicians • Physician Centrality • Plenary legal authority • Portal to the system • Their Critical and Fundamental Role to your system (AMA Monograph) • Expertise (Reinertsen’s Axioms) • Explain, predict and change patient futures: the healing relationship c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  12. The Altered Doctor-Patient Relationship • Loss of time and touch • 1-800-nurse-from-hell • Meaningless regulation: E &M codes • False claims risk; CMPs • Exclusions: quality, incentives • Anti-referral laws • Malpractice liability in a non-traditional world • Defensive medicine • The plans get a bye c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  13. Altered Relationship (Continued) • Irrelevant payment systems • Rampant consumerism • Olympic caliber Web surfing • Alternative therapies • Direct to consumer advertising • Burgeoning physician report cards • Shift to disease management approaches • Explosion of knowledge base c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  14. What Makes Physicians Different? • Responsibility for individuals • Accountability for life and death • Legal captain of the ship • Collegiality and “groupiness” • Evidence based, scientific decision-making • Outcomes and quality improvement feedback (the dynamism of medicine) • Due process as the scientific method c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  15. Gosfield’s Unified Field Theory: Escaping the Rabbit Hole • Standardize • Simplify • Make Clinically Relevant • Public Accountability for what they can control c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  16. Clinical Practice Guidelines per the Institute of Medicine • CPGs, Medical Review Criteria, Performance Measures and Standards of Quality • Using good guidelines c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  17. The Theory in Practical Steps: Collaboration • Select a CPG: Better National • Translate into applicable ICD-9 and CPT codes • Note documentation standards: templates • Document full pathway (not just physicians) • Accommodate deviations • Price the services • Measure compliance • Analyze and refine c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  18. Making It Credible to the Physicians • Involve them in the process • Use real leaders • Make their involvement visible • Develop trust: Do what you say; Say what you do • Open, frequent, candid communication: raw data • Recognize the need for group platform • Fair and equitable procedures: the scientific method c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  19. Provides for unified clinical management of patients (simple and standard) Speaks to physicians the way they think (clinically relevant) Creates time for touch and healing Permits credible branding for quality Advantages c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  20. Advantages (Continued) • Lowers fraud and abuse risks for all • Maximizes efficiency without sacrificing quality • Provides a new way to price • Can eliminate intrusive medical management and documentation • Preempts malpractice claims and lowers liability risk c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  21. Potential Disadvantages • There aren’t enough CPGs to make it work • Systems are too cumbersome and expensive to implement • Cookbook medicine doesn’t work • It’s a sword if you don’t follow through c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  22. Conclusion • Compliance is not isolated • There are many people paying the piper • Something meaningful must be done • Physicians are at the core • You can do well by doing good (and right) c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  23. Resources • Gosfield, “Integrating Clinical Guidelines Into Administrative Processes can Lower Risk”, J HC Compliance ( Sept/Oct 1999) pp.9-15 • Reinertsen, “Health Care: Past, Present and Future,” Group Practice Journal (March/April 1997) pp.37-43 • Gosfield, Quality and Clinical Culture: The Critical Role of Physicians in Accountable Health Care Organizations, http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/article/371-477.html c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

  24. Resources (continued) Gosfield, “Legal Mandates for Physician Quality: Beyond Risk Management,” Health Law Handbook, 2001 ed., WestGroup, pp. 285-231 Gosfield, “Making Quality Happen: In Search of Legal Weightlessness,” in 2002 Health Law Handbook , (forthcoming) c. 2002 Alice G Gosfield

More Related