NECC 2007 - SAP126

1. NECC 2007 - SAP126 Program Evaluation Tools and Strategies for Instructional Technology

2. jsun@sun-associates.com • 978-251-1600 ext. 204 • www.sun-associates.com/necc2007 • This presentation is linked to that site along with other resources on program evaluation • In particular, download a copy of the district evaluation workbook available on that page 2

3. Where Do We Stand? • Who’s working on an actual project? • Current? • Anticipated? • Your expectations for today 3

4. Workshop Goals • To review the key elements of effective program evaluation as applied to instructional technology evaluations • To consider evaluation in the context of some example projects 4

5. Why Evaluate? • To fulfill program requirements • Evaluation is part of program/project accountability • Most other state and federal proposals require an evaluation component • And not simply a statement that “we will evaluate” • But actual info on who will evaluate, the evaluation questions, and methodologies • Project sustainability • Generation of new and improved project ideas • Others? 5

6. By Definition, Evaluation… • Is both formative and summative • Helps clarify project goals, processes, products • Should be tied to indicators of success written for your project’s goals • Is not a “test” or simply a checklist of completed activities • Qualitatively, are you achieving your goals? • What adjustments can be made to your project to realize greater success? 6

7. A Three-Phase Evaluation Process • Evaluation Questions • Tied to original project goals • Indicator rubrics • Allow for authentic, qualitative, and holistic evaluation • Data Collection • Tied to indicators in the rubrics • Scoring and Reporting • Role of the evaluation committee 7 pg 5 in workbook

8. Who Evaluates? • Committee of stakeholders (pg 10) • Outside facilitator? • Task checklist (pg 6) • Other issues… • Perspective • Time-intensive 8

9. Project Sample 9

10. An Iterative Process • Evaluation breaks your vision down into increasingly observable and measurable pieces. 10

11. Goals Lead to Questions • What do you want to see happen? • These are your goals • Rephrase goals into questions • Achieving these goals requires a process that can be measured through a formative evaluation 11

12. …And Then to Indicators • What is it that you want to measure? • What are the conditions of success and to what degree are those conditions being met? • By what criteria should performance be judged? • Where should we look and what should we look for to judge performance success? • What does the range in the quality of performance look like? • How should different levels of quality be described and distinguished from each other? 12

13. Indicators should reflect your project’s unique goals and aspirations • Rooted in proposed work • Indicators must reflect your own environment...what constitutes success for you might not for someone else • Indicators need to be highly descriptive and can include both qualitative and quantitative measures • You collect data on your indicators 13

14. Try it on a Sample • Using the Evaluation Logic Map, map your: • Project purpose/vision • Goals • Objectives • Actions • We’ll take 15 minutes for this…and then come back for indicators 14

15. 15

16. 16

17. Next…Indicators • Pick one of your intermediate outcomes • Write a brief statement of what it would LOOK LIKE to achieve ultimate success in this indicator. • What would change (go down) if success was less than ultimate? 17

18. To Summarize... • Start with your proposal or technology plan • Logic map the connections between actions, objectives, and goals • From your goals/objectives, develop evaluation questions • Questions lead to indicators • Indicators are organized into rubrics • Data collection flows from that rubric 18

19. Evidence/Data Collection • Classroom observation, interviews, and work-product review • What are teachers doing on a day-to-day basis to address student needs? • Focus groups and surveys • Measuring teacher satisfaction • Triangulation with data from administrators and staff • Do other groups confirm that teachers are being served? 19

20. Data Collection Basics • Review Existing Data • Current technology plan • Curriculum • District/school improvement plans • Sample quesitons on the webpage for this presentation • www.sun-associates.com/eval/sample 20

21. Surveys • Creating good surveys • Length • Differentiation (teachers, staff, parents, community, etc..) • Quantitative data • Attitudinal data • Timing/response rates (getting returns!) • www.sun-associates.com/eval/samples/samplesurv.html 21

22. Online Survey Tools • Online • VIVED • Profiler • LoTi • Zoomerang • SurveyMonkey.com 22

23. Survey Issues • Online surveys produce high response rates • Easy to report and analyze data • Potential for abuse • Depends on access to connectivity 23

24. Focus Groups/Interviews • Focus Groups/Interviews • Teachers • Parents • Students • Administrators • Other stakeholders 24

25. Classroom Observations • Using an observation template • Using outside observers 25

26. Other Data Elements? • Artifact analysis • A rubric for analyzing teacher and student work? • Solicitation of teacher/parent/student stories • This is a way to gather truly qualitative data • What does the community say about the use and impact of technology? 26

27. Dissemination • Compile the report • Determine how to share the report • School committee presentation • Press releases • Community meetings 27

28. Conclusion • Build evaluation into your technology planning effort • Remember, not all evaluation is quantitative • You cannot evaluate what you are not looking for, so it’s important to — • Develop expectations of what constitutes good technology integration 28

29. More Information • jsun@sun-associates.com • 978-251-1600 ext. 204 • www.sun-associates.com/evaluation • www.edtechevaluation.com 29

30. jsun@sun-associates.com • 978-251-1600 ext. 204 • www.sun-associates.com/necc2007 • This presentation will be linked to that site 30