1 / 65

Λ hypernuclear spectroscopy at Jefferson Lab

Λ hypernuclear spectroscopy at Jefferson Lab. The 3 rd Korea-Japan on Nuclear and Hadron Physics at J-PARC, a t Inha University in Korea 2014/3/20 – 2014/3/21 Graduate school of Science, Tohoku Univ. Toshiyuki Gogami. Contents. Introduction ( e,e’K + ) reaction experiment

cleta
Download Presentation

Λ hypernuclear spectroscopy at Jefferson Lab

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Λ hypernuclearspectroscopy at Jefferson Lab The 3rd Korea-Japan on Nuclear and Hadron Physics at J-PARC, at Inha University in Korea 2014/3/20 – 2014/3/21 Graduate school of Science, Tohoku Univ. Toshiyuki Gogami

  2. Contents • Introduction • (e,e’K+) reaction experiment • JLab E05-115 • Analysis • Energy scale calibration • Binding energy systematic error estimation • Results • 12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB • 7Li(e,e’K+)7ΛHe

  3. Contents • Introduction • (e,e’K+) reaction experiment • JLab E05-115 • Analysis • Energy scale calibration • Binding energy systematic error estimation • Results • 12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB • 7Li(e,e’K+)7ΛHe

  4. Spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K+) reaction pe’ e + p➝ e’ + K+ + Λ e- e’-Spectrometer γ* Coincidence Missing Mass MHY High intensity (~1014 Hz) Small emittance (2μm・mrad) Small energy spread (ΔE/E < 10-4) p K+ Λ n K+-Spectrometer pK+ target nucleus • ~ 1990’s • The (K-,π-) , (π+,K+) reactions • Energy resolution ~ a few MeV • n Λ • 2000~ • The (e,e’K+) reaction • Energy resolution sub-MeV • p  Λ

  5. Spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K+) reaction pe’ e + p➝ e’ + K+ + Λ e- e’-Spectrometer γ* Coincidence Missing Mass MHY High intensity (~1014 Hz) Small emittance (2μm・mrad) Small energy spread (ΔE/E < 10-4) p K+ Λ JLab E05-115 (2009) n K+-Spectrometer pK+ target nucleus • ~ 1990’s • The (K-,π-) , (π+,K+) reactions • Energy resolution ~ a few MeV • n Λ • 2000~ • The (e,e’K+) reaction • Energy resolution sub-MeV • p  Λ

  6. Physics motivation for JLab E05-115 • 7ΛHe • CSB effect in ΛN interaction • Λ Glue like role • 10ΛBe • CSB effect in ΛN interaction • Λ Glue like role • Level inversion due to nuclear deformation • 12ΛB • Consistency confirmation with old data • Finer structures with best resolution • 52ΛV (the first challenge for medium-heavy mass region) • Λ single particle potential

  7. Physics motivation for JLab E05-115 • 7ΛHe • CSB effect in ΛN interaction • Λ Glue like role • 10ΛBe • CSB effect in ΛN interaction • Λ Glue like role • Level inversion due to nuclear deformation • 12ΛB • Consistency confirmation with old data • Finer structures with best resolution • 52ΛV (the first challenge for medium-heavy mass region) • Λ single particle potential

  8. 7ΛHe hyprenucleus Resonant state 6He 7He Λ Bound state α α + n n Unbound Bound n n Λ CSB effect Λ

  9. CSB interaction test in A=7 iso-triplet comparison 7ΛBe Counts 7ΛLi Counts H.Tamura et al., PRL 84, 5963 (2000) α α α n p n Λ p Λ p n Λ Counts 7ΛHe BΛ[MeV]

  10. CSB interaction test in A=7 iso-triplet comparison S.N.Nakamura et al., PRL 110, 012502 (2013) + JLab E01-011 -5.68 ± 0.03 ± 0.25 α α α n p n Λ p Λ p n Λ

  11. 7ΛHe in JLab E05-115 Resonant state S.N.Nakamura et al., PRL 110, 012502 (2013) + • JLab E05-115 • Small systematic error • Observation of the excited state Bound state Unbound Bound CSB effect -BΛ(1/2+) = -5.68 ± 0.03 ± 0.25

  12. Experimental setup Pre-chicane beam line Δp/p ~ 2 × 10-4 Δp/p ~ 2 × 10-4 θe’ = 6.5 ± 5.0 [degree] θK = 5.7 ± 4.6 [degree]

  13. Experimental setup

  14. Experimental setup

  15. Contents • Introduction • (e,e’K+) reaction experiment • JLab E05-115 • Analysis • Energy scale calibration • Binding energy systematic error estimation • Results • 12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB • 7Li(e,e’K+)7ΛHe

  16. Absolute energy scale calibration with Λ andΣ0 Reference plane x, x’, y, y‘ @ RP Backward transfer matrix p, x’, y’ @ Target Target Missing mass

  17. Absolute energy scale calibration with Λ andΣ0 x, x’, y, y‘ @ RP Backward transfer matrix ITERATION Tune p, x’, y’ @ Target Missing mass

  18. Λ,Σ0 comparison Before (Δp/p ~ 10-3) 4 MeV (FWHM) 1.6 MeV (FWHM) After (Δp/p ~10-4) ~ 0.5 MeV (FWHM) for 12ΛB

  19. Λ,Σ0 comparison Before (Δp/p ~ 10-3) 4 MeV (FWHM) How good is the binding energy determined ? (Systematic error) 1.6 MeV (FWHM) After (Δp/p ~10-4) ~ 0.5 MeV (FWHM) for 12ΛB

  20. Systematic error estimation for binding energy ( TOSCA + Geant4 )

  21. Systematic error estimation for binding energy • Realistic • S/N • Yields • Energy straggling in target • Beam raster • Spectrometer acceptance • Detector resolution

  22. Systematic error estimation for binding energy Compare • Realistic • S/N • Yields • Energy straggling in target • Beam raster • Spectrometer acceptance • Detector resolution

  23. Systematic error estimation for binding energy Compare • Realistic • S/N • Yields • Energy straggling in target • Beam raster • Spectrometer acceptance • Detector resolution keV

  24. Contents • Introduction • (e,e’K+) reaction experiment • JLab E05-115 • Analysis • Energy scale calibration • Binding energy systematic error estimation • Results • 12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB • 7Li(e,e’K+)7ΛHe

  25. Definition of differential cross section Number of target nucleus Efficiencies HKS acceptance Number of virtual photon including HES acceptance

  26. 12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB spectrum Preliminary pΛ sΛ

  27. 12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB spectrum (FWHM: 0.5 MeV) Preliminary

  28. D.J.Millener, NPA691, 93 (2001) ① 12ΛC and 12ΛB comparison T.Motoba et al., PTP suppl. 185, 224 (2012) ② A.Matsumura, Doctor’s thesis (2009) ③ (FWHM: 1.4 MeV) 12ΛC 12ΛB (π+,K+) reaction H.Hotch et al., PRC64, 044302 (2001) 12ΛC (FWHM: 0.5 MeV) 12ΛB JLab E01-011 JLab E05-115 KEK E369 Calc. Calc. Preliminary ② ① ③

  29. 12ΛB comparison SΛ pΛ

  30. Results for 7Li(e,e’K+)7ΛHe Resonant state (FWHM: 1.3 MeV) , Bound state Unbound Bound Preliminary CSB effect

  31. Results of 7ΛHe S.N.Nakamura et al., PRL 110, 012502 (2013) JLab E05-115 (Preliminary) JLab E01-011 -5.68 ± 0.03 ± 0.25 α α α n p n , Λ p Λ p n Λ Preliminary

  32. Results of 7ΛHe S.N.Nakamura et al., PRL 110, 012502 (2013) , EΛ

  33. Summary • JLab E05-115 experiment (2009) • Λ, Σ0, 7ΛHe, 9ΛLi, 10ΛBe, 12ΛB and 52ΛV • 12ΛB • Best resolution • Consistent with past experiments • 7ΛHe • 1/2+ with small systematic error • 2+ (core)  3/2+,5/2+ (7ΛHe) was measured

  34. Outlook • Systematic error • Fitting to the histogram • 52ΛV

  35. Backup

  36. 12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB spectrum Count Cross section Virtual photon flux Efficiencies Acceptance

  37. Λ binding energy for 12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB (FWHM: 500 keV) Click to see previous results

  38. 12ΛB comparison SΛ pΛ

  39. 10B(e,e’K+)10ΛBe spectrum Count Cross section Virtual photon flux Efficiencies Acceptance

  40. Λ binding energy for 10B(e,e’K+)10ΛBe Old data (3 points) 8.910.60(1) 8.310.61(1) 9.300.26(2) (FWHM: 780 keV) • T.Cantiwell et al., NPA236 (1974) 445-456 • M.Juric et al., NPB52 (1973)1-30

  41. Λ binding energy for 10B(e,e’K+)10ΛBe Old data (3 points) 8.910.60(1) 8.310.61(1) 9.300.26(2) Motoba’s calc. (FWHM: 780 keV) -8.84 without CSB -8.76 with CSB Hiyama’s calc.

  42. 7Li(e,e’K+)7ΛHe spectrum Count Cross section Virtual photon flux Efficiencies Acceptance

  43. Missing mass spectra • 9Be(e,e’K+)9ΛLi • 52Cr(e,e’K+)52ΛV

  44. 9Be(e,e’K+)9ΛLi spectrum Count Cross section Virtual photon flux Efficiencies Acceptance

  45. 9Be(e,e’K+)9ΛLi spectrum

  46. 9Be(e,e’K+)9ΛLi spectrum M.Sotonaand S.Frullani, PTP supplement No.117 (1994)

  47. 9Be(e,e’K+)9ΛLi spectrum rough comparison J.J.LeRose et al., NPA804(2008)116-124 F.Cusanno et al., NPA835(2010)129-135 Hall-A Hall-A Hall-C Hall-C

  48. Missing mass spectrum of 52Cr (e,e’K+)52ΛV JLab E05-115 52Cr (e,e’K+)52ΛV sΛ(?) Accidental background

  49. Missing mass spectrum of 52Cr (e,e’K+)52ΛV JLab E05-115 52Cr (e,e’K+)52ΛV Accidental background

  50. Missing mass spectrum of 52Cr (e,e’K+)52ΛV JLab E05-115 52Cr (e,e’K+)52ΛV Accidental background

More Related