1 / 67

Part I Demo Information

Comprehensive Study Educational Conditions and Academic Performance A Focus on Male African American Students Presentation at Board Special Meeting Gongshu Zhang, Ed. D. Chief Accountability and Research Officer, GCSNC June 23, 2008. Part I Demo Information.

Download Presentation

Part I Demo Information

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comprehensive StudyEducational Conditions and Academic PerformanceA Focus on Male African American StudentsPresentation at Board Special MeetingGongshu Zhang, Ed. D. Chief Accountability and Research Officer, GCSNCJune 23, 2008 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  2. Part IDemo Information GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  3. GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  4. Percentage of Student Population Among Total of 72555Grades K to 12 by February, 2008 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  5. Percentage of Student Population by GenderGrades K to 12 by February, 2008 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  6. Percentage of Male Students – Parent Education Levels2006 Data (2006 was the last year DPI collected this data) GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  7. Percentage of FRL Male Students Grades K to 12 by the End of 2006-07 School Year GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008 7

  8. Percentage of Male SWDGrades K to 12 by February, 2008 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008 8

  9. Percentage of Male SWD Classifications GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008 9

  10. Percentage of Male Student: LEPData of February, 2008 10 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  11. Percentage of AIG Male StudentsData of February 2008 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008 11

  12. Percentage of Male Students: AIG Reading and MathData of 2007 12 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  13. Summary I AA students and White students have almost same percentages of population, both slightly over 40. Like all ethnic groups, male AA students have slightly larger population than females, about 51% vs. 49% The percentage in FRL of male AA students is four times the percentage of Male White: 64.7 vs. 15.9. Male AA students have higher percentage with identified SWD than male White: 21.6 vs. 17.3, especially in categories of Specific learning disabled, developmentally delayed, educable mentally disabled, and behaviorally-emotionally disabled: 7.5 vs. 5.8, 1.4 vs. 0.6, 1.3 vs. 0.5, & 1.3 vs. 0.6 correspondingly. Male AA students have significantly lower percentage being identified as AIG than male White: 5.1 vs. 28.6 in reading and 5.9 vs. 30.3 in math. In terms of parent education level, male AA students’ parents have higher percentage in high school/below than male White parents: 52.2 vs. 26.3, and lower percentage in college/above: 23.2 vs. 54.8. GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  14. Part II Schooling and Educational Conditions Study GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  15. GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  16. Percentage of K-12 Male Students: Stability Percentage of students in membership in GCS on the 20th school day who remained in GCS for 160 or more days during a given school year GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  17. Percentage of Male Students Repeating a Grade: Elementary School 425 47 172 694 121 26 18 255 113 14 70 219 # of (ethnicity) (gender) students who repeated a grade/course total # of (ethnicity) (gender) Elem/MS/HS students GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  18. Percentage of Male Students Repeating a Grade: Middle School 178 7 71 269 37 4 20 67 37 1 53 10 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  19. Percentage of Male Students Repeating EOC Course: High School 484 29 202 771 621 56 261 1008 725 85 276 1169 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  20. Percentage of Male Students Suspended One or More Days: Middle School 92 1610 69 589 2362 1479 100 460 2173 1237 404 1858 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  21. Percentage of Male Students Suspended One or More Days: High School 82 109 507 1276 34 665 2062 1308 556 2045 1330 2067 # of (ethnicity) (gender) suspended students (unduplicated) total # of (ethnicity) (gender) MS/HS students GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  22. Percentage of Male Students Who Dropped Out of High School 243 20 110 402 275 31 127 463 236 28 141 449 numerator: # of (ethnicity) (gender) students who dropped out of HS denominator: [(1st month membership grades 9-12 reporting year - initial enrollees + 1st month membership grades 9-12 current year)/2] + # of (ethnicity) (gender) students who dropped out of HS GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  23. True 9th Grade Cohort Graduation Rate of Male Students: 2007 vs. 2006 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  24. Summary II-(1) Male AA students have significantly lower percentage of stability than male White: 85.8 vs. 93.3 in 2006-07. Although the percentage of repeating a grade for male AA has significantly reduced from 2002 to 2007 in elementary and middle schools, the percentage of repeating a course for male AA in high schools is still much higher than male White: 17.5 vs. 5.8. Although the percentage of suspension of one/more days for male AA has significantly reduced from 2003 to 2007, it is still significantly higher than male White: 34.8 vs. 12.1 in middle schools and 32.0 vs. 10.6 in high schools in 2007. The percentage of male AA students who dropped out of high school is still almost twice as high as male White: 4.88 vs. 2.76 in 2007. Based on true 9th grade cohort graduation rate, the rate of GCS male AA was significantly higher than the rate of state all male: 67.5 vs. 65.1 in 2007. However, the rate was significantly lower than GCS male White: 67.5 vs. 83.8. GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  25. GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  26. Percentage of Pre-K Male Students(includes Montessori Pre-K and EC Pre-K students) 131 133 321 294 150 143 495 530 numerator: # of (ethnicity) (gender) Pre-K students denominator: total # of (gender) Pre-K students GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  27. Percentage of K-8 Male Students Attending Magnet Schools 1329 238 666 2233 1175 190 635 2000 1380 262 682 2324 numerator: # of (ethnicity) (gender) magnet students denominator: total # of (ethnicity)(gender) K-8 students GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  28. Percentage of 3rd-12th grade Male Students at AL Program 748 4981 575 66 3276 4235 153 3587 723 157 3390 4777 numerator: # of (ethnicity) (gender) AL students denominator: total # of (ethnicity) (gender) 3rd-12th grade students GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  29. Percentage of Male High School Students Taking One or More AP Exams 994 196 34 1318 235 36 1109 1523 269 67 1255 1760 numerator: # of (ethnicity) (gender) students who took one or more AP exams denominator: total # of (ethnicity) (gender) HS students GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  30. Percentage of Male High School Students Who Took the PSAT (The PSAT is not administered to students enrolled in Algebra I) 1750 196 2965 5317 2429 349 3266 6585 2438 377 3070 6424 numerator: # of (ethnicity) (gender) students who took the PSAT denominator: total # of (ethnicity) (gender) 9th - 11th grade students GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  31. Percentage of Male Seniors Who Took the SAT 273 27 656 1031 351 42 710 1199 394 46 754 1328 numerator: # of (ethnicity)(gender)12th grade students who took the SAT denominator: total # of (ethnicity)(gender) 12th grade students GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  32. Percentage of Male Students at Elementary ACES Programs 1019 89 1083 2356 numerator: # of (ethnicity) (gender) ACES students denominator: total # of (ethnicity) (gender) K-5 students GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  33. Grades 3-5 Male Students: Homework-Time Spent per Week 2005-06 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  34. Grades 6-8 Male Students: Homework-Time Spent per Week 2005-06 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  35. Grades 3-5 Male Students: TV Watched Each School Day 2005-06 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  36. Grades 6-8 Male Students: TV Watched Each School Day 2005-06 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  37. Summary II-(2) Male AA students have a significantly higher percentage in GCS pre-k program than male White. Among all pre-k students they are 46.2 vs. 27.4. The percentage of male AA students in the magnet programs has increased since 2005. It is twice as high as male White: 13.6 vs. 6.8 in 2008. The percentage of male AA students in the AL programs is far below male White: 6.3 vs. 29.6 in 2008. Also, the percentage of male AA students who took one or more AP exams is far below male White: 6.5 vs. 26.3 in 2008. Although the percentages of male AA who took PSAT and SAT have increased since 2004, they were still lower than male White: 64.2 vs. 79.2 in PSAT and 53.8 vs. 65.7 in SAT in 2007. In terms of big difference in percent FRL between male AA and White, male AA have lower percentage than male White at elementary ACES programs: 15.3 vs. 16.5 in 2008. Both AA and White males have low percentages of doing home-work over 3 hours per week: 33 & 46 in grade 3-5 and, especially, 15 & 27 in grade 6-8. Both AA and White males have high percentages of watching TV over 3 hours per day: 49 vs. 32 in grade 3-5 and 60 vs. 33 in grade 6-8 roughly. GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  38. Teacher Quality: Percent of Teachers in Each CategoryStudents of Color in Elementary Schools: More than 75% (1) vs. Less than 25% (2) An average was taken from percentages reported on the NC School Report Cards GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  39. Teacher Quality: Percent of Teachers in Each CategoryStudents of Color in Middle & High Schools: More than 75% (1) vs. Less than 25% (2) GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  40. Number of Teachers per School Receiving National Board Certification Students of Color in Elementary Schools: More than 75% (1) vs. Less than 25% (2) GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  41. Number of Teachers per School Receiving National Board Certification Students of Color in Middle & High Schools: More than 75% (1) vs. Less than 25% (2) GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  42. Teacher Turnover RateStudents with Color in Elementary Schools: More than 75% (1) vs. Less than 25% (2) GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  43. Teacher Turnover RateStudents with Color in Middle & High Schools: More than 75% (1) vs. Less than 25% (2) GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  44. Principal Turnover Rate: Percentage Over Four School Years (2003-04 through 2006-07) An average was taken from # of principal changes GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  45. Summary II-(3) In terms of teacher quality and turnover rate, for comparing school group (1) concentrated students with color (over 75%) and school group (2) with less students with color (below 25%): • overall, group (1) has higher percentage in lateral entry teachers and teachers with few years (0-3) of experience, and lower percentage in advanced degree teachers and teachers with over 10 years of experience than group (2). • Group (1) has less number of teachers with National Board of Certification. • Group (1) has significantly higher turnover rate than group (2): 27.7 vs. 20.4 in elementary schools, and 42.1 vs. 28.3 in middle and high schools. • During a 4-year period, in terms of principal turnover rate: • Both groups have low percentages of schools with no principal change. • Group (1) has higher percentage of schools with one change: 62.2 vs. 41.7. • Group (2) has a higher percentage of schools with 2-3 changes 25 vs. 16.2. GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  46. Part III Longitudinal Study on Academic Performance GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  47. GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  48. EOG Reading Percentage Proficiency: All Students - Grade 3 to Grade 8 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  49. EOG Reading Mean T Score: All Students - Grade 3 to Grade 8 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

  50. EOG Math Percentage Proficiency: All Students - Grade 3 to Grade 8 GCS Comprehensive Study June 2008

More Related