1 / 9

Romantic desirability, self-esteem and relationship behaviour in women

Romantic desirability, self-esteem and relationship behaviour in women . Dr Chris Bale Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences University of Huddersfield c.bale@hud.ac.uk. Sociometer Theory. Leary & Baumeister (2000). Functional, evolutionary explanation of self-esteem.

clare
Download Presentation

Romantic desirability, self-esteem and relationship behaviour in women

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Romantic desirability, self-esteem and relationship behaviour in women Dr Chris Bale Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences University of Huddersfield c.bale@hud.ac.uk

  2. Sociometer Theory • Leary & Baumeister (2000). • Functional, evolutionary explanation of self-esteem. • Self-esteem functions as an interpersonal monitor of: • the quality and quantity of existing relationships, • perceived eligibility for relationships, • and motivates individuals to act accordingly.

  3. Self-esteem and relational behaviour • Limited and inconsistent evidence on the relationship between self-esteem and relational behaviour (Baumeister et al, 2003). • Self report studies. • Experimental studies (e.g. Heatherton & Vohs, 2000). • Dependency Regulation perspective (Murray et al, 2006) • Individuals with low self-esteem are especially sensitive to rejection. • They often react to this by denigrating and emotionally distancing themselves from their partners. • How do individuals behave in the absence of relational threats?

  4. Aims and predictions • The current study examined relationships between women’s: • Self-esteem. • Self-reported relational behaviour. • Perceptions of their own and their partners’ relational desirability. • Sociometer theory suggests low SE should predict more positive relational behaviour. • Equity Theory (Thibaut & Kelly, 1959) suggests lower relative desirability should predict more positive behaviour.

  5. Method 192 women aged 18-60 (mean = 27.2) engaged in long term relationships (> 3 months, mean = 5 years) completed online measures of: Self-esteem: SES (Rosenberg, 1965) & PEI (Shrauger & Schohn, 1995). Relational desirability: MVI (Kirsner et al, 2003) Self & Partner. Relational behaviour: MRI (Buss, 1988) & PSII (Ellis, 1998).

  6. Results After controlling for age and length of relationship: • Self–esteem (SES) did not significantly predict relational behaviour. • Scores on the PEI weakly negatively predicted scores on the MRI (r2 = .05, p<.05). • Relative desirability significantly negatively predicted partner investment behaviour (r2 = .27, p<.05).

  7. Discussion • Self-esteem does not predict relational behaviour. • No evidence for either the Sociometer or Dependency Regulation perspectives. • Women who feel less desirable than their partners report investing more in them. • Correlational results suggest this is largely driven by perceptions of their partners. • Limitations of self-report. • Previous studies show self reports of relational behaviour correlate with partner reports.

  8. Future directions Use implicit measures of desirability and self-esteem to address limitations of self-report. Conduct diary and experimental studies to examine causal effects. Do perceived desirability and self-esteem predict relational behaviour in men? Implications for intimate partner violence and abuse. How effective are different behaviours in maintaining long term relationships?

  9. Thanks for your attention Thanks for your attention. Chris Bale c.bale@hud.ac.uk

More Related