1 / 32

Depth-First Ordering Efficiency of Iterative Algorithms Reducible Flow Graphs

Flow Graph Theory. Depth-First Ordering Efficiency of Iterative Algorithms Reducible Flow Graphs. Jeffrey D. Ullman Stanford University. Roadmap. Proper ordering of nodes of a flow graph speeds up the iterative algorithms: “ depth-first ordering .”

cisco
Download Presentation

Depth-First Ordering Efficiency of Iterative Algorithms Reducible Flow Graphs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Flow Graph Theory Depth-First OrderingEfficiency of Iterative AlgorithmsReducible Flow Graphs Jeffrey D. Ullman Stanford University

  2. Roadmap • Proper ordering of nodes of a flow graph speeds up the iterative algorithms: “depth-first ordering.” • “Normal” flow graphs have a surprising property --- “reducibility” --- that simplifies several matters. • Outcome: few iterations “normally” needed.

  3. Depth-First Search • Start at entry. • If you can follow an edge to an unvisited node, do so. • If not, backtrack to your parent(node from which you were visited). • Constructs a Depth-First Spanning Tree: • Root = entry. • Tree edges are the edges along which we first visit the node at the head.

  4. Example: DFST 1 4 2 5 3

  5. Depth-First Node Order • The reverse of the order in which a DFS retreats from the nodes. • Alternatively, reverse of postorder traversal of the tree.

  6. Example: DF Order 1 2 4 3 5

  7. Four Kinds of Edges • Tree edges. • Forward edges(node to proper descendant). • Retreating edges(node to ancestor). • Includes a self-loop. • Cross edges(between two nodes, neither of which is an ancestor of the other.

  8. A Little Magic • Of these edges, only retreating edges go from high to low in DF order. • Example of proof: You must retreat from the head of a tree edge before you can retreat from its tail. • Also surprising: all cross edges go right to left in the DFST. • Assuming we add children of any node from the left.

  9. Retreating Forward Cross Example: Non-Tree Edges 1 2 4 3 5

  10. Roadmap • “Normal” flow graphs are “reducible.” • “Dominators” needed to explain reducibility. • In reducible flow graphs, loops have single entry points, and retreating edges are independent of the DFST chosen (and called “back” edges). • Leads to relationship between DF order and efficient iterative algorithm.

  11. Dominators • Node ddominatesnode n if every path from the entry to n goes through d. • Text has a forward-intersection iterative algorithm for finding dominators. • Quick observations: • Every node dominates itself. • The entry dominates every node.

  12. Example: Dominators {1} 1 2 {1,2} 4 {1,4} 3 5 {1,2,3} {1,5}

  13. Common Dominator Cases • The test of a while loop dominates all blocks in the loop body. • The test of an if-then-else dominates all blocks in either branch.

  14. Back Edges • An edge is a back edgeif its head dominates its tail. • Theorem: Every back edge is a retreating edge in every DFST of every flow graph. • Converse almost always true, but not always. Head reached before tail in any DFST Note: We assume all nodes are reachable from the entry, or else they can be deleted from the flow graph. Back edge Search must reach the tail before retreating from the head, so tail is a descendant of the head

  15. Example: Back Edges {1} 1 2 {1,2} 4 {1,4} 3 5 {1,2,3} {1,5}

  16. Reducible Flow Graphs • A flow graph is reducibleif every retreating edge in any DFST for that flow graph is a back edge. • Testing reducibility: Remove all back edges from the flow graph and check that the result is acyclic. • Hint why it works: All cycles must include some retreating edge in every DFST. • In particular, the edge that enters the first node of the cycle that is visited.

  17. DFST on a Cycle So this is a retreating edge Search must reach these nodes before leaving the cycle Depth-first search reaches here first

  18. Example: Remove Back Edges 1 2 4 3 5

  19. Example: Remove Back Edges 1 2 4 3 5 Remaining graph is acyclic.

  20. Why Reducibility? • Folk theorem: All flow graphs in practice are reducible. • Fact: If you use only while-loops, for-loops, repeat-loops, if-then(-else), break, and continue, then your flow graph is reducible.

  21. A A B C In any DFST, one of these edges will be a retreating edge. C B Example: Nonreducible Graph A B C But no heads dominate their tails, so deleting back edges leaves the cycle.

  22. Why Care About Back/Retreating Edges? • Proper ordering of nodes during iterative algorithm assures number of passes limited by the number of “nested” back edges. • Depth of nested loops upper-bounds the number of nested back edges.

  23. DF Order and Retreating Edges • Suppose that for a RD analysis, we visit nodes during each iteration in DF order. • The fact that a definition d reaches a block will propagate in one pass along any increasing sequence of blocks. • When d arrives at the tail of a retreating edge, it is too late to propagate d from OUT to IN. • The IN at the head has already been computed for that round.

  24. Example: DF Order Definition d is Gen’d by node 2 not killed anywhere. The first pass d 1 The second pass d d d 2 4 d d d d 3 5 d d

  25. Depth of a Flow Graph • The depthof a flow graph with a given DFST and DF-order is the greatest number of retreating edges along any acyclic path. • For RD, if we use DF order to visit nodes, we converge in depth+2 passes. • Depth+1 passes to follow that number of increasing segments. • 1 more pass to realize we converged.

  26. retreating retreating increasing increasing increasing Example: Depth = 2 Pass 2 Pass 1 Pass 3

  27. Similarly . . . • AE also works in depth+2 passes. • Unavailability propagates along retreat-free node sequences in one pass. • So does LV if we use reverse of DF order. • A use propagates backward along paths that do not use a retreating edge in one pass.

  28. In General . . . • The depth+2 bound works for any monotone framework, as long as information only needs to propagate along acyclic paths. • Example: if a definition reaches a point, it does so along an acyclic path.

  29. Why Depth+2 is Good • Normal control-flow constructs produce reducible flow graphs with the number of back edges at most the nesting depth of loops. • Nesting depth tends to be small.

  30. Example: Nested Loops 3 nested while- loops; depth = 3. 3 nested repeat- loops; depth = 1

  31. Natural Loops • The natural loopof a back edge a->b is bplus the set of nodes that can reach a without going through b. • Theorem: two natural loops are either disjoint, identical, or one is contained (nested) within the other. • Thus, for reducible flow graphs, the nesting structure of loops is well defined.

  32. Natural loop of 5 -> 1 Natural loop of 3 -> 2 Example: Natural Loops 1 2 4 3 5

More Related