1 / 25

Scoring Matrices

Scoring Matrices. June 21, 2007 Learning objectives- Understand how scoring matrices are constructed. Workshop-Use different BLOSUM matrices in the Dotter Program to determine their effects on output when comparing squid p53 and human p53.

ciqala
Download Presentation

Scoring Matrices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Scoring Matrices • June 21, 2007 • Learning objectives- Understand how scoring matrices are constructed. • Workshop-Use different BLOSUM matrices in the Dotter Program to determine their effects on output when comparing squid p53 and human p53. • Create your own scoring matrix and use it to compare two protein sequences. Explain to the instructor the rationale behind your scoring matrix.

  2. Global Alignment vs. Local Alignment Global Needleman-Wuncsh Method Local Smith-Waterman FastA BLAST

  3. Scoring Matrices • Scoring matrices appear in all analyses involving sequence comparisons. • Scoring matrices implicitly represent a particular theory of relationships. • Understanding theories underlying a given scoring matrix can aid in making proper choice of scoring matrix.

  4. Scoring Matrices When we consider scoring matrices, we encounter the convention that matrices have numeric indices corresponding to the rows and columns of the matrix. For example, M12 refers to the entry at the first row and the second column. In general, Mij refers to the entry at the ith row and the jth column.

  5. Two major scoring matrices for amino acid sequence comparisons • PAM-derived from sequences known to be closely related (Eg. Chimpanzee and human). Generally ranges from PAM 1 to PAM 500 • BLOSUM-derived from sequences not closely related (Eg. E. coli and human). Ranges from BLOSUM 10-BLOSUM 100

  6. The Point-Accepted-Mutation (PAM) model of evolution and the PAM scoring matrix • Started by Margaret Dayhoff, 1978 • A series of matrices describing the extent to which two amino acids have been interchanged in evolution • PAM 1 scoring matrix was obtained by aligning very similar sequences. Other PAMs were obtained by mathematical extrapolation Dayhoff, M. O., Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure Natl. Biomed. Res. Found., Silver Spring MD, 1978.

  7. Protein families used to construct Dayhoff’s scoring matrix ProteinPAMs per 100 mil yrs IgG kappa C region 37 Kappa casein 33 Serum Albumin 26 Cytochrome C 0.9 Histone H3 0.14 Histone H4 0.10

  8. Calculation of relative mutability of amino acid • Find frequency of amino acid change at a certain position in protein. • Divide this “change frequency” by the frequency that the amino acid occurs in all proteins. This gives the mutability of the amino acid. • Multiply the alanine mutability by a factor to get the value 100. • Multiply the 19 other a.a. mutabilities by the same factor. • Result: Relative Mutabilities

  9. Asn 134 Ser 120 Asp 106 Glu 102 Ala 100 Thr 97 Ile 96 Met 94 Gln 93 Val 74 His 66 Arg 65 Lys 56 Pro 56 Gly 49 Tyr 41 Phe 41 Leu 40 Cys 20 Trp 18 Relative mutabilities of amino acids

  10. Why are the mutabilities different? • High mutabilities because a similar amino acid can replace it. (Asp for Glu) • Conversely, the low mutabilities are unique, can’t be replaced.

  11. Tally all pairwise replacements • Next, tally replacements "accepted" by natural selection, in all pair-wise sequence comparisons.

  12. Numbers of accepted point mutations, multiplied by 10 A R N D C Q E G H I L K M F P S T W Y V A R 30N 109 17D 154 0 532C 33 10 0 0Q 93 120 50 76 0E 266 0 94 831 0 422G 579 10 156 162 10 30 112H 21 103 226 43 10 243 23 10I 66 30 36 13 17 8 35 0 3L 95 17 37 0 0 75 15 17 40 253K 57 477 322 85 0 147 104 60 23 43 39M 29 17 0 0 0 20 7 7 0 57 207 90F 20 7 7 0 0 0 0 17 20 90 167 0 17P 345 67 27 10 10 93 40 49 50 7 43 43 4 7S 772 137 432 98 117 47 86 450 26 20 32 168 20 40 269T 590 20 169 57 10 37 31 50 14 129 52 200 28 10 73 696W 0 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 13 0 0 10 0 17 0Y 20 3 36 0 30 0 10 0 40 13 23 10 0 260 0 22 23 6V 365 20 13 17 33 27 37 97 30 661 303 17 77 10 50 43 186 0 17 Original amino acids Replacement amino acids

  13. Creation of a mutation probability matrix • Used accepted point mutation data from previous slide and the mutability of each amino acid to create a mutation probability matrix. • Mij=(mj*Aij)/(sum_over_all_i Aij) • Mij shows the probability that an original amino acid j (in columns) will be replaced by amino acid i (in rows) over a defined evolutionary interval. For PAM 1, an average of 1% of aa’s were changed.

  14. PAM1 mutational probability matrix Orig. aa Values of each column will sum to 10,000 Replacement aa

  15. The Point-Accepted-Mutation (PAM) model of evolution and the PAM scoring matrix A k-PAM unit is equivalent to k 1-PAM unit evolution (or Mk). Example 1: …CNGTTDQVDKIVKILNEGQIASTDVVEVVVSPPYVFLPVVKSQLRPEIQV… |||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| …CNGTTDQVDKIVKIRNEGQIASTDVVEVVVSPPYVFLPVVKSQLRPEIQV… length = 100 1 Mismatch PAM distance = 1

  16. The Point-Accepted-Mutation (PAM) model of evolution and the PAM scoring matrix Observed % aa Difference Evolutionary Distance in PAMs 1 5 10 20 40 50 60 70 80 1 5 11 23 56 80 112 159 246

  17. Final Scoring Matrix is the Log-Odds Score Matrix S (a,b) = 10 log10(Mab/Pb) Replacement amino acid Original amino acid Frequency of amino acid b Mutational probability matrix number S(a,alanine) = 10 log(0.13/0.087)=1.7 (round to 2)

  18. At this evolution- ary difference there is a 13% chance that the second sequence will also have an alanine.

  19. Summary of PAM Scoring Matrix • PAM = a unit of evolution (1 PAM = 1 point mutation/100 amino acids) • Accepted Mutation means fixed point mutation • Comparison of 71 groups of closely related proteins yielding 1,572 changes. (>85% identity) • Different PAM matrices are derived from the PAM 1 matrix by matrix multiplication. • The matrices are converted to log odds matrices.

  20. BLOSUM Matrix (BLOcks SUbstitution Matrices) • Blocks Sum-created from BLOCKS database • A series of matrices describing the extent to which two amino acids are interchangeable in conserved structures of proteins • The number in the series represents the threshold percent similarity between sequences, for consideration for calculation (Eg. BLOSUM62 means 62% of the aa’s were similar)

  21. BLOSUM • BLOSUMs are built from distantly related sequences within conserved blocks of sequences • BLOSUMs are built from the BLOCKS database (the BLOCKS database is a secondary database that derives information from the PROSITE Family database)

  22. BLOSUM (cont.1) • Version 8.0 of the Blocks Database consists of 2884 blocks based on 770 protein families documented in PROSITE. Hypothetical entry in red box in BLOCK record: AABCDA...BBCDA DABCDA.A.BBCBB BBBCDABA.BCCAA AAACDAC.DCBCDB CCBADAB.DBBDCC AAACAA...BBCCC

  23. Building BLOSUM Matrices 1. To build the BLOSUM 62 matrix one must eliminate sequences that are identical in more than 62% of their amino acid sequences. This is done by either removing sequences from the BLOCK or by finding a cluster of similar sequences and replacing the cluster with a single representative sequence. 2. Next, the probability for a pair of amino acids to be placed in the same column is calculated. In the previous page this would be the probability of replacement of A with A, A with B, A with C, and B with C. This gives the value qij 3. Next, one calculates the frequency that the replacement amino acid exists in nature, fi.

  24. Building BLOSUM Matrices (cont.) 4. Finally, we calculate the log odds ratio si,j= log2 (qij/fi). This value is entered into the matrix. Which BLOSUM to use? BLOSUM Identity 80 80% 62 62% (usually default value) 35 35% If you are comparing sequences that are very similar, use BLOSUM 80.

  25. PAM-1 BLOSUM-100 Small evolutionary distance High identity within short sequences Which Scoring Matrix to use? PAM-250 BLOSUM-20 • Large evolutionary distance • Low identity within long sequences

More Related