1 / 19

Print & Online Products to be Produced by AAAS AGEP REC Grant and Other Follow up Activities

Print & Online Products to be Produced by AAAS AGEP REC Grant and Other Follow up Activities. PhD Info Brief already produced For JAM (June 2009) ***New Enrollees & Overall Enrollees Briefs ***Info Brief that highlights Top PhD Producers for 2007/08 By December 2009

cindy
Download Presentation

Print & Online Products to be Produced by AAAS AGEP REC Grant and Other Follow up Activities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Print & Online Products to be Produced byAAAS AGEP REC GrantandOther Follow up Activities

  2. PhD Info Brief already produced • For JAM (June 2009) ***New Enrollees & Overall Enrollees Briefs ***Info Brief that highlights Top PhD Producers for 2007/08 By December 2009 • Graduate Education Evaluation Guidebook • Launch of Guidebook at AAAS 2010 Annual Meeting In San Diego, Feb 18 – 22, 2010 By March 2010 • Info Briefs on 2008/09, including data and highlights of Top Producers for 2008/09

  3. Proposed Content for Guidebook -- Examining Progression to the STEM PhD and the Professorate: A Tool for Use in STEM Graduate Programs (Lessons Learned from AGEP) Conceptual Framework ***Collecting, using, and reporting disaggregated data ***Breaking psychological barriers to understanding and using program impact evaluation (fear of the pyramid) ***Retention as cross-cutting theme from pursuit of graduate school to completion of PhD to the Professoriate ***Short papers from graduate education researchers & AGEP leaders (10 pages or less with online link to supplementary materials)

  4. Section 1– General framework for Evaluating Graduate Education Programs***Evaluation Realities (With Jack; Not directly focused on AGEP but Graduate School Specific, Catherine Millett)***10 Easy Steps to Examining Progression to the STEM PhD (YSG and Pat) (Probably a Summary of the Entire Guidebook)***Conceptual Framework for Examining Progression to the STEM PhD (Already started by YSG and Pat & on AAAS AGEP web site)Charts***Suggested Questions for Evaluating STEM Graduate Programs at the University Level***Indicators for Evaluating STEM Graduate Programs at the University Level

  5. Section 2- Perspectives from Researchers in Graduate Education***Departmental Data Collection and Use, Chris Golde, Stanford***Case Study Research in Graduate Education and Cultural Relevance, Cynthia Winston and Kimberly Freeman***Wendy Stock (Matriculation Studies, Attrition, Time to Degree) ***Longitudinal Studies – From Leadership Alliance Summer Experience to Graduate School, Valerie Petit Wilson***IGERT, Jennifer Giancola Carney, ABT***CGS PhD Completion Project

  6. Section 3 --- Evaluation methods examples from the AGEP Alliances (Short Papers with emphasis on evaluation & supplementary material on line) ***Doctoral Completion & Attrition Methods, Angela James, UCLA ***Florida AGEP, Anne Donnelly & Team, Using comparison groups***Puerto Rico***Michigan***Colorado, Mark Hernandez & Team***Georgia Tech***UC (Collette Patt & Team)***Rice-Houston***Howard***Arizona***Utah***Others

  7. Section 4 – Tools for Graduate Education Program Evaluation***Developing a Cost Effective Graduate Student Data Collection Infrastructure (UCLA AGEP; U of Michigan AGEP, Georgia Tech)*** Using Electronic Graduate Student Databases (UCLA AGEP, MS AGEP, other AGEPs, Early Warning Systems)***Predictive models related to increasing campus production of URM PhDs ***Using National Databases for Comparisons at the University Level, Joan Burrelli, NSF & Lisa Frehill, CPST***Collecting and Displaying Data*** IRB, Human Subjects. Small Cell Size, Privacy and Confidentiality ***Council on Graduate Education PhD Completion Project

  8. Section 5 – Evaluation Methods for Examining Progression & Retention in the Professoriate***Evaluating the Postdoctoral Experience, Orlando Taylor & OthersLessons from NSF ADVANCE***Evaluation of Faculty Hiring and Practices and Processes to Broaden Participation, (Lesson from NSF ADVANCE)***Evaluation of Faculty Retention Practices and Processes to Broaden Participation Suzanne Brainard, UW; Sue Rosser; & Michigan

  9. Section 6 -- New Directions for Evaluation of Graduate Education Programs ***Evaluating the Cost Effectiveness of your Graduate Education Support Program ***Policy evaluations that highlight economic impact to state and nation

  10. Online Supplementary ResourcesBuilding Evaluation Capacityhttp://www.urban.org/publications/411651.htmlLinks to AAAS Data TemplatesLinks to CGS Data Templates

  11. http://nsfagep.org

  12. http://agep.us/

  13. Other Activities • Story on AAAS Home Page about 2007/08 AGEP PhD increases • Possible AAAS Congressional Briefing on URMs and Graduate Education • Proposed 2010 AAAS Annual Meeting Symposium or Workshop – San Diego, Feb 18 – 22, 2010 Other AAAS Event Mentioned Web site for Budget Analysis http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/

  14. http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/forum.htm

  15. AAAS/NSF HBCU-UP National Student Research Conference in DC, October 28 – 31, 2009 – 10th Anniversary

  16. Short Online Evaluation for this Meeting will be sent by next Friday, March 27, 2009Thanks for your participation!!!

More Related