1 / 10

Public Works

Public Works. FY 2013 Sources and Uses. Public Works. FY 2013 Sources and Uses. Public Works. Budget History By Division or Major Budget Area (in $ millions). Public Works. FY 2013 Key Issues and Strategies. Public Works

ciaran-adams
Download Presentation

Public Works

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Public Works FY 2013 Sources and Uses

  2. Public Works FY 2013 Sources and Uses

  3. Public Works Budget History By Division or Major Budget Area (in $ millions)

  4. Public Works FY 2013 Key Issues and Strategies Public Works • Key issue – Citywide cost allocation plan (CAP) implemented in FY 2013 with Public Works net impact of $482,964 General Fund • Key issue – General Fund budget (-15%) & staffing (-18%) reductions since 2009 • Strategy – analysis of each operation to identify efficiencies, service delivery improvements & cost savings • Strategy – administrative reorganization in SMIWM & PNR divisions to streamline functions & reduce costs

  5. Public Works FY 2013 Key Issues and Strategies • Refuse Fund • Key issue – fund operating at deficit & insufficient operating reserve • Strategy – operational efficiencies to improve service delivery & reduce costs • Detailed presentation to MSC May 22 • Maintenance • Route adjustments/ training • Operations & disposal • Public education campaign for variable rate program • Strategy – proposed refuse rate increase to Council for public hearing & consideration on June 4, 2012

  6. Public Works FY 2013 Key Issues and Strategies • Building Maintenance Fund • Key issue – funding operating at deficit • Strategy – FY 2013 is year 2 of 5 year recovery plan to operate in black by FY 2016 • Change funding allocation of FTEs to accurately reflect where labor is spent • Create & sustain revenue streams • Secure adequate funding to support maintenance, CIP & tenant improvement services provided • Maintain current level of structural maintenance on City facilities & buildings

  7. Public Works Significant Changes From FY 2012 Budget • Personnel • FY 2013 reflects net reduction of 2.0 FTE • Reductions • 1.0 vacant Security Ranger – BSFMD • 1.0 Management Analyst III – SMIWM • 1.0 vacant Management Analyst – Construction • Other • 1.0 Executive Secretary defunded – Admin. • 1.0 Street Light & Signal Tech added – SMIWM inadvertently removed in FY 2012

  8. Public Works Significant Changes From FY 2012 Budget • General Fund net decrease - $614,234 • Ongoing savings due to administrative reorganization – SMIWM & PNR • One-time savings due to 2.0 FTEs charging directly to energy efficient street lighting CIP project – SMIWM • One-time savings due to 1.0 Executive Secretary defunded – Admin. • 50% budgeted in General Fund • Ongoing savings due to 1.0 Management Analyst III eliminated – SMIWM • 50% budgeted in General Fund

  9. Public Works Significant Changes From FY 2012 Budget • Refuse Fund net decrease - $1,503,956 • One-time savings due to funding for equipment purchased in FY 2012 • Ongoing equipment maintenance savings due to vehicle replacement program & other efficiencies • Ongoing savings due to 1.0 Management Analyst III deleted – SMIWM • 50% budgeted in Refuse Fund • Ongoing increase due to CAP expense

  10. Public Works Significant Changes From FY 2012 Budget • Fleet Maintenance Fund net decrease - $1,400,425 • One-time savings due to funding for equipment purchased in FY 2012 • Ongoing savings due reduction for fleet sublet repair • Ongoing increase due to CAP expense

More Related