![]() |
||||
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only and may not be sold or licensed nor shared on other sites. SlideServe reserves the right to change this policy at anytime.
While downloading, If for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
1. Survival Analysis of Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation with Tracheostomy in New York State 1992-1996: Does Managed Care Influence Outcome for DRG 483? Diane M. Dewar, PhD
University at Albany, State University of New York
Jean-Paul Hafner, MD, MPH
Stratton VA Medical Center and
University at Albany, State University of New York
2. Critical Care Services’ Impact on Health Care Expenditures Critical care has a significant impact on health care expenditures in the United States
1-1.5% of gross domestic product
7-8% of total health care expenditures nationwide
20-34% of all hospital expenditures
50% of critical care expenditures are allocated to patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation
only 10% of critical care unit patients have prolonged mechanical ventilation
3. High Costs of Mechanical Ventilation Nationwide costs for mechanical ventilation in 1999 were in the range of $45 billion
Ventilator dependent patients have costs that are 8-9 times those of medical-surgical floor patients
Growth in utilization of mechanical ventilation is due to increased use among elderly with chronic conditions
leads to the question whether differential utilization of resources and outcomes are age-specific or due to delivery system changes
4. How does Delivery System Changes Affect Health Outcomes? Managed care delivery is associated with lower levels of critical care resource utilization than traditional delivery and financing
Results are mixed whether reduction is due to financial incentives of managed care organization or severity of illness
Which delivery system, managed care or traditional delivery and financing, is more efficient in utilizing these critical care resources?
5. Study Goals Study investigates the impact of managed care on hospital survival for critically ill patients requiring mechanically ventilation who are discharged under DRG 483 in New York State during 1992-1996.
Research Questions:
Are improved survival rates among managed care patients due to self-selection or the elimination of ineffective care in the inpatient setting?
Do delivery system changes or clinical characteristics have a greater influence over the health outcomes for this subpopulation?
6. Data Sources Hospital Characteristics from the Bureau of Health Economics, NYS Department of Health
Teaching status, number of beds, location
State-wide analysis uses New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data base for 1992-1996 under all-payer system
Demographic, clinical, discharge disposition and payor data collected for population of 1,456 patients managed care adults and 32,337 non-managed care adults aged 19-95 discharged under from hospitals under DRG 483, “tracheostomy except for mouth, larynx and pharynx disorder”
7. Sample Frame Exclusions Sample does not include patients:
With pre-existing tracheostomy
Who were over 95 years of age due to small numbers
With hospital stay over 90 days
Biologically implausible that events occurring at the time of tracheostomy would have longer-lasting effects
Discharged after 1996
No confounding from affects from competitive reimbursement regime under the NY Health Care Reform Act enacted in 1997.
8. Preliminary Statistical Analyses All conditions and procedures that were present in more than 3.5% of patients were examined with bivariate analysis (2 x 2 contingency tables) to test for an association with mortality
Where possible, similar diagnostic codes were grouped together for the final analysis
Comorbid conditions and procedures associated with a 1.5 times greater risk of mortality than the general subpopulation were obtained from ICD-9 codes (principal and secondary)
Preliminary inpatient survival assessments using Kaplan-Meier curves
Allowed for assessment of proportionality of hazards prior to entry in a multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Model (PH)
9. --------Preliminary Statistical Analyses :
age: linear, quadratic and cubic forms
demographics: dummy variables for race, gender, location
clinical risk factors: dummy variables for high frequency and high mortality diagnoses. Disorders of fluid, electrolyte, and acid-based balance, other bacterial pneumonia, pneumonia, organism unspecified, and pleurisy
admission type: dummy variable for emergency, urgent admission
payer classes: dummy variables for payment source (i.e., selfpay, various insurance combinations)
MCO: dummy variable for managed care participation, % MCO in hospital of discharge
HCRA: dummy variable competitive regime enactment
Length of stay
Teaching: teaching status of hospital of discharge
10. Profile of DRG 483 and DRG 475 Hospital Survivors in 1995-1999 in New York State DRG 483 survivors are more likely to be male, have more elective admissions, and have long hospital stays averaging 63 days.
DRG 475 survivors are more likely to be female, Hispanic, have more emergency admissions, and have moderate hospital stays of 17 days
No statistically significant differences between DRG 483 and DRG 475 survivors in managed care coverage and commercial/self-insurance class, upstate location, and most frequent age range of 36-50
12. Profile of Survivors in DRG 483 and DRG 475 Pre- and Post-NYS Health Care Reform Enactment of 1996 Pre-HCRA enactment
DRG 483 survivors are equally likely to be MCO and non-MCOs, with 30% of survivors discharged to SNFs
DRG 475 survivors are more likely to be in MCO, with 16% of survivors discharged to SNFs
Post-HCRA enactment
DRG 483 survivors are more likely to be in MCO, with 44% of survivors discharged to SNFs
The greatest proportion of survivors occurs in 1999
Regardless of MCO status, more survivors are seen post-HCRA
DRG 475 survivors are more likely to be in non-MCO, with 25% of survivors discharged to SNFs
The greatest proportion of survivors occurs in 1997-1999
15. Skilled Nursing Facility Discharge Rates for DRG 483 and DRG 475 by Year
16. Competitive Hospital Reimbursements and Payer Status are Major Determinants of Hospital Survival for DRG 483 Increased likelihood of survival seen for:
Competitive reimbursement regime
MCO discharges under HCRA
Decreased likelihood of survival seen for:
Medicare payment
Non-elective admissions
Statistically significant predictors but do not contribute to increased risk of survival:
MCO status
Hospital teaching status
Length of stay
17. Competitive Hospital Reimbursements and Payer Status are Major Determinants of Discharges to Skilled Nursing Facilities for DRG483 Results of two-stage probit model predicting likelihood of SNF discharges for survivors:
Significant increases in likelihood of SNF discharges for:
Competitive reimbursement regime
Medicaid payment
NYC location
Statistically significant predictors but do not contribute to increased risk of discharge location:
MCO status
Length of stay
Est. survival likelihood
18. Clinical Factors are Major Determinants of Hospital Survival for DRG 475 Increased likelihood of survival seen for:
Non-elective admissions
Chronic airway obstruction
Decreased likelihood of survival seen for:
Most other high-risk diagnose
Statistically significant predictors but do not contribute to increased risk of survival:
Competitive reimbursement regime
MCO status
Hospital teaching status
Length of stay
19. Competitive Hospital Regime and Payer Status are Major Determinants of Discharges to Skilled Nursing Facilities for DRG 475 Survivors Results of two-stage probit estimation predicting likelihood of SNF discharges for survivors:
Increases in SNF discharges seen for:
Competitive reimbursement regime
Medicaid payment
Hospital volume
Most high-risk diagnoses
Statistically significant predictors but do not contribute to increased risk of discharge location:
MCO status
Length of stay
Est. survival prob.
20. Discussion Models fit the data well and indicate that competitive hospital market leads to increased shifting to other venues of care for high-cost critical care patients
State-level administrative data can provide indication of impact of system changes on management of patients
Limitations include:
Lack of information concerning specific changes in reimbursement rates by payer under competition
Lack of information concerning intervention by case management and social work to facilitate discharge planning
Unclear what proportion of discharges to other venues are clinically appropriate or due to cost pressures
21. Clinical Excellence must be Combined with Cost Control Managed care does not uniquely impact the likelihood of survival nor skilled nursing facility discharges for survivors among DRG 483 and DRG 475 discharges
No unique evidence that managed care preferentially selects patients nor favorably manages discharges on the state-level
Competitive reimbursement regime under HCRA of 1996 indicates trends of increased hospital survival and increased cost-shifting to skilled nursing facilities for survivors among both DRGs
Differential reimbursements under Medicare for hospital and skilled nursing facilities may lead to increased discharges for LTC settings under competition
Critical care services delivered to older persons with chronic illness are facing greater scrutiny but clinical outcomes also need to be considered
more emphasis should be placed on multidisciplinary management teams