1 / 17

Implementing Tier Two in High Schools

Implementing Tier Two in High Schools. Ami Flammini , IL PBIS Network. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior. ~5% . SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT. ~15% . Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group

chiquita
Download Presentation

Implementing Tier Two in High Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementing Tier Two in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network

  2. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~5% SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~15% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students

  3. Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports:A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model Tier 1/Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems ODRs, Attendance, Tardies, Grades, DIBELS, etc. Tier 2/Secondary Tier 3/ Tertiary Check-in/ Check-out (CICO) Intervention Assessment Social/Academic Instructional Groups (SAIG) Daily Progress Report (DPR)(Behavior and Academic Goals) Group Intervention with Individualized Feature (e.g., Check and Connect -CnC and Mentoring) Competing Behavior Pathway, Functional Assessment Interview, Scatter Plots, etc. Brief Functional Behavior Assessment/ Behavior Intervention Planning (FBA/BIP) Complex or Multiple-domain FBA/BIP SIMEO Tools: HSC-T, RD-T, EI-T Wraparound Illinois PBIS Network, Revised October 2009 Adapted from T. Scott, 2004

  4. 3-Tiered System of Support Necessary Conversations (Teams) UniversalTeam Secondary Systems Team Problem Solving Team Tertiary Systems Team Uses Process data; determines overall intervention effectiveness Uses Process data; determines overall intervention effectiveness Plans SW & Class-wide supports Standing team; uses FBA/BIP process for one youth at a time CICO Universal Support Brief FBA/BIP SAIG Complex FBA/BIP WRAP Group w. individual feature Brief FBA/BIP Sept. 1, 2009

  5. 10 Critical Features for Tier 2 Interventions • Linked directly to school-wide expectations and/or academic goals • *Continuously available for student participation • *Implemented within 3 school days of determination that the student should receive the intervention • *Can be modified based on assessment and/or outcome data 5. Includes structured prompts for ‘what to do’ in relevant situations Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool version 2.0 Anderson, Lewis-Palmer, Todd, Horner, Sugai, & Sampson

  6. 10 Critical Features (Cont’d.) • Results in student receiving positive feedback from staff • Includes a school-home communication exchange system at least weekly • Orientation materials provide information for a student to get started on the intervention • *Orientation materials provide information for staff/ subs./ volunteers who have students using the intervention 10. Opportunities to practice new skills are provided daily Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool version 2.0 Anderson, Lewis-Palmer, Todd, Horner, Sugai, & Sampson

  7. 10 Critical Features: Considerations *Continuously available for student participation • Each student’s participation should be time-limited. Ex. After 6 weeks, either exit from intervention or progress to higher level intervention. *Implemented within 3 school days of determination that the student should receive the intervention • Youth can enter intervention at point of identification. No waiting for the ‘beginning’ of a group. Each session is a stand-alone behavioral lesson. *Can be modified based on assessment/outcome data • Limit modifying actual intervention for individual students unless youth is at ‘individualized’ level of support *All staff are informed of the details of the interventions

  8. Considerations • Universal is the first sign • The language of high schools • Culture of staff • Change the language around buy-in • Lines of communication • Define At-Risk • The moving roadblock • Ask more questions

  9. Universal How do you know you are having the right conversation around tier 2 implementation?

  10. The Language of High Schools U-tube video clip re: language

  11. Staff Culture • The role it plays in Tier 2 implementation • How will you know if staff culture is impacting implementation? • What questions will you ask?

  12. Change the language around Staff Buy-In

  13. Lines of communication • How do we communicate a plan? • Are we telling or are we teaching? • How is our team functioning? • Administration

  14. At-Risk • Determine what at-risk means in your building • Who is the intervention designed to help? • Do we have the “right” students?

  15. The moving road-block • What to consider when the roadblock keeps moving. • What to do to help remove it.

  16. Ask more questions • Ask more questions before problem solving • Get specific • Take breaks • Stay at the table

  17. Questions Ami.flammini@pbisillinois.org

More Related