1 / 27

Supplementary Education Funding

Supplementary Education Funding. Joint Working Group Report Highlights May 2006. Background. Long-standing tradition of Supplementary Education Funding (SEF) within HRM Students benefit significantly from SEF Annual SEF budget/approval process leads to unnecessary tensions. Background.

chip
Download Presentation

Supplementary Education Funding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Supplementary Education Funding Joint Working Group Report Highlights May 2006

  2. Background • Long-standing tradition of Supplementary Education Funding (SEF) within HRM • Students benefit significantly from SEF • Annual SEF budget/approval process leads to unnecessary tensions

  3. Background • Joint Working Group formed to recommend a long-term strategy for SEF • Members from Council, School Board and education critics for provincial Liberal and NDP parties • 13 meetings over the past 12 months

  4. Mandate • Research and agree on relevant facts/history • Investigate all options for SEF • Joint recommendations to Council, School Board and DOE • Open and maintain respectful dialogue

  5. Process • Facilitated by neutral facilitator • Supported by “expert” staff resources • Created environment for open and respectful discussion • Defined shared principles and characteristics of “win-win” solution(s)

  6. Shared Principles • Education: • Is important for the advancement of our region • Is a shared responsibility • Involves life-long learning

  7. Shared Principles • Supporting education strengthens the success of schools, neighbourhoods and communities • Resources should be shared across the school system according to need

  8. A Win-Win Solution • Increased student access to programs and services leading to measurable student improvement • No loss of funds for schools or students • Fewer demands on HRM Councilors to explain/defend educational funding

  9. A Win-Win Solution • Reasonable overall tax burden for HRM residents with equitable allocation of SEF rate • No loss of programs in traditional areas • Elimination to former city/county boundaries in taxation discussions/debates

  10. A Win-Win Solution • Increased clarity among stakeholders re educational goals and funding • Simplified budgeting, accounting and reporting for HRSB • Increased collaboration between HRSB and HRM

  11. A Win-Win Solution • Scaleable solution – could be used in other parts of the province • Long-term sustainability • Public feedback that supports fairness to taxpayers and equity to students

  12. Educational Funding • Two primary sources for all school boards: • Province of Nova Scotia through provincial budget allocation • Municipal units through a minimum municipal contribution

  13. Educational Funding • HRSB – Supplementary Education Funding • S. 530 – Municipal Government Act • “Additional funding” mandated in former Halifax and Dartmouth • Must be spent in area where $ raised

  14. Educational Funding • HRSB – Supplementary Education Funding • Area rate levied on assessed value of residential property and business occupancy • Can be decreased 10% per annum • In Bedford/County, by practice (vs. legislated obligation)

  15. Business Planning Challenges • Three budgets – Halifax, Dartmouth and Bedford/County • Inequity of programs/services across school system

  16. Business Planning Challenges • School Board does not control the SEF budget – makes long-term planning difficult • “Area” segmentation prevents achievement of efficiencies

  17. What Does SEF cover? • Provincial and mandatory funding covers: • General operations and targeted programs • 83% of general funding is for staff salaries and benefits • General funding is allocated within SB based on staffing formula developed over the years

  18. What Does SEF cover? • SEF enhances opportunities for students through: • Additional staffing for existing programs/services • Enrichment of PSP and special programs • Additional school instructional supplies

  19. Solutions – Themes Explored • Province should bear the full cost • Decision-making and accountability for SEF with the School Board • Current system with increased use of commercial tax base for SEF

  20. Solutions – Themes Explored • Harmonize SEF rate across HRM and allow funds to be used across the system • Miscellaneous: • Deed transfer tax • Dwelling tax • Per student rate • Etc.

  21. Solutions – Consensus • Blend of several themes • Closer link to provincial responsibility • School board with decision-making and accountability • Overall tax burden must be reasonable – need for a cap on SEF

  22. Recommendations • Amend legislation • Enable school boards to levy SEF (to a max. of 10% of previous year’s global budget) • SEF business case approved by DOE • Amount collected and remitted by municipal units • Annual report by school boards on usage of SEF

  23. Win-Win? YES. • SB can plan for and implement increased access to programs/services • No loss of funds to schools or students • Fewer demands on HRM councilors to explain/justify educational funding • Cap should ensure reasonable overall tax burden

  24. Win-Win? YES. • Locations may change but no loss of access to programs for traditional areas • Single system-wide budgeting, accounting and reporting for SB • Eliminate annual “bun fight” between HRM and HRSB

  25. Win-Win? YES. • Could be extended to all school boards • “Approvable” by all parties • Fair to taxpayers and equitable to students within HRM

  26. Next Steps • Future date for discussion/debate • Approval by Council and School Board • Joint submission to Minister of Education

  27. Thank You • Questions for clarification

More Related