1 / 14

GLAST Large Area Telescope

Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope. GLAST Large Area Telescope. Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical (EEE) Parts Nick Virmani Naval Research Lab, Washington DC nvirmani@swales.com 202-767-3455. EEE Parts Selection Criteria.

chip
Download Presentation

GLAST Large Area Telescope

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large Area Telescope Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical (EEE) Parts Nick Virmani Naval Research Lab, Washington DC nvirmani@swales.com 202-767-3455

  2. EEE Parts Selection Criteria • Parts screening and qualification per GSFC-311-INST-001 level 2, superceded by EEE-INST-002, and LAT EEE Parts Program Control Plan LAT-MD-00099-1. • Manufacturer’s process control and construction, policies on qualification, reliability process monitor, requalification, screening. • Certification of manufacturing and assembly (Surface Mount and MCM Assembly) processes to be compatible with parts. • Thermal profile of reflow equipment and process control. • Parts Control Board (PCB) approval of all parts, procedures, specifications along with procurement controls and documentation • Electrical testing of parts and board assemblies for extended temperature range. • Derating of all parts as per PPL-21. • Parts stress analysis for each board assembly prior to flight assembly. • GIDEP search and review of parts from selection until launch.

  3. EEE Parts Challenges • New technology parts never used in space application such as the 3.3 volt ADC, DAC, Polyswitch Fuses, ASICs, MCMs Nanoconnectors, etc. • ASICs (system on chip) with million channels. • Plastic Encapsulated Microcircuits (PEMs) • Wide range of parts. • The risk is a key issue in the decision making process. • All subsystem managers, engineers, GSFC, and parts control board (PCB) have to agree for radiation, testing, screening, and qualification issues. • Tight budget.

  4. ACD Front End Electronics Board – all parts approved except ASICs and MAX494 OpAmps ASICs testing procedure and plan to be prepared and to be approved by PCB. High Voltage Bias Supply (HVBS) Board – all parts approved except high voltage capacitor, inductors, etc. Plans are in process for approval of all parts. Resistor Tap Network Board – no issues CAL Front End Electronics Board – all parts approved except MAX145 & MAX5121. Test flows approved by GSFC PCB, LAT-SS-01878. Test set-up is in process to be reviewed and approved by PCB. ASICs – Flight design to be finalized. Test flows, LAT-SS-01879 approved by GSFC. Other specifications and procedures are in process. Photodiode Assembly – All parts approved. Qualification will start by the first week of June 2003. EEE Parts Status

  5. DAQ General part list for the selection of parts submitted. 90% of the parts have been approved. Allocation of the parts to each board design (PDU, SIU, AEM, GASU, EPU) is in process and to be reviewed by PCB. ASICs – flight design to be finalized. Test flows LAT-SS-01879 approved by GSFC PCB. Other specifications and procedures are in process are to be reviewed and approved by PCB. RAD750 – part list approval based on other GSFC program. TKR MCM - ASIC wafer testing in process. Procedure for MCM chip-on-board assembly, testing, wire bonding, MCM mounting, integration and in-process controls to be submitted to PCB for approval. Polyfuse – GSFC approved screening & qualification specification and preliminary testing results show no concern. Waiting for flight material. Flex Cable – flex cable design under revision. Specification will be revised. No manufacturing and qualification issues. Cristek connector qualification report being requested from Vendor. EEE Parts Status

  6. ACD – MAX494 under testing at GSFC. ASICs will be tested when parts available no other issues. CAL – Voltage reference, MAX145, and MAX5121 will be tested at Brookhaven Lab in June 2003. Tests coordinated with GSFC Radiation Branch Code 561. ASICs will be tested when parts available. DAQ – General parts lists are under review by GSFC radiation branch code 561. ASIC radiation test plan under review by GSFC. ASICs will be tested when available. TKR – SEE testing of ASICs will be done at Legnaro (IT). In addition, two Tracker ASIC MCMs will be SEE tested at TAMU for comparison of data. All LAT ASIC designs have a common gate library and architecture. If the results at TAMU and Legnaro are comparable, the remaining ASIC type will not be tested at TAMU. CAL – Photodiode testing and crystal testing is in process. Radiation Testing Status

  7. ACD Derating and part stress analysis is in process CAL Derating and part stress analysis is complete TKR Derating and part stress analysis is complete DAQ Derating and part stress analysis will be performed after selection of parts for SIU, PDU, GASU, EPU, RAD750 and power supply. Our goal is to complete derating and part stress analysis prior to flight board fabrication EEE Part Derating and Part Stress Analysis Status

  8. Process Flow Chart for ASICs Wafer/Die Packaging WAFERS RECEIVE FROM MOSIS USING AGILENT PROCESS INSPECTION WAFER MOUNT PROCEDURE WAFER SAW PROCEDURE WAFFLE PACK DIES AND SHIP TO ASAT DIE ATTACH ADHESION LAT Released Procurement Document LAT Released Procurement Document LAT Released Procurement Document LAT Released Procurement Document Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Inspection per MIL-STD-883 RECEIVING INSPECTION AT ASAT To be performed at GSFC LEAD FRAME SELECTION CONTROL MONITORS DIE ATTACH CURE WIREBOND WIREBOND MONITOR OPTICAL INSPECTION MOLDING DIE ATTACH MONITOR

  9. Process Flow Chart for Packaging of ASICs Molding Compound Selection Molding Post Mold Cure Trim Mark Mark Cure Plating Strip Visual Molding Monitor Trim Monitor Mark Monitor Plating Monitor Trays / Tubes CSAM 20 pcs. from lot Form Final Inspection QA Buy-off Dry Bake Inspection Pack Ship to testing facility for testing Form Monitor Lead Scan Packing Material Decision for acceptance Final Visual Examination

  10. ASICs Screening Flow in Parallel to PreQual/Qual and Radiation Testing 4A 4 2 3 1 Packaged ASIC parts Select 10% minimum or 200 pieces, whichever is greater, from the total lot for screening and qualification. DPA 5 samples of each type. The balance qty of ASIC parts are to be stored in N2 purged bags and containers. External Visual Inspection as per MIL-STD-883, 100% 100% electrical, functional, and parametric measurements at room temp. +25C Receiving Inspection for ID and damage 4B 4D 4C CSAM decision to be made after review of Qual data from page 8 Serialization 10% parts or min. 200 pcs. whichever is greater 6A 6C Decision by PCB, if electrical tests to be performed on balance quantity. 5 6 10 pcs. of each type for SEE RAD Testing 100% Thermal cycle -40C to 125C (20 cycles) unpowered Perform electrical testing at room temp. on 10% of parts or 200 pcs. minimum, whichever is greater. 6D 6B Balance quantity to be used for screening 85 parts if more than 500 total, 52 parts if less than 500 for Pre-Qualification/Qualification 7 8 9 Prepare test fixtures for dynamic burn-in, prepare test programs and verify the functionality of burn-in boards for screening of parts and submit burn-in diagram for approval to PCB Dynamic Burn-in for 168 hours at 85C but do not exceed junction temp of 125C. Burn-in procedures to be approved by the PCB Perform 100% electrical, functional, and parametric measurement at three temperatures i.e., room temp. +25C, high +85C, and low temp. -30C.

  11. ASICs Screening Flow in Parallel to PreQual/Qual and Radiation Testing 12 11 10 11A Review TID results and if parts are acceptable, bake parts from block 9 and ship the screened parts to ACD and DAQ and store balance quantity in nitrogen purge bags to be used for rework, see block 22. CSAM (optional) Decision will be made after review of Pre-Qual/Qual Data. See block 4A and 4C for quantity. Parts Control Board (PCB) to make decision to use the balance parts (block 4A & 4B) after reviewing test data. Select 10 samples of each type for total dose testing under bias. 13 Verify integrity of bare PWB as per GSFC S-312-P-003, prepare reflow profile, run test boards after assembly as per NASA-STD-8739.2, prepare detailed procedures, certify selected vendor, verify functionality of sample assembled board, submit all procedures to PCB for approval, and conduct flight mount review. Software and procedure to be configuration controlled and all anomalies as recorded 14 Bake parts from block 4A only if any of the bags have been opened 15 17 16 Assemble flight boards using proven, approved, and configuration controlled documents as defined in block 13. Mandatory inspection points during assembly to be defined by PCB 100% electrical verification of flight board at room temp. using configuration controlled and approved test program as per procedure approved by PCB 100% Visual Inspection of assembled boards as per NASA-STD-8739.2 for surface mount assemblies

  12. ASICs Screening Flow in Parallel to PreQual/Qual and Radiation Testing 18 19 20 21 100% Dynamic burn-in (flight assembled boards) at 85C for 168 hours with continuous monitoring using configuration controlled test program. Procedures to be approved by PCB 100% Electrical test at -30C with continuous monitoring using configuration control test program Review results, calculate deviations in the electrical parameters from the previous tests 100% Visual Inspection as per NASA-STD-8739.2 24 22 (Rework If Required) 23 – Reworked and Spare Boards 25 Present all data to Parts Control Board (PCB) Rework and replace boards, if any, using the screened parts from block 12. All rework and replacement of parts to be recorded. Number of rework and replacement parts to be decided by PCB. Perform 100% electrical testing using configuration controlled test program after rework at room temperature 25C, high temp.+85C and low temp. -30C Obtain approval of PCB 26 27 28 29 Conformal coat assembled and tested boards Perform 100% electrical testing using the configuration controlled test program Store flight boards in nitrogen purge storage Flight boards ready for integration

  13. ASIC Pre-Qual/Qual Flow Q6 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 100% Electrical Testing at room temp. 25C, high +85C, & low -30C 85 parts if lot is more than 500 pcs. or 52 parts if less than 500. Block 6B after electrical test. CSAM 100% Radiography 100% SMT Simulation 100% CSAM 100% Q7 Divide into 3 sub-lots Q8 Q13 Q18 HAST 100 hours at 130C 20 pcs. from lot of 85 or 15 pcs. from lot of 52 Unpowered Temperature Cycling 200 cycles (-55C to 125C), 1 cycle / hour, 20 pcs. from lot of 85 or 15 pcs. from lot of 52 Life test at 125C 45 pcs. from lot of 85 or 22 pcs. from lot of 52 Q19 Q9 CSAM 100% Interim Electrical Measurement after 160 hrs at room temp. 25C. Q14 CSAM 100% Q10 Q15 Q20 100% Electrical functional and parametric measurement at room temp 25C, high +85C & low -30C 100% Electrical functional and parametric measurement at room temp 25C, high +85C & low -30C 100% Electrical functional and parametric measurement at room temp 25C, high +85C & low -30C Q11 Examination of Data Q16 Q21 Examination of Data Examination of Data Q22 Q12 Q17 Report Report Report Q23 PCB Review

  14. Summary & Risk Mitigation • LAT engineers team involvement on PCB with GSFC parts and radiation branch personnel. • Manage risk by adding process controls, manufacturing assurance, screening, and qualification. • Select standard pre-qualified parts where possible. • Store, handle, and assemble parts using well qualified procedures. • Check board assembly manufacturing process for all parts for compatibility. • Use previous mission lessons learned database • Use of well qualified personnel • All above plans are in process and risks are being managed continuously. • Parts plan is in good shape.

More Related