1 / 35

Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Project

Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Project. Monitoring and Laboratory Division June 28, 1999. California Environmental Protection Agency. Air Resources Board. Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Workshop. Changes in the Proposed Regulations

chinojosa
Download Presentation

Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Project Monitoring and Laboratory Division June 28, 1999 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board

  2. Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Workshop • Changes in the Proposed Regulations • Proposed Test Methods for Spill-Proof Systems • Draft Refueling Spillage Test Data • Permeation and Barrier Feasibility Test Data • Estimated Effectiveness of Spill-Proof Systems • Population/Activity/Emissions Inventory • Estimated Price Increases for Spill-Proof Systems • Regulatory Process • More Information

  3. Proposed Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Regulations • Proposed Regulations apply to both portable fuel containers and spouts • Section 2472. Performance Standards for Spill-Proof Systems and Spill-Proof Spouts • Section 2472 (a)&(b). Three flow rate standards based on container size (e.g., 1/2 gallon/minute for containers 1.25 gallons) • Section 2472. Permeation Standard of 0.4 grams/gallon/day

  4. Proposed Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Regulations (continued) • Section 2473. Exemptions, rapid refueling devices for off-road motorcycle competitions & portable fuel tanks for outboards • Section 2475. Flow rate labeling requirement • Section 2477. Test Methods for determining compliance with Performance Standards

  5. Section 2477. Test Methods • Test Method 510 - Automatic Shut-Off Test Procedure • Test Method 511 - Automatic Closure Test Procedure • Test Method 512 - Flow Rate Test Procedure • Test Method 513 - Permeation Test Procedure

  6. Test Method 510 - Automatic Shut-Off • Fill container with water and invert for 5 minutes to check for leaks • Dispense contents into a 1/2 gallon test fixture • Fill test fixture to at least 1 inch from the top of the opening (± 1/8”) without overflowing • Repeat the process 3 times

  7. Test Method 511 - Automatic Closure • Apply Test Method 510 protocol except fill the test fixture to approximately 50% of capacity • Hold the inverted container over the test fixture for 30 seconds to check for leaks and proper function of automatic closure • Pressurize container to 10 psig with the spout installed, leave undisturbed for 24-hours and record any pressure loss • Maximum allowable 24-hour pressure loss is 1 psig

  8. Test Method 512 - Flow Rate Test Procedure • Fill container to its nominal capacity with water and invert for 5 minutes to check for leaks • Determine the amount of time to dispense all but approximately 1 pint of the liquid • Determine the mass of liquid dispensed by pre and post weighing the container • Calculate a flow rate in gallons/minute using the density of water at 25°C • Test each container 3 times to determine the average flow rate

  9. Test Method 513 - Determination of Permeation Rates • Precondition containers with gasoline for a minimum of 4 weeks • Empty and re-fill containers with CERT fuel, seal, leak test, then expose to a 24-hour variable temperature profile • Weigh containers every 24-hours to determine the permeation rate gravimetrically • Must verify weight loss is linear (steady state) • Average of 5 consecutive 24-hour diurnal cycles used to determine the final rate

  10. Refueling Spillage Test Procedure • Randomly selected ARB employees using conventional containers and spouts fill a 2400 ml fuel tank • Each participant performs several trials with randomly selected containers • Mass of the fuel dispensed is determined by pre and post weighing the containers

  11. Refueling Emissions Test Bench

  12. Refueling Emissions Test Bench

  13. Draft Refueling Spillage Test Data • Out of 56 events, 25 included refueling spillage (45%) • Average per spillage event (less displaced vapor) =16.4 grams • Total fuel dispensed - 51.1 gallons • Testing will continue through July 2nd, final results will be posted on our web site

  14. Permeation and Barrier Feasibility Tests • Average permeation rates determined from testing untreated HDPE containers • Treated containers also tested to determine the effectiveness of barrier surface treatments • Containers ranged in size from 1.25 gallons to 6.6 gallons and included products from 5 different manufacturers • Containers were tested with Phase II California Reformulated Certification (CERT) fuel • Select containers were also tested with a blend of Carbob and fuel grade ethanol (5.7% mass) • Barrier surface treatments included Sulfonation & 2 levels of Fluorination (levels 3 & 5)

  15. Permeation and Barrier Feasibility Tests

  16. Permeation and Barrier Surface Treatment Feasibility Test Data

  17. Average Permeation Rates for Untreated Containers • 1.25 gallons - 1.52 g/gal/day • 2.06 gallons - 1.88 g/gal/day • 2.5 gallons - 1.46 g/gal/day • 5 gallons - 1.43 g/gal/day • 6.6* gallons - 1.09 g/gal/day • Average Permeation Rate - 1.57 grams/gallon/day

  18. Average Permeation Rates for Treated Containers

  19. Average Permeation Rates Proposed Standard

  20. Estimated Effectiveness of Spill-Proof Systems • Reduce diurnal emissions by 75% • Eliminate refueling spillage - 100% • Eliminate transport and storage losses - 100% • Reduce average permeation rates by 75% • Collects 45% of displaced vapors

  21. Portable Fuel Container (Gas Cans) Population/Activity/Emissions Inventory Mobile Source Control Division June 28, 1999 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board

  22. Statewide Population and Activity of Gas Cans • Determined through surveys • Residential Survey • Commercial Survey

  23. Residential Population/Activity Parameters • % of households with gas cans - 46% • # of gas cans per household - 0.8 • % of gas cans stored empty - 30% • Average gas can capacity - 3.0 gallons • Average age of gas can - 5.5 years • Plastic and metal gas cans ratio - 76:24

  24. Residential Population/Activity Parameters (Continued) • % Plastic cans with closed system - 53% • % Plastic cans with open system - 23% • % Metal cans with closed system - 13% • % Metal cans with open system - 11%

  25. Commercial Population/Activity Parameters • # of gas cans per business - 6.9 • Average gas can capacity - 3.4 gallons • Average age of gas cans - 1.34 years • Plastic and metal gas cans ratio - 72:28

  26. Commercial Population/Activity Parameters (Continued) • % Plastic cans with closed system - 33% • % Plastic cans with open system - 39% • % Metal cans with closed system - 18% • % Metal cans with open system - 10%

  27. Gas Can Population Estimates • Residential gas can population - 9 million • Expansion Factor - # of housing units by county obtained from California State Department of Finance • Commercial gas can population - 400,000 • Expansion Factor - # of businesses which may have gas cans from InfoUSA database

  28. Various Emissions Related Processes Associated with Gas Cans • Diurnal Loss - Ambient Temperature • Permeation Loss - Pressure and gas can material • Spillage - During refueling of equipment • Vapor Displacement - During refueling of equipment

  29. Permeation Emission Rates • 1.57 grams per gallon per day • Obtained through gravimetric testing of several gas cans

  30. Diurnal Emission Rates (Draft) • Several cans under different conditions were tested using Sealed Housing Evaporative Determination method. • Plastic/closed system - 2.15 g/gal/day • Plastic/open system - 21.76 g/day • Metal/closed system - 2.15 g/gal/day • Metal/open system - 21.76 g/gal/day

  31. Spillage and Vapor Displacement Emission Rate • 17.3 g/refueling - obtained from USEPA’s NEVES report • Vapor displacement - 4.52 g/gal • Waiting for Data

  32. Estimated Prices of Spill-Proof Systems • Average price increase per Spill-Proof System estimated between $5.50 - $8.00 per container • Estimate compares retail prices of similarly constructed containers • Breaks containers into 3 size categories, 1-1.5 , 2-2.5, 5-6 gallons • Pre-Regulation retail estimates of fuel containers are: • 1-1.5 gallon - $3.24 • 2-2.5 gallon - $4.69 • 5-6 gallon - $9.99

  33. Regulatory Process • Workshop June 28, 1999 • Consider all comments received by July 9, 1999 • Staff Report - August 6, 1999 • Start of 45 day public comment period • Board Hearing - September 23, 1999

  34. More Information On The Emissions Inventory • www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/spillcon/inventor.htm • Archana Agrawal, Manager, Inventory Assessments Section (626) 450-6136 • aagrawal@arb.ca.gov

  35. More Information On The Regulation • www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/spillcon/spillcon.htm • Workshop presentation will be posted on the web site • Dean Bloudoff (916) 263-2070 • dbloudof@arb.ca.gov

More Related