THEMIS
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 23

THEMIS MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW VIBRATION & ACOUSTICS David Pankow PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 98 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

THEMIS MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW VIBRATION & ACOUSTICS David Pankow University of California – Berkeley …with help from: Terry Scharton (NC State) & Mike Sholl (UCB). Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics. AGENDA TOPICS Probe 2 Test Results

Download Presentation

THEMIS MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW VIBRATION & ACOUSTICS David Pankow

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

THEMIS

MISSION PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

VIBRATION & ACOUSTICS

David Pankow

University of California – Berkeley

…with help from: Terry Scharton (NC State) & Mike Sholl (UCB)


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

  • AGENDA TOPICS

  • Probe 2 Test Results

    • P-2 Test “look back”: The ~ 5 sigma extreme peaks

  • JPL-2 Test Requirements

    • PC + Mass Dummies + QM PSS → Separation (a pre-test)

    • PCA Vibration Testing

    • PCA Acoustics Test


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

  • BACKGROUND Information

  • Vibration tests have been performed on all boxes by UCB & Swales (various)

  • Sine Burst - Strength Qualification of ALL Probes performed by Swales. (SAI-RPT-0627 rev.C)

  • Sine Burst & Qualification of PSS (probe sep. system) by Swales. (SAI-RPT-0643, SAI-RPT-0720)

  • Modes, Burst, & Acoustic Test of PC with mass simulators by Swales(SAI-RPT-0705)

  • Probe 2 “Pathfinder” Vibration Test at JPL(SAI-TM-3025)


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

  • “PATHFINDER” PROBE 2 TESTS @ JPL, 27-31 MARCH

  • 3 Axis - 5-50 Hz Sine Sweep

    • Rigid Body Motion – 1st Z mode was  100 Hz, Lateral was  60 Hz

  • 3 Axis - 20-2000 Hz Random(tests were at -3 dB to avoid the ~5s overloads)

    • Z Axis behaved like a “Brick”, all Q’s were less than 10

    • X & Y Axes were a more Interesting !

  • Pre- / Post sine signatures identified no significant changes

  • Vibration data has now been thoroughly reviewed by Berkeley & Swales

    • CLA-2 validation by Swales has been provided to code 542

  • PAF Shock Test was Performed after Vibration – very benign !

  • Post-Test Probe CPT was OK


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

PYRO SHOCK Test Data from Probe 2 Test at JPL


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

PSD’s of the Control Accelerometers and Base Force (-3 dB test)Force Limiting “C” was REDUCED from 2.0 to 1.4 (-6dB test) to stay within Test Limit Loads- in traditional log-log plot format→

“GI-GO”

“REAL”

“GI-GO”

This Linear Scale plot reflects the“true ∫areanature” of stated Grms values“GI-GO” = garbage in → garbage out


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: vibro-acoustics – 5s peaks

BaseForce Time History for the X Axis -3 dB Random Vibration Test

1069/213 = 5 s


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Cross-Correlation of Base Force and Control Accelerometers

X axis random vibration – single largest FORCE peak in this test

CC [Xi Yi ] = Sj Xj* Yi+j … or ∫sX*(t) Y( t+s) dt …where X* is the complex conjugate

  • 0.002 sec

    ( as ½ sine → 250 Hz)

  • 0.0007 sec

    ( as ½ sine →700 Hz)

Force ‘Time Lag’

 0.0004 sec.

( ~36 phase @ 250 Hz)


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: vibro-acoustics – 5s peaks

Summary of the Themis Probe Test Extreme Peaks

  • DATA BASED OBSERVATIONS

  • The largest Force and input Acceleration peaks were NOT concurrent

  • The active Mass (above) is NOT be confused with Modal Mass in FEM results

    • The Modal Mass (sine) does not compare well with this Active Mass (random)

  • Force peaks, as compared to acceleration, seem to load a larger fraction of the mass

  • Corresponding force and acceleration “local peak frequencies” estimates differ


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: vibro-acoustics – 5s peaks


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: vibro-acoustics – 5s peaks

  • Wide-band Input or Response

  • Distribution of Peaks tends toward Gaussian.

  • As the bandwidth of a Gaussian process increases, tending toward white noise, the distribution of peaks moves from Rayleigh to Gaussian (See for example: Lutes and Sarkani, Random Vibration, Elsevier Press, NY, NY, p. 493)

  • For a Gaussian probability distribution, the probability of |x| > 5s is 6E-7. If one has 60 seconds of white noise digitized at 20,000 points per sec. The probability of a point exceeding 5sis 60 * 20,000*6 E-7 = 73% This may explain why one sees more extreme peaks than predicted by a Rayleigh distribution.


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: vibro-acoustics – 5s peaks

  • 5s Extreme Peaks Conclusions

  • Extreme peaks in the base force & acceleration responses are a very real threat

  • Extreme single peaks in the input acceleration are less of a concern because they do not appear to produce near-resonant amplification of the response

  • The curve fit (slide 9) of the ‘Top 100’ base force and control accelerometer peaks indicate that both distributions were Gaussian in our Themis testing

  • Given the frequent observance of five sigma test peaks in time histories of responses in random vibration tests, three sigma design strength requirements, such as those in NASA-STD-5002, appear inconsistent.

    • The options are to increase mission limit loads, or to decrease test margins


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

TEST REQUIREMENTS

Environmental Test Matrix( SAI-SPEC-1164, Rev. A)

  

X

JPL-2

  

JPL-2

X

JPL-2

 

  

X

JPL-2

JPL-2

X -“Random Vibration is a POOR Substitute for Acoustics”Scott Gordon, code 542

}

JPL-2


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

  • PRE-TEST of PC (fm) + QM PSS + Mass Dummies → Separation

  • Based on a standing AETD concern

    • PSS Qualification used rigid interfaces

    • There is a concern for PCA petal flexing

    • Missing fuel mass may not adequately load the petals & PSS

    • This may cause “unknown-unknowns” in the Probe Sep. System

  • Worst Axis, or both Lateral Axes (if analyses are not conclusive)

    • Restrained PSS release with Probe Dummy on PC


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

PCA MODAL MASS vs. FREQUENCY

NON- FUELED PROBES

OUR TEST CONFIGURATION

FUELED PROBES

FOR REFERENCE ONLY !!


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

  • PCA (with 5 flight probes) Vibration Testing

  • TEST PLANS

    • Thm-mint-proc-060 vibration tests

    • Thm-mint-proc-045 launch electrical configuration

    • SAI-spec-1164, Rev A

      • CLA-2 Sine update in SAI-TM-3005

    • JPL: 144-D-V-100261

  • TEST SEQUENCE

  • Pre- / Post- Sine Signatures

  • 3 Axis 5-50 Hz (CLA-2) Sine Sweep (¼, ½, full)

  • Z Axis 20-500 Hz Random at Probe Levels ← a placeholder

    • Scott Gordon (542) & Alan Posey (543) recommend dropping this test !

      • PCA acoustics is an accepted “workmanship” substitute


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

5-50 Hz PCA Sine Sweep

(CLA-2 Predicts by SAI)

NOTCH if needed for Limit Loads

Lateral Axes(T.L.L. = 4.31 G’s)

Thrust Axis(T.L.L = 5.81G’s)


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

  • PCA Acoustics Test

  • TEST PLANS

  • Thm-mint-proc-061

    • Same Accel. List used in Vibration

      • PSS brackets will be included

  • SAI-plan-0740

  • JPL: 144-D-A-100000, Rev. E

  • Same setup as GSFC - PC Test

  • (7/14/05)


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

PCA Acoustics Test Levels


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

BACKUP SLIDES


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics

  • PCA (with 5 flight probes) Vibration Testing

  • BRIEF TEST PLAN HISTORY

    • PLAN 1 contained first probe random, then 2 x 2 (as delivered) probe random

    • The 2 x 2 random was viewed as “risk mitigation” for the later PCA acoustics

    • Our plans have evolved to 1 x 4 testing as delivery dates changed

    • Scott Gordon noted there wasn’t much risk if acoustics follows probe random

      • 2nd- 5th Probe random tests were deleted

    • Hallway “kibitzing” at JPL lead to “PCA random” as a surrogate ‘workmanship test’

      • Scott Gordon observed that acoustics is a recognized workmanship test


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics


Themis mission pre environmental review vibration acoustics david pankow

Themis PER: Vibration & Acoustics


  • Login