1 / 28

Oceanographic experiments using a light aircraft as a source of sound

Oceanographic experiments using a light aircraft as a source of sound. Fernando Simonet SIO 204B 03/04/04. Overview. Motivation for measurements of acoustic properties of sediments Experimental setup Introduction of the aircraft as a low-frequency sound source Experiments off La Jolla, CA

chico
Download Presentation

Oceanographic experiments using a light aircraft as a source of sound

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Oceanographic experiments using a light aircraft as a source of sound Fernando Simonet SIO 204B 03/04/04

  2. Overview • Motivation for measurements of acoustic properties of sediments • Experimental setup • Introduction of the aircraft as a low-frequency sound source • Experiments off La Jolla, CA • Beamforming results • Conclusions

  3. Experimental setup • 11-element VLA • Sediment phones • Compressional • Shear • 16 channel portable DAQ • R/V Diamond Star • R/V MPL Boston Whaler

  4. 11-element VLA • Quadrupled nested with 5 elements per nesting • 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz • ITC hydrophones • Sea state zero with -157 dB re 1v/uPa • 30 to 75000 Hz Omnidirectional response • Built-in low noise 20 dB pre-amps • Built-in compass and tilt sensor • Hand deployable

  5. VLA Nestings

  6. VLA Beam forming

  7. Sediment phones • Reson hydrophones • Compressional wave • Buried ~1m deep • Sea state zero with -186 dB re 1v/uPa sensitivity • 15 Hz to 480 kHz Omnidirectional response • Built-in 26 dB low noise pre-amp • NRL Shear sensor (bender) • Shear wave • Buried ~1m deep • -160 dB re 1uPa/V • 20 to 20000 Hz flat response • Built-in low noise pre-amps

  8. DAQ System • Compact form factor PC (PXI) • Runs Win2K and LabVIEW • 12 VDC Battery powered • 16 simultaneously sampled channels • Max sample rate of 102400 Hz • Very high dynamic range (24 bit) • On board LPF

  9. 4 seater, single engine, light aircraft Lycomming 180 hp engine 8 m long and 12 m wing span 217 km/h (120 kts) cruise speed 3 blade wooden propeller 1100 km range 5.46 m/s (1070 ft/min) rate of climb 105 dollars/hour R/V Diamond Star

  10. R/V MPL Boston Whaler • 2 seater, single engine, light motor vessel • Mercury 75 hp engine • 5 m long and 2 m beam • 45 km/h (25 kts) cruise speed • 4 blade metal propeller • 90 km range • 15 dollars/hour

  11. Overview • Motivation for low-frequency measurements of acoustic properties of sediments • Experimental setup • Introduction of the aircraft as a low-frequency sound source • Experiments off La Jolla, CA • Beamforming results • Conclusions

  12. Aircraft as a source of low-frequency sound • Propeller noise gives tonal set with usable frequency range from  80-1000 Hz. • Inexpensive and highly mobile source of low frequency sound. • Motion of aircraft gives characteristic Doppler shift.

  13. Using Doppler-shifted frequency to identify individual rays • Each ray is launched with a different frequency • The ray retains that frequency along its entire path fDmax fD f0

  14. Sound Speed Using Doppler Shift • Use direct ray • Received frequency is a function of local sound speed • Higher local sound speeds result in lower Doppler shifts

  15. Measurement of sediment attenuation • Use direct ray • Compare received level at different times – i.e. different pathlengths in the sediment • Received level is a function of • Attenuation along ray path • Ray spreading

  16. Water column measurements • Estimate the Reflection Coefficient as a function of grazing angle by comparing direct and reflected ray • Ray spreading • Attenuation along ray path • Critical angle region gives c,. • Near-normal incidence gives ρ. cs  ρ

  17. Overview • Motivation for low-frequency measurements of acoustic properties of sediments • Experimental setup • Introduction of the aircraft as a low-frequency sound source • Experiments off La Jolla, CA • Beamforming results • Conclusions

  18. Experiments • Series of 5 experiments were conducted off the coast of La Jolla to test the feasibility of an aircraft as a source for underwater acoustics experiments • Needed to determine the potential for received signals in the water and the sediment

  19. Data from July 2, 2002 • Temperature and pressure profile (Sea-Bird T&P Profiler SBE 39) • Microphone 1 m above the air/sea interface • 7 Hydrophones spanning much of the 15 m water column • Buried hydrophone

  20. Some Preliminary Resultsfor Sediment Sound Speeds • Used minimization technique with a cost function that maximized power along Doppler shift curve • Started with microphone data – get v, h, ca, t0 and f0 • Proceeded to water column and sediment to get cw,cs

  21. Application of Minimization Technique to Air Data • Microphone data • Predicts average sound speed in air (342.3 m/s) consistent with temperature conditions (343.5m/s) • Showed a flight direction bias of about 5 m/s, consistent with a wind effect (verified in GPS data) • Average aircraft velocity (54.5 m/s) in good agreement with average velocity from GPS data (54.8 m/s)

  22. Water and Sediment Data • Water data • Acoustic data • ĉ = 1529.5 m/s •  = 23.4 m/s • Sea-Bird data • ĉ = 1512.4 m/s • Sediment data • Acoustic data • ĉ = 1649 m/s •  = 23.6 m/s

  23. Overview • Motivation for low-frequency measurements of acoustic properties of sediments • Experimental setup • Introduction of the aircraft as a low-frequency sound source • Experiments off La Jolla, CA • Beamforming results • Conclusions

  24. Beamforming on data • Diamond data (top) from 10/20/03, Cessna data (center) from 10/15/03 and simulated data (bottom) • Using all-in-one beamforming and looking at the high frequency bins (narrow main lobe) • Clear CPA offsets • 5 m on Diamond • 23 m on Cessna • Aircraft tracking • Reflection coefficient

  25. Some concerns… • Studying a 2-D problem but in reality it’s 3-D • Surface roughness • Stable source?

  26. Conclusions • Sound from an aircraft can be detected at reasonable levels in the water column and in the sediment • Measurement of the Doppler shift gives air/water/sediment sound speed estimates • Measurements of attenuation and dispersion may also be possible • Ability to do sediment and watersound speed measurements simultaneously • Aircraft tracking and reflection coefficient through beam forming • Using a model to better understand environment

  27. Acknowledgments Eric Giddens Michael Buckingham ONR ARCS Foundation Thomas Hahn

More Related