1 / 31

EXT Beam Measurements & Corrections

EXT Beam Measurements & Corrections. Dispersion, Coupling, Beta Matching. ATF / ATF2 Schematic Layout. Emittance Measurement 5 × WS, 4 × OTR 10 μ W wires (x/y/+10°/-10°). Final Doublet. Coupling Correction. Final Focus. β -match. Dump. Inflector. Laserwire. EXT. INJ. Laserwire.

cheveyo-gimenez
Download Presentation

EXT Beam Measurements & Corrections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EXT Beam Measurements & Corrections Dispersion, Coupling, Beta Matching M. Woodley

  2. ATF / ATF2 Schematic Layout Emittance Measurement 5 × WS, 4 × OTR 10 μ W wires (x/y/+10°/-10°) Final Doublet Coupling Correction Final Focus β-match Dump Inflector Laserwire EXT INJ Laserwire PIP WS 10 μ W wires (x/y/45°) 5 μ C wires (y/+1.3°/-1.3°) IPBSM 10 μ W wires (x/y) screen Damping Ring Beam Transport FOBO XSR e- S-band RF Gun 1.3 GeV S-band Linac 120 m M. Woodley

  3. Parameters • Injector system and Damping Ring can provide single-bunch beam or multi-bunch beam • up to Q=2×1010 • 1-20 bunches per train • 1, 2, or 3 trains • Minimum Damping Ring emittances achieved (c.2004) • εx = 1.5 nm • εy = 4 pm • Y. Honda, et al., PRL92(2004)054802 M. Woodley

  4. EMITTANCE & couplingMeasurement & Correction M. Woodley

  5. XSR SRIF σy ~ 5 μm σy ~ 5 μm LW 00 mode σy = 4.1 μm ATF2 design 01 mode σy = 3.2 μm M. Woodley

  6. QM7R: pole-tip radius = 16 mm … extracted beam offset = 22.5 mm Tokin 3393 (Ф = 32 mm) M. Woodley

  7. QM7R replaced with larger bore (Ф = 42 mm) quadrupole in January 2009 • K1L = 0.3 m-1 = 0.76  nominal • optics mismatch • K2L = 46.6 m-2 • x-y coupling for vertically off-axis beam: factor ~ 2-3 × yfor y = 1 mm (εx:εy = 100:1) • K1L = 0.392 m-1 = 0.99 × nominal • K2L = 1 m-2 Measured PRIAM simulation K0L K1L K2L Tokin 3581 (Ф = 42 mm) Tokin 3393 (Ф = 32 mm) M. Woodley

  8. Observed that first 2 EXT vertical correctors (ZV1X and ZV2X) needed to be strong to properly launch into EXT (since before EXT rebuild for ATF2 … ) • hypothesize that correctors are compensating for a kick error in extraction channel • simulate error kick by rolling individual elements; use ZV1X and ZV2X to correct orbit • find error that gives best fit to actual ZV1X/ZV2X values → BS3X septum magnet roll • BS3X was physically rolled ~ -4 mrad (March 17, 2010) to relieve ZV1X and ZV2X • projected vertical emittance in EXT before coupling correction was improved (~20-40 pm before → ~10-20 pm after) BS3X roll = 4.66 mrad Izv1 = -6.918 (-6.976) amp Izv2 = 1.270 ( 0.965) amp chi2 = 0.3102 M. Woodley

  9. Horizontal EXT Emittance Measurements Vertical EXT Emittance Measurements Anomalous DR → EXT vertical emittance growth fixed (?) M. Woodley

  10. SQ SQ WS WS WS WS WS SQ SQ OTR OTR OTR OTR – x – y 90° 90° 180° 90° 90° 90° 11° 17° 28° 29° 42° 43° 29° 29° Δψ 78.2 10.3 151.2 6.9 86.3 12.0 149.3 6.8 84.3 12.1 σ (μm) ILC “orthonormal” coupling correction system 7 < σx/σy < 22 10° wire orientation is optimal for beam tilt measurement M. Woodley

  11. Coupling correction: single skew quadrupole scan EmitY (pm) • projected vertical emittance (εy) reduced to 11.5 pm using QK1X • required 57 individual wire scans per QK1X setting • X (MW1X / MW2X / MW3X / MW4X) × 3 • Y (MW0X / MW1X / MW2X / MW3X / MW4X) × 3 • +10° (MW0X / MW1X / MW2X / MW3X / MW4X) × 3 • -10° (MW0X / MW1X / MW2X / MW3X / MW4X) × 3 • elapsed time: 7 hours for 5-point scan (!) … need multi-OTR to speed up • realistically: 90 minutes for one 5-point QK scan (4 Y wires × 3 scans at each point) M. Woodley

  12. Couplingmeasurements in ATF2 EXT (1) [Cecile Rimbault] • Projectedbeam size measurementsat x, 80o, y and 100oat 4 wire-scanner positions varying the strengthof the QK1X skewquadrupole • Coupling reconstruction using: • Verificationof the consistency of 80o and 100omeasurements • Searchfor an algorithmto reconstruct the beammatrixat QK1X position: • The more reliablemethodconsists of: a. Constrain 6 elementswiths33fits b. Constrain 3 elementswiths13fits c. Constrain the last one withs11fits M. Woodley

  13. Couplingmeasurements in ATF2 EXT (2) [Cecile Rimbault] at QK1X Comparisonbetweenmeasurements and beammatrix reconstruction result propagation s33 s13 • - physical results but large error bars (not to mention imaginary εy!) • large number of data sets is required to minimize statistical errors • analysis algorithm must guarantee positive-definite beam matrix M. Woodley

  14. All 4 OTRs installed as of June 1 Target inserters, movers, cameras, controls, software … all OK All 4 OTR targets melted during checkout! • thin aluminized mylar target (1200 Å Al) • Prosilica camera (3.75 μm / pixel) M. Woodley

  15. ATF2 EXT OTR1 • June 2, 2010 • single bunch beam • Q ≈ 4×109 e-/bunch (0.64 nC) • 1.56 Hz • σx ≈ 140 μm ; σy ≈ 10 μm • 2 μm nitrocellulose / 1200 Å Al • ~4 minutes in beam until damage pixels ok … • damaged targets will be replaced • 6 μm kapton / 1200 Å Al • 100 μm Al foil • 10 μm tungsten X/Y wires will be added to target holders pixels scribe line … melted pixels M. Woodley

  16. DispersionMeasurement & Correction M. Woodley

  17. Flight Simulator Dispersion Measurement / Correction M. Woodley

  18. Horizontal Dispersion Correction Response Matrix Measurement After Correction Before Correction ηx η'x IQF1X (amp) IQF6X (amp) M. Woodley

  19. Vertical Dispersion Correction (FD-phase) QS1X QS2X “Sum-Knob”: IQS1X = IQS2X Δ Sum-Knob = -0.15 A IP-phase FD-phase Simulated ηy* (right) and η'y* (right), back-propagated from IP M. Woodley

  20. Summary of Vertical Dispersion at IP 2010/ 2/ 18 10mm at IP The old orbit had a large offset around QF21X, QM16FF. I applied careful orbit tuning around QF21X, QM16FF with FF mover. 2010/ 2/ 25 1mm at IP We used the fast kicker for the beam extraction. 2010/ 3/ 18 2mm at post-IP We switched back to SLAC kicker. 2010/ 4/ 7 3.8mm at post-IP 2010/ 4/ 8 3.6mm at post-IP 3.6mm at IP Dispersion for 4/7 QS1X= -1A QS2X= -1A Dispersion for 4/8 QS1X= -2.8A QS2X= -2.8A IP dispersion is not sensitive to Sum-knob From Okugi-san’s presentation (ATF Ops 2010.04.09) M. Woodley

  21. BETA MATCHING M. Woodley

  22. “Irwin Knobs” Final Focus R0 “Irwin Knobs” for β-matching : R = RI × R0 alpha knob beta knob phase knob RI = waist shift magnification phase shift (α*  0) M. Woodley

  23. get initial magnet strengths from control system, compute R0 • for a desired knob type, compute RI(n) for a small step in s, m, or ψ • small steps required due to nonlinear ΔKLQ/ΔKnob • set R=RI(n)*R0 to make one knob step • use MAD matching to fit to desired elements of R using FF matching quadrupoles • changes to magnet strengths tend to be symmetric in the knob value … computed strengths for quadrupoles that start at zero tend to go bipolar • tried waist shift and magnification knobs during tuning week … seem OK M. Woodley

  24. Vertical Waist Scan (±5β*) [BX10BY10 optics] IP Twiss Parameters QM*FF Currents (amps) M. Woodley

  25. Vertical Magnification Scan (0.5-2) [BX10BY10 optics] IP Twiss Parameters QM*FF Currents (amps) M. Woodley

  26. Vertical Phase Scan (0-90°) [BX10BY10 optics] IP Twiss Parameters QM*FF Currents (amps) M. Woodley

  27. QK1X QK2X QK3X QK4X R0 “Irwin Knobs” for coarse coupling correction: R = RI × R0 RI = M. Woodley

  28. Summary (1) • improvements made to both hardware and diagnostics may have cured the anomalous vertical emittance growth at extraction from the Damping Ring that has been observed for many years • QM7R replacement • BS3X roll • DR emittance diagnostics (XSR, SRIF, LW) • the new EXT multi-OTR system should improve our ability to measure and correct emittance • faster emittance measurement and skew quad optimization • possibility of 4D beam-matrix measurement / reconstruction / correction • Flight Simulator dispersion measurement / correction software seems to work • excellent improvements in BPM resolution and reliability make it possible • propagation of dispersion fits to wire scanners, IP, PIP, etc. • correction of FD-phase ηy with sum-knob • model-based ηx correction with QF1X/QF6X sometimes has trouble, but “manual” correction works • jitter-based (SVD) dispersion measurement / monitoring still a possibility M. Woodley

  29. Summary (2) • Flight Simulator “Irwin” knobs provide possibility of orthogonal “manual” β-matching • QM*FF only … FF / FD magnets can remain at design strengths • orthogonal waist and β control • orthogonal phase control … intriguing possibilities (vertical dispersion, feedback, … ) • control of IP x-y and x'-y coupling may also be possible M. Woodley

  30. Ongoing Work (1) • need to archive future EXT multi-wire and multi-OTR emittance measurements • raw beam sizes, raw dispersion data, wire-to-wire and IEX to MW0X R-matrices • analysis results (with errors) • coupling measurement / 4D beam reconstruction • acquire full data set (X/Y/U/+10/-10) plus raw data files for all EXT wires • cross-check raw data normalization and who’s who … is everything OK now? • acquire OTR beam images for all EXT OTRs and extract lengths of semi-major and semi-minor axes and ellipse tilt angles • try 4D reconstruction … Ilya Agapov’s “Cholesky decomposition” method? • consistency checks for emittance and Twiss • forward propagate from EXT • backward propagate from IP • Flight Simulator computer control of Damping Ring RF frequency ramp M. Woodley

  31. Ongoing Work (2) • find a better “coarse” IP-phase ηy knob • closed bump in FF matching quadrupole region? • generate in Damping Ring? • is there a way to use the “Kubo bump” to control IP-phase vertical dispersion? • Flight Simulator “Irwin” knob development • GUI • FF optics with all QM*FF ON at reasonable currents • coupling knobs • revisit SLAC epoxy kicker multipoles (if we don’t switch to fast stripline extraction permanently) • are observed EXT BMAG values consistent? • why are vertical bumps at KEX1 closed? are the kickers identical? • is there a way to use the “Kubo bump” to control IP-phase vertical dispersion? • and on and on … M. Woodley

More Related