1 / 7

Measures of Effectiveness

Measures of Effectiveness. Ruth Rentch Office of Project Development and Environmental Review. Why do It?. Coaching Division Offices and State DOTs Address Legal compliance (to be included in legal sufficiency reviews) Assess effectiveness of 6002 requirements.

chesna
Download Presentation

Measures of Effectiveness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measures of Effectiveness Ruth Rentch Office of Project Development and Environmental Review

  2. Why do It? • Coaching Division Offices and State DOTs • Address Legal compliance (to be included in legal sufficiency reviews) • Assess effectiveness of 6002 requirements

  3. What do we mean by Effectiveness? • Comparison between pre-and post-SAFETEA-LU • Fulfilling the SAFETEA-LU intent • Effectiveness measured from Division Office perspective • Effectiveness ratings used

  4. Collecting this Data • Excel Spreadsheet records project milestone dates, lists of agencies, effectiveness ratings (actual number) • Effectiveness Ratings information will not be included in EDTS • HEPE staff will call to discuss basis for ratings given • HEPE will validate and analyze effectiveness rating data • HEPE will prepare accurate and detailed reports

  5. Challenges • Need to report a national “effectiveness” perspective based on project specific ratings • What needs to be changed? Are you really “already doing it”? • Does the 6002 process meet the expectation of expedited project reviews while still improving outcomes?

  6. Pilot Results (a sneak peek) • Project Initiation—mean=3.3 • Joint Lead Agencies—mean=2.9 • Participating Agencies—mean=2.9 • Coordination Plan—mean=2.3 • Public input on P&N—mean=2.2 • Public input on Alternative—mean=3.0 • Agency input on P&N, Alts—mean=3.6

  7. More to come…. • From overall HEPE sample collection— • Joint lead=3.5 • Participating agencies=3.6 • Coordination plan=3.2 • HEPE calls to Divisions in August • Effectiveness ratings may change over life of process.

More Related