6th July 2010
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 18

6th July 2010 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 95 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

6th July 2010. Reducing the toll of smoking-related disease and death: The case for tobacco harm reduction The rationale for establishing low-toxicity smokeless nicotine product policies: Why are the pros stronger than the cons? Lars Ramstrom Institute for Tobacco Studies, Sweden.

Download Presentation

6th July 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


6th july 2010

6th July 2010

Reducing the toll of smoking-related disease and death: The case for tobacco harm reductionThe rationale for establishing low-toxicity smokeless nicotine product policies: Why are the pros stronger than the cons?Lars RamstromInstitute for Tobacco Studies, Sweden


Reduction of harm from tobacco use is a top priority in public health

Reduction of harm from tobacco useis a top priority in public health.

But,”Tobacco Harm Reduction”is a controversial issue.


Tobacco harm reduction is mainly a matter of replacing cigarettes by a less harmful tobacco product

Tobacco Harm Reductionis mainly a matter of replacing cigarettes by a less harmful tobacco product.

”Low-tar” cigarettes are no candidates forharm reduction,

but some ”low-toxicity” smokeless tobacco products are.

One such product, Swedish SNUS, is dominating the debate on Tobacco Harm Reduction.


6th july 2010

Opponents of Tobacco Harm Reductiongenerally agree that switching to Snus can yield substantial reduction of tobacco-induced diseases for thoseINDIVIDUALSwho do thereby abstain from cigarettes,

  • but, there are concerns that unintended effects can incur negative effects onPUBLIC HEALTH.


Some concerns

Some concerns:

Is there a risk that snus serves as a gateway to smoking and thereby increases smoking?

 snus becomes an additional use rather than a replacement?

 nicotine addiction is strengthened by snus use?

 snus is ineffektive as cessation aid?

 snus use will weaken smokers’ effort to quit smoking?


What can we learn by the evidence from swedish population studies

What can we learn by the evidence from Swedish population studies?


6th july 2010

5.4% of all cases of onset of daily tobacco use

Remaining ”secondary” smokers: 0.7% of all men

Starting to smoke after onset of snus use is a very rare option − and most of those cases, 76%, end up by quitting smoking.


6th july 2010

Continuing daily dual users are a minority (12%) of all dual initiators and constitute just 1.8% of all men.


Is nicotine addiction strengthened by switching to snus

Is nicotine addiction strengthened by switching to snus?

  • Nicotine addictiveness is mainly determined by the speed of delivery to the brain.

  • Nicotine delivery from snus is substantially slower than from cigarettes.

  • Snus use would therefore be deemed as less addictive than cigarette smoking.


6th july 2010

About a third of smokers who start snus use do subsequently quit all daily use of nicotine. This is not compatible with the idea that snus use were strengthening nicotine addiction.


6th july 2010

  • Rate of quitting daily smoking:

  • never snus: 57%

  • secondary snus use: 87%

  • secondary smoking: 76%


Will snus use weaken smokers efforts to quit smoking

Will snus use weaken smokers’ efforts to quit smoking?


Efforts to quit smoking are manifested in quit attempts

Efforts to quit smoking are manifested in quit attempts.

  • In the FSI / ITS study all Ever Daily Smokers were asked: “Have you ever made a serious attempt to quit smoking?”

  • The odds of having made a quit attempt at the time of the survey were significantly higher for those primary daily smokers who had subsequently started daily snus use as compared to those who had not.

  • OR for men 2.22, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.81

  • OR for women 2.98, 95% CI 1.74 to 5.12


6th july 2010

Smokers who have started subsequent snus use appear to make more efforts to quit smoking than those who have not.


Summary

SUMMARY

  • There is little or no scientific evidence to support arguments against Tobacco Harm Reduction.

  • There is a good deal of scientific evidence to reject arguments against Tobacco Harm Reduction.

  • There is a good deal of scientific evidence to support arguments for Tobacco Harm Reduction.


  • Login