1 / 51

Decision Support System

RP Group Conference 2014 April 10 th , 2014. Decision Support System. Dr. William Scroggins President Dr. Irene Malmgren Vice President of Instruction Bob Hughes Director, Enterprise Applications Systems Daniel Lamoree Sr. Systems Analyst/Programmer. The Role of Executive Leadership.

cheng
Download Presentation

Decision Support System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RP Group Conference 2014 April 10th, 2014 Decision Support System Dr. William Scroggins President Dr. Irene Malmgren Vice President of Instruction Bob Hughes Director, Enterprise Applications Systems Daniel Lamoree Sr. Systems Analyst/Programmer

  2. The Role of Executive Leadership • President’s Cabinet • Decision Support System given high priority • Regular updates to Cabinet • Instruction Team • Demonstration of application to Deans • Gather Feedback

  3. IT and Research Collaboration • Information Technology staff goal – protect the data; restrict access • Researchers goal – more data leads to better decision-making • When these units are in different divisions, the need for cooperation and collaboration is critical

  4. The approach at Mt. SAC • Data Users Group (DUG) meeting – every 2 weeks • Researchers Data Warehouse (RDW) instance of the Banner Database • Report Designer access to Argos DEV • SQL training of Researchers by IT Staff

  5. Leveraging Talent • Director of RIE recognized a team member with a unique aptitude for programming • Director of EAS (Enterprise Resource Applications) responded to a need for a Decision Support System • Best solution – temporary reassignment of a researcher to IT as a programmer • Located in IT • Build trust with other IT staff • Improved access to data

  6. Learning Objectives • How Mt. SAC calculates FTES Targets • How Mt. SAC decides sections to add or cut • How Mt. SAC Deans develop prospective schedules

  7. Mt. SAC Story: Lost FTES

  8. Scheduling 2014-2015 Overview • Top-Down Approach • Get Annual FTES Target • Distribute Annual Target between CR, ENHC_NC, NC • Grow only Credit? Distribute as before? • Distribute CR, ENHC_NC, NC among Terms • Grow Summer (yes, please)? Fall? Winter? Spring? • Distribute FTES among Divisions . . .

  9. Annual Targeting • Example • Funded FTES for Prior Year = 29371.99 • Growth = 3.5% • Unfunded FTES for Prior Year = 400 • ((29371.99 * 1.035) – 400) = 30000 • CR: 27000 (90%), 2400 ENHC_NC (8%), 600 NC (2%) • 10% Summer; 42% Fall; 8% Winter; 40% Spring • Of 10% Summer: 36.22% HSS; . . .

  10. Annual Targeting

  11. Annual Targeting

  12. Annual Targeting

  13. Annual Targeting

  14. Annual Targeting • Just one catch . . .

  15. Moving Target

  16. Minimizing Spring Uncertainty • Knowns • Sections Scheduled for Spring • Scheduled Hours per Section for Spring • Historical Fill Rate for Spring • Unknowns • Future Contact Hours (Fill Rate for WSCH/DSCH or PACH) • Mt. SAC Decision • Projection

  17. Projection: Weighted Averages

  18. Does the projection work?

  19. Does the projection work?

  20. Does the projection work?

  21. Does the projection work?

  22. What happened? • No variance in pervious years; easy to project when fill rates hover around 100% (after drops and adds) • What now? • More robust model, an actual predictive model • Will that help given downward trends? Always 1 year or term behind? • Maintain Agility • Reporting via Argos and APEX • Sandboxing via APEX

  23. APEX • Highlights • Oracle’s primary tool for developing Web applications using SQL and PL/SQL • Only requires web browser to develop • No cost option of the Oracle Database

  24. Reports • What sections should we add? • Demand • 90%+ Fill • Waitlists • Registration Acceleration • What sections should we cut? • Lagging Sections • Registration Acceleration • What else? • Room Usage • Excluded CRNs

  25. Demand 90%+ Fill

  26. Response?

  27. Waitlists

  28. Registration Acceleration

  29. Lagging Courses

  30. Lagging Courses

  31. Room Usage

  32. Excluded CRNs From 320

  33. Sandbox

  34. Sandbox

  35. Sandbox

  36. Sandbox

  37. Sandbox

  38. Sandbox

  39. Sandbox

  40. Sandbox

  41. Sandbox

  42. Sandbox

  43. Sandbox

  44. Sandbox

  45. Sandbox

  46. Sandbox

  47. Sandbox

  48. Sandbox

  49. Sandbox

  50. Sandbox

More Related