Role playng interrogatorio l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 20

ROLE PLAYNG INTERROGATORIO PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 57 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

ROLE PLAYNG INTERROGATORIO. Marco Cannavicci. Tipologia delle fonti. “cooperative and friendly” – scarsa resistenza, risponde liberamente; l’interrogante rischia di allentare il controllo;

Download Presentation

ROLE PLAYNG INTERROGATORIO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Role playng interrogatorio l.jpg

ROLE PLAYNG INTERROGATORIO

Marco Cannavicci


Tipologia delle fonti l.jpg

Tipologia delle fonti

  • “cooperative and friendly” – scarsa resistenza, risponde liberamente; l’interrogante rischia di allentare il controllo;

  • “neutral and nonpartisan” – bassa collaborazione, si limita a rispondere alle domande; l’interrogante deve insistere sugli obiettivi informativi;

  • “hostile and antagonistic” - rifiuta di rispondere e sfida l’interrogante che deve avere self-control, pazienza e tatto (timely)


Slide3 l.jpg

“the successful interrogator is a skilled professional who is able to rapidly evaluate sources of information and adapt his approach and techniques accordingly”


2 personal qualities l.jpg

2. Personal qualities

  • “motivation”

  • “alertness”

  • “patience and tact”

  • “credibility”

  • “objectivity”

  • “self-control”

  • “adaptability”

  • “perseverance”

  • “appearence and demeanor”

  • “initiative”


Slide5 l.jpg

“The interrogator has a position

of authority over the source.

The source realizes this fact,

in some cases, believes his future

might depend upon his association

with the interrogator.”


Assessing sources l.jpg

Assessing sources

COOPERATION LEVELCODE

Responds to direct question 1

Responds hesitantly 2

Does not respond3

KNOWLEDGEABILITY LEVELCODE

To possess pertinent informationA

Might have pertinent informationB

Does not appear to have pertinent infoC


A planning and preparation l.jpg

a. Planning and preparation

In base alle valutazioni di “collection and screening”:

  • stabilire gli obiettivi informativi

  • preparare la sequenza delle domande

  • ipotizzare il tipo di approccio

  • indicare opportune modalità di gestione logistica della fonte alle guardie (alloggio, cibo, vestiario, …)


B approach phase l.jpg

b. Approach phase

  • Rapport postures

    • stern posture

    • sympathetic posture

  • Developing rapport

    • smooth transitions

    • sincere and convincing

    • recognize the breaking point


Interrogator l.jpg

Interrogator

  • Establish and mantain CONTROL over the source and interrogation

  • Establish and mantain RAPPORT between the interrogator and source

  • MANIPULATE the source’s emotions and weaknesses to gain his willing cooperation


Slide10 l.jpg

Under no circumstances will the interrogator betray surprise at anything the EPW might say. Many EPWs will talk freely if they feel the information they are discussing is already known to the interrogator. If the interrogator acts surprised, the EPW may stop talking immediately.


Approach combinations l.jpg

Approach combinations:

- Direct

- Incentive

- Emotional

- love

- hate

- Increased fear-up

- fear-down

- Pride and ego

- ego-up

- ego-down


Approach l.jpg

Approach

  • Futility

  • We know all

  • File and dossier

  • Establish your identity

  • Repetition

  • Rapid fire

  • Silent

  • Change of scene


C questioning phase l.jpg

c. Questioning phase

  • Direct questions

  • Follow-up questions

    • Hot

    • Cold

  • Nonpertinent questions

  • Repeated questions

  • Control questions

  • Prepared questions


Questions to avoid l.jpg

Questions to avoid

  • Leading questions

  • Negative questions

  • Compound questions

  • Vague questions


Questioning sequence l.jpg

Questioning sequence

  • Map tracking

  • Establish a route

  • Segment and exploit the route

  • Exploit dispositions not on route

  • Recording information

  • Taking notes

    • Using his own notes

    • Using a sound or video recorder


D termination phase l.jpg

d. Termination phase

  • Reasons for termination

    • La fonte permane non cooperativa

    • La fonte è ferita o ammalata

    • Sono richiesti più periodi di interrogatorio

    • La fonte cambia atteggiamento e l’interrogatore perde il controllo

    • Gli obiettivi informativi sono stati soddisfatti

  • Termination procedures


E reporting information l.jpg

e. Reporting information

  • compilazione della modulistica allestita per l’inoltro delle informazioni

  • tempestivo inoltro delle informazioni alle sezioni di analisi strategica, operativa o tattica


Interrogare con un interprete l.jpg

Interrogare con un interprete

  • sono richiesti tempi maggiori

  • l’interprete va “preparato”

  • vengono mantenute le 5 fasi del processo informativo

  • l’interprete ripete anche le modalità di approccio (pause, tono voce, postura, …)

  • dopo l’interrogatorio, deve essere valutato anche l’interprete


Slide19 l.jpg

  • Interpretation methods

    • Simultaneous

    • Alternate

  • Interpreter briefing

  • Conduct the interrogation


Slide20 l.jpg

GRAZIE

PER LA VOSTRA

ATTENZIONE

Marco Cannavicci

[email protected]


  • Login