the coming of age of collaborative fundraising
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
The Coming of Age of Collaborative Fundraising

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 26

The Coming of Age of Collaborative Fundraising - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 130 Views
  • Uploaded on

The Coming of Age of Collaborative Fundraising. June 18, 2014. The Rise of Collaborative Fundraising. “…a joint effort of two or more groups to raise more money than either group could alone.” Kim Klein, publisher & editor, Grassroots Fundraising Journal. Current USA Giving Trend.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' The Coming of Age of Collaborative Fundraising' - chandra-vaikunth


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the rise of collaborative fundraising
The Rise of Collaborative Fundraising
  • “…a joint effort of two or more groups to raise more money than either group could alone.”

Kim Klein, publisher & editor, Grassroots Fundraising Journal

current usa giving trend
Current USA Giving Trend
  • 2013- $337 Billion

Giving increased by 4.4% over last year

    • 72%- Individuals
    • 15% - Foundations
    • 8% -Bequests
    • 5% - Corporations

Giving USA

slide4

Education grew the most 8.9%

  • Health, environmental,

animal- related and arts 6-8.5%

  • Giving to Religion and by Companies continues to slow
  • The wealthy are becoming more confident to give

Giving USA

who is benefitting
Who is benefitting?
  • "When stock values are high, it makes a huge difference in the amount of money going into education, but it has little or no impact on religious donations, which rely on lots of small gifts from individuals.“

Info provided by The Atlas of Giving

more n c non profits
More N.C. Non-Profits
  • Total as of Feb. 2007: over 86,000
  • Total as of Nov. 2008: 91,971
  • Total as of Dec. 2011: 105,150
  • Total as of Dec. 2013: 108,301
  • 26% increasein 6 years!

Info provided by North Carolina Secretary of State\'s Office

robust growth for non profits
Robust Growth for Non-Profits
  • 2010 – North Carolina

10% of workforce is non-profits

400,000 paid employees

  • 2013- USA

44% of NFPs plan to create new positions

20% plan to freeze, reduce or eliminate positions

North Carolina Philanthropy Journal

Non-Profit HR Solutions

challenging conditions
Challenging Conditions
  • More Non-profits vying
  • Non-profits ok with operational fundraising…struggling with capital fundraising
  • Harder to get donor attention
  • In spite of stock market, still cautious mood among many major donors
  • Non-profits very careful about over-reaching in setting fundraising goals
the rise of collaborative fundraising1
The Rise of Collaborative Fundraising
  • “…a joint effort of two or more groups to raise more money than either group could alone.”

Kim Klein, publisher & editor, Grassroots Fundraising Journal

what collaborative fundraising is not
What Collaborative Fundraising is NOT
  • Teaming to support a worthy project where there is no direct benefit back to the organization
  • Fundraising by budget allocation rather than actual fundraising
example 1
Example #1
  • Sea Pines Montessori and Hilton Head Prep- late 1990s
  • Collaborated in a capital campaign
  • To fund a common facility and entrance
  • Successful due to:
      • Big common goal
      • Strong leadership
      • Rules of engagement
slide14

“Joint fundraising is probably the most difficult form of non-profit collaborations. And the results are far from certain. I think the risk/reward perception is still not where it would need to be to make it attractive for most.”

Jonathan Howard, co-founder, Cause & Effect consulting services

major donor confided
Major Donor confided…
  • “We once did a collaborative gift to well-known project and that was the beginning of the end of the place as the agencies fought over control of the funds.  Kind of like throwing a steak over the fence at the dog pound.”
collaborative fundraising works well when groups
Collaborative Fundraising works well when groups:
  • Share a similar BIG vision
  • Share a similar culture and often size
  • Commitment to joint planning to work through issues in advance
  • Trust each other (Board chairs often insure good feelings permeate)
  • Develop a written agreement about money & labor
  • Are perceived to be equally invested
  • Agreement on how funds raised are allocated to achieve campaign objectives
example 2
Example #2
  • A North Carolina Community College wants to fund a Manufacturing Training Center
  • Invited Collaborative Partners (Schools, Chamber of Commerce, Industry, County, plus the College as lead)
  • Feasibility Study encouraging:
    • A paradigm change for county
    • Unifying
    • Attracting major leaders
a big vision
A BIG Vision
  • “A Big vision is probably the most critical factor. A Big vision compels everyone (organizations & donors) to look beyond their own capabilities.“

Jeffrey Ouellette, director of development, Central Square Theatre, Cambridge M.A.

when it works well continued
When it works Well…continued
  • The reward must be greater than if each group had attempted on its own.
  • Marketing benefit: elevates the project well beyond what a single organization could achieve.
  • Collaborative fundraising allows groups to access a larger audience and donor pool.
  • A joint funding arm (committee) generally works to identify, cultivate and solicit joint prospects.
  • Each group solicits their own prospects, but certain donors are solicited ‘jointly.’
  • Able to access bigger donors and avoid ‘nickeling and diming.’
example 3
Example #3
  • Midlands Gives- a wonderful collaborative effort
    • Unifying BIG IDEA
    • Strong leadership and credibility of CCCF
    • Clear objectives
    • Low risk – avoids donor confusion
when collaborative fundraising does not work well groups
When Collaborative Fundraising does NOT work well, groups:
  • Do not have the resources to meet the campaign readiness steps
  • Fear losing their donors
  • Can not find the right groups to work with
  • Lack of commitment of time to collaborate
  • Boards and staff do not trust each other
  • Can not agree on who to solicit jointly, and how to allocate funds raised
in summary what makes the difference
In Summary: What Makes the Difference
  • A BIG Vision
  • Strong volunteer leadership that is confident, and insists on ‘trust’
  • When the groups know that their major donor prospects like ‘Collaborative Fundraising.’
  • Keeping the collaboration clear (and simple)
  • Advance written ‘rules of engagement.’
example 4
Example #4
  • Buncombe County Five Greenways, plus City, County, and Friends of Connect Buncombe
    • Goal: Raise a nucleus fund of possibly several million for matching grants for specific greenways
    • By joining together can raise and leverage more support from funders (DOT, Tiger Grants, CDBG, LWCF, etc.)
what to collaborate on
What to Collaborate on
  • Joint campaign planning team
  • Advance project and community assessment
  • Advance PR and marketing
  • Case development
  • Consulting
  • Feasibility study
  • Campaign coordinator
  • Office and back-office
  • Cultivation event(s)
  • Lead gift solicitations
  • Grant writing
  • PR & Marketing
  • Campaign events & Celebration
  • Project Management
sample collaborative fundraising organizational chart
Sample: Collaborative Fundraising Organizational Chart

Lead

Org. A

Org. B

Org. C

Joint Funding Committee

Campaign Steering Committee

Campaign Director & Coordinator

  • Prospect Evaluation
  • Lead & Challenge Gift
  • Other identified prospects to be solicited jointly:

Phases

Board

Staff

Former Bd. Lead

High Major

Major

Foundation

Gift-in-kind

Public

Board

Staff

Former Bd. Lead

High Major

Major

Foundation

Gift-in-kind

Public

Board

Staff

Former Bd. Lead

High Major

Major

Foundation

Gift-in-kind

Public

slide26

High Quality Results

On Schedule, Over Goal, and Within Budget

ad