1 / 17

Pylon : the securitization of weather risk on electricity distribution lines

Pylon : the securitization of weather risk on electricity distribution lines. WRMA, 04-November-2004, London. Agenda. Transaction Summary Learnings for the Weather Derivatives Market. Motivations for the transaction. Lothar & Martin = high cost for EDF (600 to 800 MEUR)

chaman
Download Presentation

Pylon : the securitization of weather risk on electricity distribution lines

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pylon : the securitization of weather risk on electricity distribution lines WRMA, 04-November-2004, London

  2. Agenda • Transaction Summary • Learnings for the Weather Derivatives Market

  3. Motivations for the transaction • Lothar & Martin = high cost for EDF (600 to 800 MEUR) • Main risk = windstorm on distribution lines • Lack of capacity on the traditional markets • Research of a multi–year solution • Research of a solution with a high credit profile • Research of a transparent solution

  4. Issuance structure EDF Financial Contract Premium CDC ICM Counterparty Contract Premium Up to Original Principal Amount at Redemption EURIBOR - []% Pylon Ltd. Class A&B Notes EURIBOR + []% CDC ICM Collateral Account Investment Income Original Principal Amount

  5. Transaction terms

  6. Summary of the Notes Class B Notes Class A Notes

  7. Definition of the index Windstorm Index Value = • The Maximum Calculated Peak-Gust Windspeed : computed through an interpolation process based on measurements from up to approximately 150 WMO (World Meteorological Organization) meteorological recording stations across the Covered Area.

  8. Geographical distribution of weights 0 . 0 - 0 . 1 0 . 1 - 0 . 5 0 . 5 - 1 . 0 1 . 0 - 2 . 0 2 . 0 - 4 . 5 Weight [%]

  9. Trigger mechanism After a First Event Before Any Trigger Event Class Bnotes EUR 120million Class Anotes EUR 70million Overall Annualized Attachment Probability 1.23% Class Bnotes Outstanding Principal Amount in Class B Notes Annualized LossProbability =2.51%

  10. Trigger mechanism Scenario 1 : Only 1 euro of the Class B notes is used by a First Event, the ITL drops down 2.51% Class B 3706 8200 Initial situation Class A 10820 0.48% 1.26% 5508 Class B 2.51% 10002 0.17% Class A 3706 6326 Scenario 2 : The Class B notes are completely redeemed following a First Event 0.87%

  11. Trigger mechanism Scenario 3 : EUR 60 million of the Class B notes are redeemed following a First Event 2.51% Class B 3706 5953 Initial situation Class A 8573 1.26% 5508 Class B 10002 0.17%

  12. A reduction of the tick • Mitigation of the risk by EDF  Need for a variation of the tick. • Example, the calculation of the Class B Principal Reduction Amount : • where BIC refers to the Class B notes Index Capacity (4494) After a First Event, ITL drops down Each anniversary year, the “rate of payment” (~the tick) is reduced

  13. Historical events 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Pre-Drop-down B Notes Exhaustion (for year 1): 10002 1999 Dec 27 Martin A Notes Exhaustion (for year 1) if B Notes are exhausted : 6326 6489 Index 1st Event Attachment: 5508 1999 Dec 26 Lothar 4945 1987 Oct 15 87J 2nd Event Attachment (Drop-down): 3706 3851 1990 Jan 25 Daria (90A) 1982 Nov 6 1976 Nov 30 3251 3220 3460 1967 March 12 1990 Feb 3 Herta 1947 1990 Feb 26 Vivian 1965 Nov 25 1970 Feb 10 1943 569 1003 790 Year of Windstorm Occurrence

  14. Agenda • Transaction Summary • Learnings for the Weather Derivatives Market

  15. Learnings from the client standpoint • A corporate approach (basis risk, innovative approach, need for a highly structured solution) • A non-USD solution • Necessary validation by legal & tax counsels, auditors, etc.. (need for a counsel). • Efficient communication (vs. derivatives)

  16. Learnings from the investors standpoint • Investors basis = almost without (re)insurance companies • Increasing number of hedge funds, specialized funds, etc.. • Interest from non-specialist investors (demand for « attractive underlyings ») • Convergence between weather derivatives / cat bonds • Specialized weather investors are advantaged • Recently, « frequent storms » are traded • Need for more out-of-the-money temperatures deals (e.g., frost deal) to attract non-specialist investors to the weather market

  17. Alternative Risk Structuring Tanguy Claquin e-mail : tclaquin@ixis-cib.com tel : +33 (0)1 58 55 10 44 Nicolas Mérigot e-mail : nmerigot@ixis-cib.com tel : +33 (0)1 58 55 10 37 Michel Quéruel e-mail : mqueruel@ixis-cib.com tel : +33 (0)1 58 55 10 41

More Related