1 / 30

Fragile States— EMIS, M&E, Approaches to Planning

Fragile States— EMIS, M&E, Approaches to Planning. IIEP Summer Training Paris July 24, 2009 Kurt D. Moses—Vice President & Director, AED. Introduction. The Framework—post-crisis to development Key Factors in Systems Rebuilding Specific Education Management Information Needs A Few Examples

chacha
Download Presentation

Fragile States— EMIS, M&E, Approaches to Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fragile States—EMIS, M&E, Approaches to Planning IIEP Summer Training Paris July 24, 2009 Kurt D. Moses—Vice President & Director, AED

  2. Introduction • The Framework—post-crisis to development • Key Factors in Systems Rebuilding • Specific Education Management Information Needs • A Few Examples • Emerging Options

  3. I. Post-Crisis to Development • They love their children—all of them. • They believe a sound education is a right. • They believe that parents can and should contribute • They try and take responsibility for their part in education • Higher/national/provincial levels have little effect at the local level—but are needed to interact with the biggest sources of funding

  4. Post-Conflict Still major humanitarian needs—external support Security limited Limited communication Minimal administrative structures No state structures of any consequence No personnel, policies, reimbursements, or effective rules Difficult to create a National Plan Development Humanitarian needs begin to be met internally Better security Better communication Early administrative structures (models of structure in place) Initial state structures Preliminary, simple guidelines and employed persons Draft National Plan—often mixed agreement I. Post-Crisis to Development

  5. II. Key Factors in Systems Rebuilding--Education • Establish Identity (without it, no measures of magnitude, no transparency) • Schools/Learning Spaces • Teachers (linked to schools/learning spaces) • Students 2. Resist exclusive focus on government—reach & measure other providers 3. Most issues are experienced locally and sub-nationally, even if discussed nationally 4. Establish acceptable accuracy—start simple, use “successive approximation.” 5. Focus on phasing—start from known to unknown, simple to more complex, proven versus experimental

  6. II. Key Factors in Systems Rebuilding—Education (2) 6. Fund planning & measurement—at least 5% of total expenditure & personnel 7. Simplify planning & outcomes focus: • Adequacy—sufficient for what is expected • Evenness—allocated as evenly as possible • Rapidity—monthly/quarterly timeframe, not years • Transparency—allow many to see the outcome & the basis 8. Ability to “deliver” will almost always “trump” the promise to do so

  7. Funding for EMIS • Too Little Money Overall • Too Little Money on Operations • Capital Investments too Sporadic • Imbalance of Investment—too little to Quality Assurance/ Analysis, too much on Collection

  8. III. Specific Education Management Information System Needs • Proven approach, simply presented • Incorporate modeling of good behavior • good definitions • clear process • good work habits • accuracy and care • Bring in experience when it is needed • Provide simple presentations—simple, not simplistic • Provide information at the lowest level—and at the highest—information to the person who can do something with it • Fast—address at least one, burning, short-term confusion or issue

  9. III. What EMIS Requires • Data must be interpreted, & then linked to direction & resources. Without it, mere activity • Planning should be phased to reflect: • the ability to understand • the ability to implement—both policy & delivery • the level of available, sufficiently accurate data • reasonable time-frame (personal, political, structural—QUESTION: How do you think about 20 years when you were elected for 2?)

  10. IV. A Few Examples

  11. Audience Analysis

  12. EMIS What Good EMIS Requires Practices People • Technology

  13. Pupil Teacher Ratio by SchoolKumi District

  14. Public Transparency

  15. Overall & Detail

  16. Sample--Comparative

  17. V. Emerging Options • New Techniques: • Cell telephone, PDAs, WiFi, WiMax, VSAT, Skype • Remote sensing • Ubiquitous laptops • Profiles targeted to Policy Initiatives • Planning Stories—focused & customized for local action • Planning “clusters” • Don’t forget, every crisis is an opportunity for MAJOR TRANSFORMATION

  18. What Emerging Options Require • Simple • Can they be used with minimal instruction • Multi-purpose • Like a cell phone, are there other reasons for keeping it going • Inexpensive • Typically, under $50—or, with subsidy, under $200 • Linked to something important • Easily replaced or repaired

  19. Southern Sudan

  20. Juba County

  21. Positional View—Central Equatoria

  22. Perisa Primary School

  23. Perisa Primary School

  24. Dashboard-- Key Indicators

  25. Big Change—Opportunity to Learn • School year length (850-1000 hrs.) • School open each instructional day & close by (1-3 km.) • Teacher is present all school hours • Student is present all school hours • Student/Teacher ratio workable (aver. 40/1) • Instructional materials are available & used (2:1 or 1:1 ratio) • Organized classroom & pedagogy—curriculum designed • Students reading by 2nd or 3rd grade

  26. QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION

  27. Kurt D. MosesVice President & Director, AED kmoses@aed.org +1 202 297 0864 +1 202 884 8275

  28. Advanced Data Visualization

More Related