Depletion region dynamics of an agata detector
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

Depletion Region Dynamics of an AGATA Detector PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 118 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Depletion Region Dynamics of an AGATA Detector. Steven Moon University of Liverpool. UNTF 2010, University of Salford 14 th -16 nd April 2010. • Overview. Background What is AGATA? Gamma Ray Tracking Pulse Shape Analysis Case for AGATA Role of the University of Liverpool AGATA Group

Download Presentation

Depletion Region Dynamics of an AGATA Detector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Depletion region dynamics of an agata detector

Depletion Region Dynamics of an AGATA Detector

Steven Moon

University of Liverpool

UNTF 2010, University of Salford

14th-16nd April 2010


Overview

• Overview

  • Background

    • What is AGATA?

      • Gamma Ray Tracking

      • Pulse Shape Analysis

      • Case for AGATA

  • Role of the University of Liverpool AGATA Group

    • Characterisation of AGATA detectors

    • Scan modes

    • Experimental setup


Overview cont

• Overview (cont.)

  • Some Scan Results

    • Experimental

    • Simulated

    • Experimental vs Simulated

  • Next Steps....


Background what is agata

• Background - What is AGATA?

  • AGATA – Advanced GAmmaTracking Array

    • 180 Coaxial HPGe Detectors, tapered to asymmetric hexagonal end → 36-fold Segmentation

    • 3 types of AGATA detector (all asymmetric)

      • REDmost asymmetric

      • GREEN

      • BLUEleast asymmetric

    • Arranged into ‘ball’, i.e. 4π ‘Spherical Honeycomb’ structure, around beam-target interaction position

    • Final array will consist of 60 ‘Triple-clusters’

6

5

4

3

D

2

C

E

1

F

B

A

(Images adapted from M. R. Dimmock, PhD Thesis, 2008)


Background established technology

• Background – Established technology

  • Established technology

    → Compton Suppression

  • Currently in use in facilities world wide

    → e.g. GAMMASPHERE @ ANL, USA

  • Good, but not that good....

    → discards many valuable events

    → Only accept events occurring completely

    within single HPGe detector volume....


Background gamma ray tracking

• Background – Gamma-Ray Tracking

  • Next-generation technology

    → Gamma-Ray Tracking

θ

ɣ-ray Source


Background pulse shape analysis

• Background – Pulse Shape Analysis

  • To accurately obtain θ, need accurate interaction positions...

    → Pulse Shape Analysis

    → Use core and segment charge pulses to

    determine (x, y, z) of interaction

    → Core and segment pulses give a unique

    ‘fingerprint’ for a given interaction position

1

2

2 ns samples

(Images adapted from C. Unsworth, Private Comm., 2010)


Background case for agata

• Background – Case for AGATA

  • Compared to current arrays, AGATA will:

    • Dramatically increase access to weakest signals from exotic nuclear events

      → up to factor of ≈1000 improvement in sensitivity

      → allow access to unseen channels in previously

      studied reactions

    • Complement new RIB facilities

      → Smaller reaction cross-sections

      → Higher levels of background


Role of the uol agata group

• Role of the UoL AGATA Group

  • Different aspects of AGATA project handled by different institutions across Europe

  • University of Liverpool AGATA Group:

    → Characterisation & Acceptance Testing

  • Scan AGATA detectors using various techniques

    • 137Cs Coincidence Scans

    • 137Cs Singles Scans

      • Front-face → Front-face Bias

      • Side

  • Aim is to provide confidence in Electric Field Simulations of AGATA detectors


Experimental setup

• Experimental Setup

  • Acquire in singles mode using mono-energetic 137Cs source

  • Scan detector on 2mm2 grid @ 30s per scan position

  • Demand fold-1 (i.e. 1 hit seg.) events of full (662keV 137Cs) energy

(Image adapted from M. R. Dimmock, PhD Thesis, 2008)


Results

• Results

  • Examine detected gamma-ray intensity (for Rings 1-6) at each x-y scan position

  • Repeat for various HV Bias Voltages

    (4500V, 4000V, 3000V, 2000V, 1500V, 1000V, 750V, 500V, 250V, 100V, 50V)

  • Compress 2mm scan data


Results1

• Results


Results cont

• Results (cont.)

  • Compare intensities to those at full (4500V) bias...


Mgs simulations

• MGS Simulations

  • Detector simulated for all experimental bias voltages using MGS (Multi-Geometry Simulation)

  • Impurity concentrations (supplied by Canberra)

    - Front: 0.65 x 10-10 cm-3

    - Back:1.4 x 10-10 cm-3

  • Image results in similar fashion...


Mgs simulations cont

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 4000V

 100% depleted


Mgs simulations cont1

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 3000V

 94.8% depleted


Mgs simulations cont2

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 2000V

 76.6% depleted


Mgs simulations cont3

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 1500V

 62.2% depleted


Mgs simulations cont4

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 1000V

 44.0% depleted


Mgs simulations cont5

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 750V

 33.8% depleted


Mgs simulations cont6

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 500V

 22.6% depleted


Mgs simulations cont7

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 250V

 10.4% depleted


Mgs simulations cont8

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 100V

 1.7% depleted


Mgs simulations cont9

• MGS Simulations (cont.)

Detector at 50V

 0.3% depleted


Experiment vs simulation

• Experiment vs Simulation


Experiment vs simulation1

• Experiment vs Simulation


Next steps

• Next Steps

  • Continue comparison of experimentally derived depletion volumes and MGS simulation

  • Compare experimental & simulated pulse shapes

  • Compare with other depletion simulations

    (e.g. using JASS, Maxwell 3D)

  • Compare with other measurements, e.g. C-V measurements conducted at University of Cologne

    (B. Birkenbach & B. Bruyneel, to be published)

     Does this method of scanning allow a practicable derivation of the crystal impurity concentration?


Questions comments

Questions & Comments...

Steven Moon1, D. Barrientos2, A.J. Boston1,

H. Boston1, S.J. Colosimo1, J. Cresswell1, D.S. Judson1

P.J. Nolan1, C. Unsworth1

1Department of Physics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZE, UK

2Laboratorio de Radiaciones Ionizantes, Universidad de Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain


Background compton suppression

• Background – Compton Suppression

Positive Core

  • Established technology

    → Compton Suppression

HPGe Detector Volume

BGO Shielding

ɣ-ray Source


Background compton suppression1

• Background – Compton Suppression

  • Established technology

    → Compton Suppression

    • GAMMASPHERE @ Argonne N.L., USA

    • JUROGAM @ Uni. of Jyvaskyla, Finland

      → Only accept events occurring completely within HPGe detector volume....


Experimental setup cont

• Experimental Setup (cont.)

  • Repeat for various HV Bias Voltages

    (4500V, 4000V, 3000V, 2000V, 1500V, 1000V, 750V, 500V, 250V, 100V, 50V)

Core Energy at Varying Bias Voltage


  • Login