An Overview of the Law on Spam Anti-Spam Research Group San Francisco, CA March 20, 2003 Jon Praed Internet Law Group

1. An Overview of the Law on Spam Anti-Spam Research Group San Francisco, CA March 20, 2003 Jon Praed Internet Law Group JonPraed@aol.com

2. Spam is Unsolicited Bulk Commercial Electronic Messages • Electronic messages – anticipate convergence • Commercial – not inherently illegal • Bulk – substantially similar messages • Unsolicited – intent of recipient is key

3. Spam Fighting Tools • Shield -- Internet Architecture & Filters • Sword -- Legal Enforcement

4. To Evade Filters, Spam = Fraud • Source and hypertext links are anonymous, transient or falsified • Free email accounts; anonymous credit cards; mail relays; obfuscated URLs; encrypted source code; DNS servers turned on/off; false domain name registrations (ICANN 9/02 action Verisign) • Third Party Conspirators Provide Cover • Spam Houses make $10,000/month to host webpages and hide identities of spammers (“I terminated him and deleted his info”) • Affiliate Program Operators – in search of plausible deniability

5. Law’s Purposes • General & Specific Deterrence • Compensation of Victims • Retribution • Education

6. Legal Weapons • Injunctions • Money Judgments • non-dischargeable in bankruptcy • disgorge profits from spammers • fund anti-spam fight • Imprisonment

7. A Hierarchy of Anti-Spam Rules • AUPs – setting expectations to protect private property • Common Law – trespass to chattels recognized in all 50 states • State Statutes – 34 states and counting (www.spamlaws.com) • codifying trespass with statutory damages • labeling requirements • outlawing fraudulent spam or requiring respect for do not email lists • Federal Statutes – • Computer Fraud & Abuse Act, 18 USC 1030 • Analogs: 47 USC 227 (unsolicited fax law); 18 USC 2257 (Adult Model Statute) • Pending Legislation (www.thomas.loc.gov) • Burns-Wyden CAN SPAM Act, SB 630 & others • International Law – none? • How will this affect the impact of anticipated Federal fixes?

8. Goals of Federal Proposals • Discourage use of fraud • Encourage transparency in identity • Ban spam, regardless of fraud • Regulate spam through labeling • Minimize impact on solicited marketers

9. A “Sunshine” Proposal for Federal Legislation • Modeled after Custodian of Records Law requiring Proof of Age of Adult-Movie Performers (18 USC 2257) • All commercial email (including solicited) must disclose a “custodian of records” (US resident, address, phone, email) • Failure to disclose = presumption of spam and high civil penalties (dollars per email) • False disclosures = criminal penalties • Disclosures subject to reasonable due diligence • Truthful disclosures, but inadequate records = reduced statutory damages (fraction of penny per email)

10. What the Law Needs From Internet Architecture • IDENTITY • accurate records reflecting status of Internet structure (domain names, IP addresses) • details of email transaction • intelligent record preservation • GEOGRAPHY • provides notice to spammers of applicable laws • empowers Netizens to avoid lawless-parts of the Internet

11. Limits of the Law • Dependence on technical information for identification • Slow and Costly • Legal Jurisdictions are Geographic-Based

12. Why We Will Defeat Spam • Victory Doesn’t Require 100% Spam-Free • Banks survive bank robberies • Spammers Struggle on Small Margins • Email is Incredibly Resilient • Email thrives despite 40% spam rate • Spam is the Parasite, Email is the Host • If spam kills email, spam dies too • Filters + Lawsuits Work, and Spammers Know It

13. Questions? An Overview of the Law on Spam Anti-Spam Research Group San Francisco, CA March 20, 2003 Jon Praed Internet Law Group JonPraed@aol.com