Imaging of anal fistula l.jpg
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 87

Imaging of Anal Fistula PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 1297 Views
  • Updated On :
  • Presentation posted in: General

Imaging of Anal Fistula. Dr Sue Roach. Introduction.

Related searches for Imaging of Anal Fistula

Download Presentation

Imaging of Anal Fistula

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Imaging of Anal Fistula

Dr Sue Roach


Introduction

Pre-operative confirmation of fistula complexity has been shown to facilitate surgical planning of sphincter saving techniques[1] and to reduce the incidence of unidentified sepsis, which is the leading cause of fistula recurrence [2].


Imaging Objectives

  • Determine relationship of fistula to sphincter complex

  • Identify any secondary fistulous tracks


Imaging Modalities

  • Fistulography

  • Endoanal ultrasound

  • Magnetic resonance


Fistulography

  • Acute tracks may not have a patent lumen

  • Difficult to relate the track to the sphincter and levator ani

  • Shown to be accurate in only 16% [3]

  • Helpful for chronic fistulae with an external opening distant from the anus


Endoanal ultrasound

  • Operator dependent

  • Highly accurate at identifying the internal opening [4]

  • Depicts fewer secondary extensions than MR

  • Difficulty differentiating active track from fibrosis


Magnetic Resonance

  • Most accurate technique for evaluation of the primary track and any extensions [4].

  • More accurate predictor of patient outcome than surgical findings at EUA[5].


Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL, Gerritsen van der Hoop A. et al. Preoperative MR Imaging of Anal Fistulas: Does it Really Help the Surgeon? Radiology 2001; 218:75-84

  • Prospective study 56 patients

  • MR prior to surgery but result witheld from surgeon until end of surgery while patient still anaesthetised

  • Important additional information in 21%. Benefit greatest in crohns (40%), recurrent fistulas (24%), primary fistulas (8%)


Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D et al. Outcome After Surgery for Perianal Fistula: Predictive Value of MR Imaging. AJR 1998; 171:403-406

  • Prospective study 48 patients

  • MR and then surgical exploration blinded to MR

  • MR categorised 41% complex. Surgery 38%. Only agreed in 8 cases

  • 19 patients required further surgery. 13 of these considered complex on MR, 9 by surgery

  • MR better at predicting outcome than surgery


Gadolinium?

  • Post operative problems

  • Complex cases such as crohns disease[6]


Endoanal coil?

  • Endocoils give superior anatomical resolution of fistula disease within the sphincter

  • Resolution falls off rapidly outside the sphincter

  • Complex tracks outside the sphincter are not well seen


MR Technique

  • Phased array pelvic coil

  • Axial and coronal imaging of the perineum

  • T1 and short T1 inversion recovery (STIR) images obtained

  • Additional saggital high resolution T2 images occasionally helpful

  • IV gadolinium rarely administered


Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose S. MR Imaging Classification of Perianal Fistulas and Its implications for Patient Management. Radiographics 2000; 20:623-635


Grade 1 Simple Intersphincteric Fistula


Grade 2 Intersphincteric track with secondary track or abscess


Grade 3 Trans-sphincteric Fistula


Grade 4 Trans-sphincteric Fistula With Abscess or Secondary Track


Grade 5 Supralevator and Translevator Disease


Aims

  • To establish the common MR patterns of idiopathic peri-anal fistulation in Hope Hospital patients.


Methods

  • Retrospective review

  • 24 consecutive MR scans performed for idiopathic anal fistulation

  • Scans performed on a 1 Tesla MR scanner with phased array pelvic coil technique


Results

% of patients


Discussion

  • Majority (50%) of patients with idiopathic peri-anal fistulation have uncomplicated disease

  • 25% have trans-sphincteric fistulae complicated by secondary tracks or ischiorectal abscess

  • Supra-levator or trans-levator disease is relatively rare in this patient group (8%).


Grade 1- Intersphincteric fistula


Grade 2- Intersphincteric fistula with collection


Grade 3- Trans-sphincteric fistula


Grade 4- Trans-sphincteric fistula with secondary track


Grade 5- Translevator disease


Summary

  • MR is a valuable modality in the assessment of peri-anal fistula

  • Accurately identifies disease complexity


References

  • 1: Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL, Gerritsen van der Hoop A. et al. Preoperative MR Imaging of Anal Fistulas: Does it Really Help the Surgeon? Radiology 2001; 218:75-84

  • 2: Bartram C, Buchanan G. Imaging anal fistula. Radiol Clin N Am 41 (2003) 443-457

  • 3: Kuijpers HC, Schulpern T. Fistulography for fistula-in-ano: is it useful? Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:103-4

  • 4: Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CI et al. Clinical Examination, Endosonography, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Fistula in Ano: Comparison with Outcome-based Reference Standard. Radiology 2004; 233:674-681

  • 5: Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D et al. Outcome After Surgery for Perianal Fistula: Predictive Value of MR Imaging. AJR 1998; 171:403-406

  • 6: Horsthius K, Stoker J. MRI of perianal crohn’s disease. AJR 2004; 183:1309-1315

  • 7: Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose S. MR Imaging Classification of Perianal Fistulas and Its implications for Patient Management. Radiographics 2000; 20:623-635


  • Login