1 / 18

Performance Assessment of 100% Recycled Hot Mix Asphalt

Performance Assessment of 100% Recycled Hot Mix Asphalt. Dr. J. Richard Willis National Center for Asphalt Technology. Background. Strategic Highway Research Program (SuperPave) mix design Level 1 – Purely volumetric Level 2 – Volumetrics and some performance testing

cbyrne
Download Presentation

Performance Assessment of 100% Recycled Hot Mix Asphalt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Performance Assessment of 100% Recycled Hot Mix Asphalt Dr. J. Richard Willis National Center for Asphalt Technology

  2. Background • Strategic Highway Research Program (SuperPave) mix design • Level 1 – Purely volumetric • Level 2 – Volumetrics and some performance testing • Level 3 – Mixes are optimized for performance while maintaining volumetric criteria

  3. Background • Most agencies use Level 1 or basic Level 2 • Transition to Level 3 and performance tests to • Assure long term performance • Enable higher recycled contents • Design high performing materials • Volumetrics aren’t enough

  4. 100% Recycled HMA • 100% of fine and coarse aggregate from RAP • 90% of asphalt binder from RAP • 10% of binder from recycling agent (RA) • Softens and rejuvenates aged RAP binder • Low viscosity oil • Requires new understanding of mix design within SuperPave system

  5. Objective • Summarize performance tests conducted on 100% RAP mixtures • Produced by Green Asphalt, LLC • New York City • 2011 – 2014 • Compare to established acceptance criteria • Evaluate suitability of 100% RAP mixtures for mainline projects

  6. Binder Grade • SuperPave performance graded binders • Ensure binder is not too stiff at low and intermediate temperatures • – premature cracking • Ensure binder is not too soft at high temperatures • – rutting susceptibility • RAP binders are stiffer due to aging • Oxidation and loss of oils • Rutting is not concern with conventional mixes

  7. 100% RAP HMA Extracted Binder Grade • Two mixtures evaluated • Testing at NCAT • Binder extracted (centrifuge) and recovered (Roto-VAP) • Binder tested – AASHTO M320

  8. 100% RAP HMA Binder Grade • RA improved performance of 100% RAP mixtures at all temperatures • Binder stiffness at intermediate temperature • critical to mixture cracking resistance

  9. Low Temperature Performance • Low temperature properties critical in northern climates • Binder properties alone not enough to determine mixture resistance to low temperature cracking • AASHTO T322 to assess strength and flexibility of mix at low temperatures

  10. Low Temperature Performance • 100% RAP mix placed on 26th Street in New York City • AASHTO T322 to determine critical low temperature • Critical NYC temp: -22°C • Extracted binder: -21°C • Mixture: -29.44°C

  11. Reflective Cracking Performance • Overlays are common maintenance technique • Reflective cracking is common distress • Previous cracks moving through new pavement • Overlay tester • Assess reflective cracking resistance of asphalt over concrete

  12. Reflective Cracking Resistance • Repeated loading at a singular temperature one strain level • 0.025 inches • 25°C • Analysis: Crack propagation • Output: Cycles to failure, Nf

  13. Rutting Performance • Rutting is a mixture stability problem • Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test is gaining popularity in assessing rutting resistance • AASHTO T324 • Temperature: 50°C • Influenced by intermediate stiffness

  14. Moisture Susceptibiity • AASHTO T283 • Tensile strength ratio calculated on cores, field mix, and lab mix • Ratio of conditioned to unconditioned mix was greater than 0.99 for all mixtures

  15. Summary • 100% RAP mixtures were able to either outperform and/or pass standard requirements for • Low temperature binder performance • Low temperature mixture performance • Reflective cracking • Rutting • And moisture susceptibility

  16. Recommendations • Choose recycling agent dose to balance cracking resistance with rutting susceptibility • Conduct field trials and evaluate actual pavement performance • Develop test program that ensures all mixes will perform satisfactorily without limiting recycled content in standard specifications

More Related