1 / 6

4 & 5 June 2008- Sydney

General Medicine Alcohol Admission Pathway Presenter: James MacWatt Hospital: Antares Contacts: Mary Bronson (08) 9346 3717 Page 4818 mary. bronson@health.wa.gov.au Bronwyn Cairns (08) 9346 1186 Page 4866 bronwyn.cairns@health.wa.gov.au. 4 & 5 June 2008- Sydney. Problems.

Download Presentation

4 & 5 June 2008- Sydney

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. General Medicine Alcohol Admission PathwayPresenter: James MacWattHospital: AntaresContacts: Mary Bronson(08) 9346 3717 Page 4818mary.bronson@health.wa.gov.auBronwyn Cairns(08) 9346 1186Page 4866bronwyn.cairns@health.wa.gov.au 4 & 5 June 2008- Sydney

  2. Problems • ↑ LOS/Bed Occupancy in Gen Med at Antares • State-wide ↑ Av. yearly cost, presentations and admissions related to alcohol * • Process Issues • Triple handling (ED, AAU, Home-ward) • Duplication of assessment • Multiple bottle necks • Lack of care coordination • Lack of continuity of care • Inefficient team communication * Impact of Alcohol on the Population of Western Australia, January 2008

  3. Aims • Improve patient care • Empower patient • ↓ LOS • ↓ waste-time waiting, multiple assessment • Right patient cared for in right environment • Improved team communication • Improve effectiveness of work processes

  4. KEY CHANGES IMPLEMENTED • Improve bed management process- Pull vs. Push • Improve Continuity of Care • Criteria Led Discharge • Care Coordination • Improved Team Liaison • Empower Team

  5. EARLY OUTCOMES • Reduction of LOS for Patient group by 62% (3.5 days from 9.125 days) • Reduction in mean transfer time from ED to home ward by 70 % (26.81 hours from 88.375 hours) • Improved patient report of care

  6. PROJECT EVALUATION • Early successes though difficult to sustain! • PROBLEMS • Fall down in communication • Staff Turnover • Loss of focus/priority • THE FUTURE • Process adjustment to aid sustainability • Plan, educate and re-implement with new team • Clinical project lead

More Related