1 / 29

Ionospheric Sources of Storm-time RC and Plasmasheet Populations

Ionospheric Sources of Storm-time RC and Plasmasheet Populations. R. B. Sheldon The University of Alabama in Huntsville. The Ring Current Origin. 30’s/50’s Chapman-Ferraro / Alfven view from SW 60’s Radiation Belt “diffusion” 70’s Explorer 45, Hoffman “Nose events”

carsten
Download Presentation

Ionospheric Sources of Storm-time RC and Plasmasheet Populations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ionospheric Sources of Storm-time RC and Plasmasheet Populations R. B. Sheldon The University of Alabama in Huntsville

  2. The Ring Current Origin • 30’s/50’s Chapman-Ferraro / Alfven view from SW • 60’s Radiation Belt “diffusion” • 70’s Explorer 45, Hoffman “Nose events” • Increased Convection E-field, brings plasmasheet ions deep into the magnetosphere. The “notch filter” permits only certain energy/PA’s deepest access. Partial RC forms. Then cross-L transport circularizes the RC • 80’s Spjeldvik, Sheldon, Kozyra, Fok, Jordanova, Chen... • 90’s POLAR/IMAGE ENA satisfying confirmation

  3. So where’s the beef? • Dessler-Parker-Sckopke doesn’t work like it should. • despite ENA’s and Dst tracking each other well • Great storms have 2 time-constant Dst recovery • Models often have an unexplained 2X factor around main phase (Fok, Jordanova, Chen) • RC densities can surpass plasmasheet densities in violation of Liouville’s theorem • Average Energy drops during a big storm injection • Composition Experiments don’t show plasmasheet

  4. Ionosphere Contribution to RC • Before composition experiments we didn’t know • O+,He+ are Iono, He++, C5+,O6+ are SW/Magneto • (1972) Shelley, Sharp: O+ exists in RC (E<30keV) • AMPTE (1984) Gloeckler: 50% Iono in RC (1<keV<300) • AMPTE (1986) Hamilton: O+ dominates • CRRES/MICS (1989) Grande: O+/H+ a Dst • Somehow the ionosphere is getting involved in a really major way. But how? (Joe vs. Robert) • cleft ion fountain/auroral upflow not making RC energies • plasmasphere just doesn’t have enough O+ to do it either

  5. Some theories • Plasmasphere drains into LLBL, flows over pole and makes a superdense plasmasheet, perfect for RC • it takes a few days. Storms take < 1 hour from SSC. • Storm heats atmosphere in auroral zone, sending upflows of O+ into plasmasheet that convect to RC • Daglis shows that RC O+ is very prompt, < 20 minutes • Sheldon showed that O+ & He+ are nearly simultaneous • Substorms preferentially heat O+ • Some storms have no substorms • The O+ dominance is at lower energy than usual

  6. POLAR/CAMMICE Timing Study • Cross-correlations

  7. Rosetta Stone, POLAR/CEPPAD April 15, 1996 (Sheldon GRL 98)

  8. 3 Populations • The Ring Current is well understood. Radial transport adiabatically heats the particles • The 100 keV ions are probably “nose” ions • pancake distribution, predominately H+, “monoenergetic”, NOT adiabatically heated • What is the lowest trace!!!??? • field-aligned, 40 keV, enriched in O+ • Energy stays nearly constant at 1/2 of “nose” ions! • (Also seen March 21, 96; preferentially at equinox?)

  9. It’s the Ionosphere, Stupid • What would have accelerated it to 40 keV? • Why is it strongly field-aligned? • Why does the energy track at 1/2 of nose ions? • How can it last from L=7 down to L=3? • Minimal Theory: • Nose ions generate field-aligned potential at 1/2 of their total kinetic energy which extract the ions from deep within the ionosphere. • Space Charge

  10. Review the Physics • Injection of hot plasma into the dipolar magnetosphere produces separation of charge • When cold M’sph plasma is outnumbered, space charge results. Consider the ions. • Space charge expands the ions, mirror force compresses the ions • m DB = q DF ; D2F = 4pr • so if Ba 1/r3, then r a 1/r5

  11. Some simple consequences • The potential looks like the magnetic field • The electric field looks like derivative B • The density of ions looks like 2nd deriv B • Suppose field line is radial near the Earth

  12. Double Spikes mirror pt mirror pt n,F S Iono Iono Equator

  13. Double Layers & High Potential • The separation of charge leads to voltages proportional to the energy of the ions. • Ionospheric electrons would neutralize the ions, but for gradient B drifts. • Energy is conserved, but this geometry acts as a transformer, producing parallel fields • It should work wherever gradient B drifts are large enough (and gyroradii small)

  14. Can a Magnet act as a Capacitor? • Standard Plasma books rarely do the dipole • Krall-Trivelpiece (1986) deal only with homogeneous magnetic fields. • MHD is not valid wherever grad-B drifts are important, e.g., inhomogeneous fields, hot plasma • “Malmberg trap” for non-neutral plasmas • Used to trap positrons, making anti-hydrogen • A dipole B-field w/ ionosphere “looks like” Malmberg • So is there any evidence for space charge in a dipole magnetic field?

  15. The UAH Spinning Terrella Bell jar High Voltage Low cost Laboratory Space Plasma Simple Physics Sylvania Detectors 1 T Fe-B-Nd magnet Mechanical feedthrough Cryopump

  16. 2K 3k 4k

  17. Ion injection at 800 V

  18. B/W, lower resolution

  19. Higher Pressure He

  20. 100 mTorr Helium

  21. 400 mTorr Helium

  22. 200 mTorr Helium, stationary

  23. 200 mTorr Helium, spinning

  24. Conclusions • Space charge can accumulate in a magnetic dipole field, and discharges when it overcomes the “insulator”. This produces a periodic “relaxation” oscillator or discharge. • These discharges are at some fixed fraction of the injection energy. Simple theory (Whipple 77) argue for E|| component of Etotal or pitchangle of injection • At Earth, the “RC-time constant” is dynamic, depending on (injection rate - neutralization rate) • ria ECON * nplasma • rna ne & niono & 1/L

  25. More Conclusions • Optimal Place for this discharge • Low magnetospheric electron density - Plasmasphere trough • Low ionospheric conductivity- trough at night • Equinoxes! (Check out the Russel-McPherron effect) • High plasmasheet ion density - pre-midnight • Optimal Time for this discharge • High convection Electric field - storm injection • High plasmasheet density - “primed” superdense PS • After plasmasphere is removed (double-dip?)

  26. Predictions • We should see keV precipitating electrons in a highly localized region just before main phase of a geomagnetic storm: • PIXIE? (Schulz 98) • We should see 2-beam instability generated waves • Pc1 with gyrofrequency dropping to O+ at dusk (Mursula 98) • We should see correlation between L-shell & O+ • Correlation between recovery rate and size

  27. Astrophysical Jets

More Related