150 likes | 403 Views
Definition of Competency to Stand Trial. Dusky v. U.S. (1959) defendant must have:
E N D
1. Current Trends in the Assessment of Competency to Stand Trial at State Inpatient FacilitiesAuthors: Crystal Mueller, Reneau Kennedy, Mio Taga Presented by: Reneau Kennedy
Hawaii Adult Mental Health Division
Forensic Mental Health Services Chief
Honolulu, HI
rckenned@amhd.health.state.hi.us
2. Definition of Competency to Stand Trial Dusky v. U.S. (1959) defendant must have:
“sufficient present ability to consult with his attorney with a reasonable degree of rational understanding,” and
“a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings”
3. Assessment of CST An estimated 60,000 competency evaluations are completed each year (Bonnie & Grisso, 2000)
How are these evaluations performed?
4. Methods of Assessment of CST Clinical judgment (interviews)
Traditional Psychological Assessment Instruments (IQ and personality tests)
Competency Specific Instruments
(CAI, CST, FIT, IFI, GCCT, MacCAT-CA)
5. Goals of Study To determine what methods were most frequently used to assess CST at state inpatient facilities
To determine the method for assessment of CST
6. Participants State Inpatient hospitals were identified from NASMHPD website, Sept. 03
Research assistants phoned facilities to identify if they were adult facilities that work with CST clients
Survey sent to 151 state inpatient facilities
A copy of survey also sent to NASMHPD forensic contact in each state
7. Participants After two mailings, 104 of 151 facilities responded
22 facilities did not work with CST consumers
82 facilities had CST consumers (43 states & DC)
Results based on 72 facilities that assessed CST (39 states & DC)
8. “Mark all instruments used to assess CST” CAI
GCCT
IFI
MacCAT-CA
CST
CADCOMP
MMPI
IQ
Clinical Interview (standardized)
Clinical Interview (non-standardized)
Other. Please list ____________________
9. Results Facilities selected approximately 4 items
Responses were analyzed based on 3 methods: clinical interview, traditional assessment tools, & competency specific instruments
10. Clinical Interview 67 facilities (93%) used clinical interview
54 used non-standardized interviews
32 used standardized interviews
19 facilities used both
11. Traditional Assessment Instruments 43 facilities (60%) used a Traditional Assessment Instrument
39 used IQ testing
35 used MMPI
12. Competency Specific Instruments 49 facilities (68%) used a competency specific instrument
38 used MacCAT-CA
17 used CAST-MR
11 used CAI
10 used CST
9 used GCCT
IFI & CADCOMP used at 1 facility each
13. Trends in Assessment 33 facilities (46%) used all three methods to assess CST
22 facilities (31%) used two of three methods to assess CST
16 facilities (22%) used one method (14 used interview alone)
1% could not be categorized
14. Study Weaknesses Based upon self-report of facilities & of individual completing questionnaire, may be based on estimates or best-guesses
Does not reveal frequency of assessment (at admission, once per month, etc.) or if methods varies based on initial or re-evaluation
Do not know training or expertise of individuals assessing CST at inpatient facilities
15. Works in Progress Fitness restoration at 77 inpatient facilities
List of Manualized Fitness Restoration materials
Detection of malingering at inpatient facilities
16. DISCUSSION