1 / 14

CAMELOT

CAMELOT. C oordination A nalysis M otivation E xecution Lo gistics T racking. Why CAMELOT?. Most of the System TOC is not Considered During a Source Selection TOC is Driven by Early-on Design & Logistics Decisions

carrie
Download Presentation

CAMELOT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAMELOT Coordination Analysis Motivation Execution Logistics Tracking

  2. Why CAMELOT? • Most of the System TOC is not Considered During a Source Selection • TOC is Driven by Early-on Design & Logistics Decisions • Necessary Information to Make Best Value TOC Decisions is not Normally Obtained • TOC must be Managed to be Reduced

  3. Coordination • Transition the Requirements & Key Performance Parameters from the Customer/User Representatives • Discuss TOC or Ao Modeling with Industry • Internally Discuss Contract Requirements & Government Controlled Inputs to Properly Evaluate TOC or Ao

  4. COORDINATION TOOLS COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY PAGES DRAFT RFP APBI ASOAR SOO ICT/IPT

  5. Analysis • Utilization of the Right Analytical Tools Throughout the Acquisition Process • Contractors & Government will be Utilizing the Same Tools to Optimize to Availability or Determine the TOC Impact of Proposed Actions PROPOSE IMPROVE MEASURE

  6. D D CAMELOT Analysis ProcessTOC Modeling Portion Contractor Inputs Proposed Negotiated Improved Actual Revised Baseline Evaluated Baseline Proposed Realized Expected Expected Actual Expected Government Inputs Proposed Savings Realized Savings/Costs

  7. ANALYTICAL TOOLS ACE-IT SESAME COMPASS CWARM LCET SW COST MODELS QUANTITY DISCOUNT EOQ TAILORED EXCEL SPREADSHEETS

  8. Motivation • Contractor’s TOC Evaluated in Source Selection to Stimulate TOC Competition • TOC Management Techniques Proposed & Evaluated in Source Selection • Establishing a Shared Data Environment • Managing TOC Reduction • Contractors Share in the Benefits Associated with their TOC Reduction Efforts by Incentives

  9. MOTIVATION TOOLS PERFORMANCE INCENTIVES SHARED SAVINGS COMPETITION AWARD FEES TOC IN SOURCE SELECTION VALUE ENGINEERING PROGRAM

  10. Execution • TOC Baseline Factors are Determined Through Negotiations Prior to Award • Verification Procedures are Developed with Industry • Remedies to the Government are Clear & Corrective in Nature • Contractor Performance Fed into Performance History Database for Future PRAG

  11. EXECUTION TOOLS FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS LONG TERM WARRANTIES CONTRACT BASELINES PRAG INPUT TOC REDUCTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

  12. LOgisticsTracking • Contractor Maintains Data in Their Own Format Covering All TOC Factors Within Their Control & Responsibility • Update of TOC Estimates Based on Field Returns or Proposed Improvements • Shared Data Environment Between Government & Contractor

  13. LOGISTICS TRACKINGTOOLS CONTRACTOR MGMT INFO PRACTICES SHARED DATA ENVIRONMENT GOVERNMENT DATABASES VIRTUAL TRACKING SYSTEM LOGS FRACAS

  14. CAMELOT Changes to Current Acquisition Practices • Analyze System Reliability and Availability Requirements within Government • Use Govt Ao Driven LCC Models for Best Value Decisions & Encourage Industry to Use Them • Use TOC or Ao as an Evaluation Factor in Source Selection • Provide Incentives to Industry for TOC Reduction • Hold Industry Accountable for Delivering What It Promises • Establish a Shared Data Environment

More Related