The 1850s
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 34

The 1850s PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 69 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The 1850s. United States in 1850. Free states. 36’30 ”. Slave states. What Caused the Civil War?. Slavery a growing moral issue in the North while it expanded in the South Constitutional dispute over Federal powers vs. States’ rights

Download Presentation

The 1850s

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The 1850s

The 1850s


United states in 1850

United States in 1850

Free states

36’30”

Slave states


What caused the civil war

What Caused the Civil War?

  • Slavery a growing moral issue in the North while it expanded in the South

  • Constitutional dispute over Federal powers vs. States’ rights

  • Economic differences between industrial North and agricultural South (tariffs, banking, internal improvements, expansion)

  • Political errors and extremism on both sides


Wilmot proviso 1846

Wilmot Proviso 1846

  • Mexican War (Mexican cession) gains upset the pre-1846 balance:

    • 15 free and 15 slave states for Senate

    • South held 38% seats in House (1850)

  • W.P. proposed during the war: no slavery in areas gained from Mexico (not Texas)

  • Supported by Free-Soilers, Northern Dems, and Northern Whigs (who also wanted all slaves and freemen excluded)

  • Passed House, defeated in pro-slave Senate


Slavery restricted under wilmot proviso 1846

Slavery restricted under Wilmot Proviso 1846

Slavery

prohibited

36’ 30”


Wilmot proviso debate 1846

Wilmot Proviso debate 1846

  • Many Americans assumed Congress had power to legislate slavery in territories, (loose constructionist) as it had with NW Ordinance and Missouri Compromise in Louisiana Territory 1820

  • Debate develops two new arguments:

    • Congress had moral duty to prohibit slavery where its power extended. Freedom national and slavery only sectional. Basis of Free Soil and Republican ideologies

    • Congress could not restrict slavery in territories, but was required to protect it there. Later backed by Supreme Court


Common property doctrine 1846 1847

Common Property Doctrine 1846-1847

  • John C. Calhoun

  • Most extreme Southern position

  • Congress under Constitution had no power to regulate slavery in territories prior to statehood (strict construction)

  • All citizens have equal rights to take property into areas owned jointly by all states. Territories owned by states united, not United States.

  • Slaves were common-law property, like cattle

  • Only deep South Whigs and Dems supported


Common property doctrine 2

Common Property Doctrine 2

  • Slavery ceased to be illegal in Mexican territory when lost by Mexico

  • Missouri Compromise unconstitutional

  • Slavery should follow the flag

  • Northerners feared that slavery would become untouchable

  • Dred Scott (1857) Supreme Court decision read the Constitution this way


Common property doctrine map 1847 pre oregon terr

Common Property Doctrine Map 1847 (pre-Oregon Terr.)

Territories open to slavery under Common Property Doctrine


Missouri compromise extension

Missouri Compromise extension

  • President Polk (1845-1849) supported

  • Would hold slavery to a northern border, but not western border

  • Slave states could enter from Mexican cession

  • Polk and Northern Dems favored, might keep free-soil Dems in the party


Extend missouri compromise into mexican cession

Extend Missouri Compromise into Mexican cession

Free

36’ 30”

Slave


The 1850s

1850

36’ 30”


Popular sovereignty

Popular Sovereignty

  • 1848 Cass (Dem) party platform

  • Let the settlers in a territory vote to decide

  • Congress and President not decision-makers


Cass popular sovereignty 1848 oregon organized free 1848

Cass’ Popular Sovereignty 1848(Oregon organized free 1848)

Open to slavery under Pop Sov


Popular sovereignty doctrine 2

Popular Sovereignty Doctrine (2)

Territories closed to slavery under Pop Sov


Issues with pop sov and common property

Issues with Pop Sov and Common Property

  • Not clear when slavery is prohibited or allowed

  • Did not say if or how much a territory could regulate slavery

  • Territories could only decide when they are about to apply for statehood (Common Property)

  • Seems that slavery would have time to become established in new territories (pro-South)

  • No, territories could exclude slavery (pro-North)

  • Acceptable middle path since it avoided an immediate decision on the whole issue


Popular sovereignty 1850

Popular Sovereignty 1850

Areas still open to slavery

applying 1850 Pop Sov

Territories open to slavery under

Pop Sov


Election of 1848

Election of 1848

  • Cass (D) Pop Sov

  • Taylor (W) Mexican War fame, took no position on slavery in election

  • Martin van Buren (Free Soil)

    • Anti-slavery Whigs and anti-slavery Dems

    • Not offered Dem nomination


Election results of 1848

Election Results of 1848


Crisis of 1849 1850

Crisis of 1849-1850

  • Gold and land in California attract 100,000 settlers

  • California has military governor, settlers select to skip from unorganized territory to statehood

  • Sept 1849 constitutional convention called, drafted anti-slavery constitution

  • Constitution approved 12,000 to 800

  • Elections held for legislature and governor

  • Fully functioning as a state ready for 1850

  • California applies for statehood as free 1849


California statehood

California statehood

  • Split

    • Southern “fire-eaters” meet in Nashville in December 1849-1850 to discuss secession

    • Clay’s submits Compromise of 1850


States convention

States Convention

  • December 1849-1850 Nashville (States Rights) to discuss secession

  • Same time as Congress (December 1850)

  • Response to California application

  • Similar to Hartford Convention of 1814

  • Radical Southerners attended from nine states

  • But passed only mild resolutions in the end


Why was the south worried

Why was the South worried?

  • Southern President

  • Southern majority on President’s cabinet

  • Southern majority on the Supreme Court

  • Equality in the Senate

  • Lowered tariff under Polk 1846

  • 1801-1848 slavery extended to Louisiana, Florida, Texas, and Indian Territory (Oklahoma)


The compromise of 1850

The Compromise of 1850

  • California enters as free state

  • Mexican cession divided into Utah and New Mexico territories and settlers use Pop Sov

  • Land between Texas and New Mexico goes to New Mexico and US assumes Texas debt

  • Ban slave trade in D.C., but not slavery

  • New Fugitive Slave Law with stronger enforcement


The 1850s

1850

  • Webster, Calhoun, and Clay gave their final great speeches in this debate

    • Clay for compromise

    • Webster for compromise

    • Calhoun against

  • Taylor blocked Compromise, but died in 1850

  • Succeeded by Vice-President Millard Fillmore, who supported Compromise

  • Senator Stephen A. Douglas created necessary coalitions to pass, easing tensions 1850-1854


Compromise of 1850

Compromise of 1850


Election of 1852

Election of 1852


Franklin pierce 1853 1857

Franklin Pierce (1853-1857)


Polk pierce and expansion

Polk, Pierce, and expansion


Kansas nebraska act 1854

Kansas-Nebraska Act 1854


Bleeding kansas

Bleeding Kansas


James buchanan 1857 1861

James Buchanan (1857-1861)


Abraham lincoln 1861 1865

Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865)


Bibliography

Bibliography

  • file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Faculty1/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/4F0EQQ10/ppt14%5B1%5D.ppt#256,2,Map 14.1: The Compromise of 1850

  • Newman, John M. and John M. Schmalbach. United States History: Preparing for the Advanced Placement examination. Amsco

  • http://teachpol.tcnj.edu/amer_pol_hist/fi/000000aa.htm


  • Login