1 / 11

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. EPAct of 2005 Effect on Review of LNG Facilities & Working with FERC CSO Annual meeting October 18, 2005. Authorities Given to FERC. Regulations issued October 7, 2005 Requires applicant to use PRE-FILING Exclusive siting authority.

Download Presentation

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission EPAct of 2005 Effect on Review of LNG Facilities & Working with FERC CSO Annual meeting October 18, 2005

  2. Authorities Given to FERC • Regulations issued October 7, 2005 • Requires applicant to use PRE-FILING • Exclusive siting authority

  3. Authorities Given to FERC(cont’d) • Lead agency • Setting schedule for Federal authorizations • Agencies shall comply with the schedule

  4. Authorities Given to FERC(cont’d) • FERC maintains a consolidated record • Agencies must help create this record • Record is for appeals of CZMA or judicial review of agency actions

  5. FERC Coordination with States • Governor appoints an agency to consult • FERC must consult with this agency • State agency files a safety advisory report

  6. FERC Coordination with States (cont’d) • FERC response to the safety advisory report • Emergency Response Plan

  7. FERC Coordination with States (cont’d) • State safety inspections of LNG facilities • State may notify FERC of safety violations • FERC notifies the state of its actions

  8. FERC Coordination with Dept. of Defense • FERC/DOD MOU on LNG facilities which may affect an active military installation • Concurrence of DOD required

  9. Importance of Cooperating Agency Relationship • State CZM Agencies should accept invitations to be cooperating agencies • Help construct the single federal record • Provide review and comment on advanced draft documents • Open communication throughout the review process

  10. Maintaining Options • Cooperating status does not limit State’s ability to develop conclusions different from FERCs • Basis of any disagreements may be addressed in the EIS

  11. Proactive vs. Reactive • Input and feedback is continual rather than episodic • Flexible relationship – expectations tailored to meet agencies capabilities • No surprises

More Related