1 / 61

# Numerical Methods in Electrical Engineering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Numerical Methods in Electrical Engineering. Professor David Thiel Centre for Wireless Monitoring and Applications Griffith University, Brisbane Australia. Purpose. This is a follow-on workshop from the Optimization workshop. The aim is to introduce two methods of electromagnetic modelling:

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Numerical Methods in Electrical Engineering' - carly-atkins

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Numerical Methods in Electrical Engineering

Professor David Thiel

Centre for Wireless Monitoring and Applications

Griffith University, Brisbane Australia

• This is a follow-on workshop from the Optimization workshop.

• The aim is to introduce two methods of electromagnetic modelling:

• The Method of Moments (MoM): frequency domain, open boundaries.

• The Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD): time domain, closed boundaries.

• To outline the validation processes essential to obtaining reliable solutions.

• I wished to solve some fundamental problems in electromagnetic geophysics where subsurface targets were small and the earth was both highly conductive and semi-infinite.

• I have worked with many numerical EM techniques including

• MoM

• FDTD

• Impedance method

• FEM

• FDM

• Spice (Circuit simulator)

• Overview of Numerical Modelling for electromagnetics.

• The Method of Moments.

• The Finite-Difference Time-domain method.

• Review.

Overview of the Modelling Process

• To reduce the number of prototypes constructed.

• To use as the forward solver in an optimization routine to gain the best possible design.

• Design and build lots of physical models

• Time consuming

• Expensive

• Measurement difficulties (cables, calibration, mechanical precision, interference, mutual coupling, field confinement, etc)

• Analytical solutions

• Limited to simple models because of the computational complexity

• You MUST make a physical model!

• You MUST undertake some simple theoretical modelling for use in your numerical modelling analysis!

• If you don’t, you have no verification of your model and the results are not acceptable for publication!

• This is true EVEN if you use “proven” commercial software.

• Select/write your numerical modelling code.

• Find a simple analytical model and divide into segments/pixels/voxels.

• These MUST have every dimension less than l/10 where l is the wavelength in the material being modelled. (Note that this is NOT the free space wavelength).

• The complex propagation coefficient g is given by the equation

where

• s is the conductivity,

• e is the absolute permittivity,

• m is the absolute magnetic permeability,

• w is the angular radiation frequency, and j is the imaginary number,

• a is the attenuation constant

• b is the phase constant

• At this frequency we have

• The wavelength depths on the electromagnetic properties of the material.

• Remember NO segment/pixel/voxel can be larger than in any dimension l/10.

• This can make life very difficult when you have electrically large conductive materials.

• MoM and FDTD both use perfectly conducting materials.

• To introduce finite conductivity, we can use lumped impedance elements.

• Enter the model

• Pre-processing: Divide the model into segments/pixels/voxels. You need to know the coordinates of very line and corner.

• Apply the solver

• Post-processing: Extract the important parameters (gain, front to back ratio, beam width, bandwidth, input impedance, radiation pattern, near-field strength etc)

• Select/write your numerical modelling code.

• Find a simple analytical model and divide into segments/pixels/voxels.

• Solve the simple model analytically and numerically.

• Alter the segments/pixels/voxel size and recalculate the numerical model.

• Recalculate use different sized segments/pixels/voxels.

• Do not use a factor of 2, 5 or 10.

• Why?

• To ensure that your modelling routine is robust

• To assess what accuracy is needed to get good results

• To minimize the number of segments/pixels/voxels in the model to reduce the computational time and the memory requirements.

• Enter your full model and check results.

• Alter the segments/pixels/voxel size and recalculate the numerical model.

• Only when you have robust answers can you conclude that the model is correct.

• It is often a good idea to re-enter the model to ensure conductor connectivity, no air gaps, etc.

• Look for one or more lines of symmetry and apply a boundary (perfect conductor or perfect magnetic conductor).

• One line of symmetry can halve the computational effort.

• For circular or cylindrical symmetry, you can change a 3D problem to a 2D or 1D problem.

The Method of Moments

• Numerical technique used to solve integral equations.

• The model common code is the Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC) developed at Lawrence Livermore Laboratories to check the effect of EMP on antennas.

• Originally created in the 1980’s, NEC2 is freely available.

• Now commercially available in more user-friendly form.

• The method is always in 3D.

• The model is constructed of infinitely thin, perfectly conducting wires.

• To construct a plane, you need a 2D intersecting grid of wires.

• To construct a volume, you need a 3D intersecting grid of wires.

• To add loss, each segment must contain a lumped impedance resistance.

• To account for finite radius, a perturbation technique is used in the code – BUT, the current on the wire is always axially symmetric.

• If this approximation is not good enough, you need to construct a cylindrical grid of wires to represent the conductor of finite diameter.

• You must add at least one source (voltage or current) to one of the conducting segments to provide energy to the system.

• NEC2 provides an option for calculations in free space or calculations in the vicinity of a ground plane (infinite extent but finite or infinite conductivity).

• The ground plane calculation is done using image theory and the Sommerfeld surface wave (if selected).

• The MoM computational engine places all conductive segments in a matrix and calculates the induced current in every segment using mutual coupling equations.

• The current on a single straight wire is fitted by a basis function which smooths the current transition between segments

• The near electric field, the near magnetic field and the electromagnetic far field (radiated field) is calculated using the standard Hertzian dipole formulation.

• Wire segments are too long then incorrect results (phase errors).

• Wire segments are too short then incorrect results (truncation errors).

• Wire segments are too close and not connected (axial symmetry is not a valid approximation).

• The feed point(s) is not on a conducting segment.

• The wires do not exactly meet. An air gap is a major problem.

• The code was designed for computer card entry.

• Each line contains one piece of information.

• Most codes have a user-friendly interface and the codes are created semi-automatically.

q

y

f

x

NEC Coordinate System

The xoy plane (z = 0) is where the ground plane is located if used.

• Comment Cards

• CM comments - can only be at the start of the program

• CE end comments - only one required.

• Structure Geometry Cards

• GA wire arc specification

• GE end geometry - 0 means no ground plane

• GF use numerical Green's function

• GM shift and duplicate structure

• GR generate cylindrical structure (symmetry)

• GS scale structure dimensions - 0, 0, 1

• GW specify wire - number, number of segments in wire, x1,y1,z1, x2, y2, z2, radius

• GX reflect structure

• SP specify surface patch

• GH generate helix

• Program control cards

• FR frequency specification - 0, # of steps, 0, 0, start f, Df

• GN ground parameter specification - 0 for free space, 1 for perfect gnd, 2 finite gnd

• LD structure impedance loading - 0 series RLC or 1 parallel RLC, wire #, start seg #, end seg #, R, L, C

• EX structure excitation - 0, wire #, segment #, 00, volts real, volts imag

• NT two-port network specification

• TL transmission line specification

• EN end of data flag

• GD additional ground parameter specification

• NE near electric field request

• NH near magnetic field request

• RP radiation pattern - 0, # of q steps, # of f steps, 1000, q start, f start, Dq, Df

NEC Coding example: Dipole antenna in free space

CM Simple dipole antenna in Free Space

CM Optimized for resonance at 300 MHz

CE

GW 1, 9, 0, -.2418, 0, 0, .2418, 0, .0001

GS 0, 0, 1

GE 0

EX 0, 1, 5, 0, 1, 0

FR 0, 1, 0, 0, 300, 1

RP 0, 181, 1, 1000, -90, 0, 1, 1

RP 0, 1, 360, 1000, 90, 0, 1, 1

EN

• http://www.smeter.net/antennas/mmana-tutorial.php

• This is based on Mininec – a preNEC program which is very efficient computationally.

• Iskander, M.F., 1992. Electromagnetic fields and waves, Prentice Hall. (Section 4.9)

• Harrington, R.F., 1993. Field computation by moment methods, IEEE Press.

• Guru, B.S., and Hiziroglu, H.R., 1998. Electromagnetic field theory and fundamentals. PWS Publishing Company. pp. 530-533.

• NEC manual. (on the web)

• Sadiku, N.O., 1992. Numerical Techniques in Electromagnetics, CRC Press. (Section 3.8, Chapter 5)

Finite-Difference Time-Domain

• Method was developed by Yee in 1966 to perform a direct solution of Maxwell’s equations.

• Using a Finite-difference scheme for Maxwell’s equations, the method calculates the magnetic and then the electric field components through space containing the objects(s) after each time step.

• By directly calculating electric and magnetic fields through space, the technique inherently includes all EM phenomena including:

• Surface waves

• Far field values (Radiated waves)

• Near field values

• Mutual coupling

• By recording the time dependent field strength at various places in the solution space, it is possible to calculate parameters such as:

• Input impedance

• Reflection coefficients

• Effective dielectric constant

• The system of equations can be solved in 1D (a line), 2D (a surface) and 3D.

• All electromagnetic systems including

• EM Couplers

• Antennas

• UWB systems

• Discontinuities in transmission lines (microstrip lines, waveguides, etc)

• electromagnetic geophysics

• etc

• The differential form of Maxwell’s equations are solved using the central difference formulation of the partial differential operator.

• If u is a field (H or E), then

TM case TE Case

TM case TE case

• The E and H fields are not calculated at exactly the same point so the time at which the calculations are performed must reflect this.

• ChoseE and H to be offset by Dx/2 and so the time spacing between theEand H calculations must be Dt/2. We must therefore write the equation as:

• E is calculated in the half spaces (i+1/2) and at integer time (n).

• H is calculated in the integer spaces (i) and at half times (n+1/2).

n+1

n+1/2

n

n-1/2

n-1

E field

H field

x

i-1 i-1/2 ii+1/2 i+1

Leap-frog stepping – update equations

• This is a time domain method so need a time domain source.

• Simple source is a Gaussian pulse

• The pulse is centred at time n0 and has a 1/e decay constant of ndecay time steps. The source field is given by:

n0 = 4ndecay

ndecay = 10

• This can be applied at any time and any E field place.

• An H field source can be used at an H field place.

• This is called a “hard source” as the field is fixed by the equation.

• Usually need to use a “soft source” which includes energy from other nodes.

• Ein is calculated from the update equations.

• The FDTD method is a closed method.

• It is essential to treat every boundary in some way.

• At PEC (perfect electric conductor) we have:

• In 1D we have E = 0 at the boundary.

• The FDTD method is a closed method.

• It is essential to treat every boundary in some way.

• At PMC (perfect magnetic conductor) we have:

• In 1D we have H = 0 at the boundary.

• This is quite difficult to manage when the angle of incidence is oblique.

• Mur’s ABC in 2D

• In 1D we have Ei+1/2n+1 = Ei-1/2n

• Berenger used a multilayered PML

• Time step increments must be sufficiently small to ensure a stable process.

• In 2D

• In 1D

• Run the program FDTD1D.m

• Read the program and identify the components.

• Change the two boundaries

• Change the material properties

• Record E(t) at one point in the solution space for the duration of the pulse (There must be energy loss in the system either through an ABC, PML or conductive material).

• E(w) the Fourier transform of E(t).

• Survey!

• Taflove, A., 1995. Computational Electrodynamics: the Finite-difference Time-domain Method, Norwood, MA: Artech House.

• Kunz, K.S., and R.J. Luebbers, 1993. The Finite Difference Time Domain Method for Electromagnetics, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

• Stutzman, W.L., & Thiele, G.A., 1998. Antenna theory and design, 2nd ed., Wiley (Chapter 11)

• Berenger, J.P., 1994. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J. Computational Physics, vol 114, pp. 185-200.

• Isaacson, E., & Keller, H.B., 1967. Analysis of numerical methods. Wiley, New York.

• Mur, G., 1981. Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference approximation of the time-domain electromagnetic field equations. IEEE Trans. Electromagnetic Compatability, vol. 23, pp. 377-382.

• Sadiku, M.N.O., 1992. Numerical techniques in electromagnetics, CRC Press, Boca Raton. Section 3.8.

• Thiel, D.V., & Mittra, R., 1997. Surface impedance modelling using the finite-difference time-domain method. IEEE Trans. Geoscience & Remote Sensing, vol 35, pp. 1350-1356.

• Yee, K.S., 1966. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media. IEEE Trans AP-14, pp 302-307.