1 / 28

Green Infrastructure in the Semi-Arid West

Peaks to Prairies Regional Pollution Prevention Center Webinar  June 18, 2014 Stacey Eriksen, EIT Urban Watershed Revitalization Coordinator Eriksen.Stacey@epa.gov 303-312-6692. Green Infrastructure in the Semi-Arid West. EPA Voluntary Programs . Urban Waters Partnership

carlo
Download Presentation

Green Infrastructure in the Semi-Arid West

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Peaks to Prairies Regional Pollution Prevention Center Webinar  June 18, 2014 Stacey Eriksen, EIT Urban Watershed Revitalization Coordinator Eriksen.Stacey@epa.gov 303-312-6692 Green Infrastructure in the Semi-Arid West

  2. EPA Voluntary Programs • Urban Waters Partnership • Partnership for Sustainable Communities • Green Infrastructure • Water Sense • Brownfields • Revitalization • Support for FEMA

  3. Improving the Approach to Stormwater Management • Traditional approach – convey stormwater quickly from site to water body or detention ponds • Approach is not adequately controlling water quality and quantity impacts from discharges from increased development: pollutant loading, stream erosion, increased runoff/reduced infiltration, changes to stream geomorphology and impacts to aquatic habitat • New approach - using Low Impact • Development/Green Infrastructure • View stormwater as a resource • Manage stormwater on-site • Reduce pollutant loads to water bodies

  4. Low Impact Development • A comprehensive land planning design approach for maintaining & enhancing the pre-development hydrologic regime. • Can sustain or restore a watershed's hydrologic and ecological functions. • A sustainable stormwater practice. • Can be applied to new development, redevelopment, or as retrofits to existing development. • A paradigm shift in site design.

  5. Green Infrastructure • Systems and practices that use or mimic natural processes to infiltrate, evapotranspirate or reuse stormwater or runoff on site. • Can be used at a wide range of landscape scales in place of, or in addition to, more traditional stormwater control elements. • Preservation and restoration of natural landscape features (forests, floodplains and wetlands) are critical components of GI-by protecting these ecologically sensitive areas, water quality will improve while providing wildlife habitat and outdoor recreation opportunities.

  6. Green Infrastructure Systems that mimic a natural hydrologic cycle to take stormwater and slow it down, spread it out, and soak it in. Can be integrated into: • Parks, open space, urban forestry • Parking lot landscaping requirements • Climate adaptation strategies • Smart growth/ sustainability/ resilience strategies • Flood restoration

  7. Types of Green Infrastructure • Green Roofs • Planter Boxes • Rain Gardens • Bioswales/Bioretention Cells • Vegetated Swales, Tree Trenches • Ponds • Porous Pavements • Green Streets/Complete Streets • Wetlands, Riparian areas • Rainwater Harvesting

  8. Value of Green Infrastructure • Stormwater management • Climate adaptation • Urban heat island reduction • Biodiversity • Air quality improvements • Clean water • Healthy soils • Recreation • Quality of life

  9. Additional Benefits • Reduced & delayed stormwater runoff volumes • Enhanced groundwater recharge • Stormwater pollutant reductions • Reduced sewer overflow events • Increased carbon sequestration • Additional wildlife habitat & recreational space • Improved human health • Increased land values • Less splash, spray, ponding, noise, and pollutants coming off permeable pavements • Can be less expensive than grey infrastructure, especially long term • More aesthetically pleasing • Makes communities more resilient

  10. Cost of Green vs Grey Infrastructure • Denver Housing Authority uses both rain gardens and pervious pavements in their Park Avenue development. DHA was able to decrease stormwater infrastructure costs from $850,000 (stormwater vault) to $350,000 (bioswales and permeable pavements). DHA estimates that they will save $3,000,000 at it’s Mariposa site by using LID/GI over traditional grey infrastructure • Communities will spend 2-3 times more in total to implement stormwater BMPs if each land owner goes it alone than if community pooled money and installed BMPs in optimal locations http://www.epa.gov/ne/topics/water/pdfs/OptimalSWMngtPlanAlternativesUpperCharlesPilotStudy.pdf • 12-20% cost savings- Chicago http://cgl-ltdmap.com/greenforum/?p=93 • Georgetown Riverview Restoration Project (Duwamish River, Seattle), Markey Manufacturing-Cost to connect to King County stormwater system was more than $1M. Cost of designing and building 3 swales was $95K. http://daily.sightline.org/daily_score/archive/2010/03/02/industrial-strength-stormwater-fix • Calculator http://greenvalues.cnt.org/ • Use a systems thinking approach to calculate the complete costs and benefits.

  11. GI in the Semi-Arid West • Denver 15” precipitation • 300 days of sunshine • Infrequent intense storms • Xeriscape-low water native plants • “Taupe Infrastructure”

  12. GI in the Semi-Arid West • No CSOs • Prior appropriation-someone else owns that water • Clay soils • Design and engineering for infiltration • Site specific design and installation

  13. Barriers to GI in the Semi-Arid West • Perceived design, construction & maintenance costs • Mixed messages & lack of connections from different governmental agencies & departments • Misperception on economics • Lack of integration into regional & site planning • Lack of trust in new technologies

  14. Funding Sources • Section 319 nonpoint source grants • Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund • Urban Waters Small Grants • Green infrastructure technical assistance • Revitalization funding • Brownfields area-wide planning grants • Brownfields job-training grants • Brownfields assessment, revolving loan fund, and cleanup grants • Greening America’s Capitals • Building Blocks Assistance

  15. Websites and Tools • Western examples (CO, UT, MT, WY, ND, SD): http://www2.epa.gov/region8/green-infrastructure • Barriers analysis in Boulder area: http://www.keepitcleanpartnership.org/ • UDFCD Volume 3 Criteria Manual http://udfcd.org/downloads/down_critmanual_volIII.htm • EPA National Green Infrastructure webpage http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/greeninfrastructure/index.cfm • New national stormwater calculator http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/wq/models/swc/ • Green infrastructure tools http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/greeninfrastructure/ • Colorado Stormwater Center http://stormwatercenter.colostate.edu/

  16. UWP Green Infrastructure Projects Using EPA Funding • DHA GI design charette • Westerly Creek GI design • ULC GI design for 38th & Blake • S. Platte Brownfields corridor planning • River North GI design • Sun Valley & Johnson/Habitat Park GI design • Dry Gulch GI Design

  17. Lessons Learned: DHA Stormwater/GI Charette • Look beyond project boundaries to ensure a comprehensive approach & solution • Identify all key stakeholders & stormwater plans before developing a regional solution • Identify priorities & tradeoffs between water quantity & water quality solutions • Define clear goals & metrics of success • Collaboration & prioritization among city players is crucial for the successful implementation of solutions • Innovative solutions may require research & testing • City policies may limit the implementation & effectiveness of some stormwater strategies

  18. Leveraging Resources and Partnerships: Green Infrastructure Technical Assistance Program

  19. Blake TOD: Located at the Intersection of two transit lines

  20. Blake TOD: Before

  21. A Broader Area Vision in Three Phases

  22. Analyzing the Site Designing to the Site

  23. ToolboxExamples

  24. Phase I Subcatchment Delineations and Runoff Volumes

  25. Phase I Green Infrastructure Practice Proposed Location and Sizing.

  26. O & M Considerations • Monitor infiltration and drainage • Pruning and mowing • Mulching and mulch removal • Watering and fertilization • Remove and replace dead plants • Inlet, outlet, and underdrain inspections • Miscellaneous upkeep • All at different frequencies

  27. Lessons Learned from ULC Design and Charette • Comprehensive gathering of local stakeholders leads to a better more implementable design. • Holistic approach with GI incorporated into the site design improved design & saves money. • Considering possible future phases led to a better design and made efficient use of resources. • Environmental conditions affect GI options. • Cost estimates make incorporating recommendations more likely.

  28. Reduce Runoff- Slow it Down, Spread it Out, Soak it in Thank You!

More Related