1 / 22

Martinez Unified School District CST DATA ANALYSIS 2011-12 STAR results

Martinez Unified School District CST DATA ANALYSIS 2011-12 STAR results. Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology. 10 September 2012. County & State Comparison. ELA Above county and state averages (all grade levels) Math Above state averages (all grade levels)

carla-wynn
Download Presentation

Martinez Unified School District CST DATA ANALYSIS 2011-12 STAR results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Martinez Unified School District CST DATA ANALYSIS2011-12 STAR results Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September 2012

  2. County & State Comparison • ELA • Above county and state averages (all grade levels) • Math • Above state averages (all grade levels) • Above county averages in all but 2nd & 6th • Secondary Math

  3. ELA: Percent Proficient Trends

  4. Math: Percent Proficient Trends

  5. History and Social Science • History (8th, Grade 11, US History) • Flat over the years at ~50% proficiency • Slight growth in 8thGrade History • Social Science (5th, 8th, 10th, Bio, Chem, ES) • Decline in Biology and Earth Science • Growth in 8th Grade Science

  6. API & AYP

  7. Comparison Because of a testing irregularity (not in MUSD) AYP and API will not be released until October

  8. ASAM: Vicente & Briones • Indicators • Credit recovery • Student Persistence • Math Achievement

  9. API: 4 Year Trends & Projections ** Projected API Scores are from Data Director and NOTofficial scores

  10. Las Juntas – PI Update • 2011 Testing Irregularity • Projected API could mean Year 2 PI Status is coming • Compliance Implications: • School Choice/Transportation • Set aside of Title I Funding for SES • Comprehensive Assessment + Plan for CDE

  11. CONTEXT: AYP Targets Over Time

  12. Numerically significant Subgroups

  13. Numerically Significant Subgroups • Hispanic or Latino • White • English Learners • Socioeconomically Disadvantaged • Two or More Races • Students with Disabilities

  14. Subgroup Comparison

  15. Comparison by Ethnicity: ELA Percent Proficient

  16. Comparison by Ethnicity: Math Percent Proficient

  17. Conclusions & next steps

  18. Identified for Further Analysis • 2nd & 5th Grade Math, ELA • CST Cluster Analysis – site specific • 6th Grade Math • MJHS has already put changes in place to address • Earth Science • Increase in percent proficient = bump for AHS • Subgroups: ELs, Hispanic/Latino, SED, SPED • Evaluate Programs (Imagine Learning, Read 180) • CST Cluster Analysis – site specific • Target Interventions

  19. Schools Over 800 are Different Standards mastery & coverage is not enough! College & Career Readiness, Common Core State Standards, Tech Integration

  20. With All That in Mind…Next Steps • Data Discussions at AC = model best practices • How do district trends look at each site? • What’s working for some teachers? • Continued critical analysis of Programs • Data around usage and student achievement • Professional Development around CCSS Big Ideas • Take the next step • Transition smoothly to CCSS

  21. Questions?

More Related