1 / 4

sos

sos. Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University. Summary. Address convention: sip:sos@local-domain if known sip:sos@aor-domain if not known also: sos. service (e.g., sos.police, sos.fire, sos.rescue) for specific services Should UA translate 911 and 112 to sos ?

cargan
Download Presentation

sos

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. sos Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University 53rd IETF - SIPPING

  2. Summary • Address convention: • sip:sos@local-domain if known • sip:sos@aor-domain if not known • also: sos.service (e.g., sos.police, sos.fire, sos.rescue) for specific services • Should UA translate 911 and 112 to sos? • First proxy that recognizes sos routes to appropriate emergency call center • maybe just use sos@aor-domain always 53rd IETF - SIPPING

  3. Summary of discussion • Out of scope: service behavior • no caller-initiated disconnect  even PSTN can’t do this • call back • Out of scope: finding appropriate emergency call center • likely to be country-specific • currently, proprietary protocols (e.g., Intrado) • but use of universal identifier simplifies UA design: • accidental disconnect prevention • inclusion of location information 53rd IETF - SIPPING

  4. Going forward • Status: WG item? I? BCP? PS? • Unlike service URIs, agreement very helpful • prevent accidental assignment to non-emergency use (e.g., ad-hoc conference) • UA behavior • Informal coordination with NENA transition WG • Consider it ready for WGLC (except for IANA consideration section) 53rd IETF - SIPPING

More Related