1 / 15

Brussels Nov. 16th 2006

ENASP Question of Common Interest Agricultural social protection systems’ financing: Various ways but common challenges?. ENASP – Plenary Meeting. Brussels Nov. 16th 2006. INTRODUCTION. Reminder : about Questions of Common Interest Description :

cardea
Download Presentation

Brussels Nov. 16th 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ENASP Question of Common Interest Agricultural social protection systems’ financing: Various ways but common challenges? ENASP – Plenary Meeting Brussels Nov. 16th 2006

  2. INTRODUCTION • Reminder : about Questions of Common Interest • Description : • A common theme interesting for all of us • Corresponding to an important stake in our systems’ activities • Extending over several experts meetings • Goals : • Information, knowledge of each other • Possibilities: common matters, or support to some members

  3. INTRODUCTION • Analysis of financing: which interest? Ways of financing are very significant about the place and the role of social protection in a country • Which stakes for our systems? • To maintain the same level of social protection on a long term basis • To remain autonomous

  4. A common context: demographic gap • Covered populations: More beneficiaries than active contributors… … Which is characteristic of agricultural populations

  5. Financial Resources • Global level • Contributions are not sufficient • External resources represent an important share ( > 50 %) : • In every countries: State • Stable financings • And / or more insecure financings • In some countries: other social security schemes (most of the time the general scheme)

  6. Financial Resources • Indicative proportions

  7. Financial Resources • Various origins

  8. Institutional and organisational issues • In some countries, the financing system is relatively unified • Some other countries have separate financing systems, by branches or risks  Huge diversity between ENASP members in that field

  9. Flows of money and functioning: Pattern of diagram Benefits Activities Kinds of financing Accountable funds Contributions Extra legal activities: social action, … State subsidies Taxes Management costs Other schemes Etc. Etc.

  10. Example : KRUS (POLAND) Accountable funds Activities Kinds of financing Accidents Health Maternity Premium Contributions Pensions Pensions Management costs Administration State Prevention & Rehabilitation Prevention, rehabilitation… Incentive bonuses Motivation

  11. Place and role of main actors in the financing • Insured people themselves (the covered population may be different according to the country) do not have a huge influence on the process • The State: • Strong interventions because agriculture is a sensitive file and because social protection is a tool of agricultural policy • A « dependence » with some political effects • The other social security schemes: often « difficult » relationships

  12. Stakes and evolutions: which interpretations? • The financing of the whole social protection is questioned • Cf. ALOSS conference • Dependence on external financings • Our agricultural systems share a certain weakness in that field • Specific agricultural systems are often criticised

  13. Stakes and evolutions: which interpretations? • Which solidarity? • Professional solidarity • Interprofessional solidarity (between schemes) • National solidarity • Diversification of resources: Insurance vs. assistance ?

  14. CONCLUSION • A very political subject • A clear link with the question of contribution calculation • A common claim: external financings are not in contradiction to a specific and autonomous management • Financing vs. management-governance? • Europe : an help for our agricultural systems?

  15. END Thank you for your attention !

More Related