1 / 9

Quality Clinical Assessment A Student Perspective

Quality Clinical Assessment A Student Perspective. A. Hutchinson & B. Manoharan University of Queensland Medical Society. MBBS Assessment. Preclinical Year 1 : Theoretical exams, communication skills Year 2: As Year 1, but increased focus on clinical reasoning and clinical skills

caraf
Download Presentation

Quality Clinical Assessment A Student Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quality Clinical Assessment A Student Perspective A. Hutchinson & B. Manoharan University of Queensland Medical Society

  2. MBBS Assessment • Preclinical • Year 1 : Theoretical exams, communication skills • Year 2: As Year 1, but increased focus on clinical reasoning and clinical skills • Clinical Years • Assessment per rotation (mixture of) :Written ( SAQs, MCQs) exams, Viva voce, Structured Clinical Interviews, Structured Long & Short Cases etc. • Barrier MSAT examinations. CMEDRS T&L Conference

  3. Student perceptions on assessment • Assessment as a motivator • Assessment as a learning tool • “studying” for an exam Vs “learning” to be a doctor • Changing perceptions of assessment CMEDRS T&L Conference

  4. How do we achieve quality clinical assessment? • Pre-assessment • Assessment • Post-assessment

  5. Pre-Assessment • Learning objectives • Adequate briefing • Clear understanding of expectations • Formative assessment opportunities

  6. Assessment • Appropriate use of assessment modalities • Range • Consistency • Directed by learning objectives • Tailored for skill level • Consistent / reliable examiners • Learning opportunity

  7. Post-Assessment • Feedback • Remediation • Clear guidelines on resits / remarks / appeal • Evaluation • Quality control • Modification • Student performance • Usefulness

  8. Recommendations • SoM framework of assessment delivery • Standardisation of Delivery • Training and competency of assessors • Training students to be teachers • Assessment as a learning tool • Assessment feedback and Relevance • Consistent information provision re assessment • ?Benchmarking of assessment

  9. A. Hutchinson + B. ManoharanUniversity of Queensland Medical Societywww.uqms.org Thank you

More Related