1 / 14

APEC L ow C arbon T own I ndicator [ APEC LCT-I ] Ver.1 Progress Report

LCMT-TF6-03.2 Agenda Item 3. APEC L ow C arbon T own I ndicator [ APEC LCT-I ] Ver.1 Progress Report. Background. Current situation… The LCMT concept was formed by APEC since 2011 1) F/S of 2 Town’s (Yujiapu, Tianjin, China and Samui, Thailand) are complete

candy
Download Presentation

APEC L ow C arbon T own I ndicator [ APEC LCT-I ] Ver.1 Progress Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LCMT-TF6-03.2 Agenda Item 3 APEC Low CarbonTownIndicator [ APEC LCT-I ]Ver.1 Progress Report

  2. Background Current situation… • The LCMT concept was formed by APEC since 2011 1) F/S of 2 Town’s (Yujiapu, Tianjin, China and Samui, Thailand) are complete 2) F/S of 3rd Town ( Danang, VietNam ) is now in progress • Post Feasibility Study: 1)Yujiapu is now implementing the F/S outputs; 2) Samui continues to study about eco-lifestyle • Realization of LCT is expected to continue in many economies and regions. • But the process of executing LCT varies widely by economy

  3. Purpose In the future, increase in LCT projects in many economies and regions is expected • A uniform methodology is necessary to promote LCT. • Use of LCT-I in projects is desired • [ Propose APEC LCT-I ] • Form comprehensive and integrated LCT Indexes that can • adequately study LC measures • manage project progress of LCT projects by referencing past LCMT outcomes

  4. Principles of APEC LCT-I Study (i)Indicators are simple and easy-to-understand (ii) Indicators reflect the conditions of each economy and project characteristics (iii) Indicators are based on existing APEC LCMT FS outcomes, existing assessment indicators, and international trends

  5. Principles of APEC LCT-I Study Descriptions of Existing LC Towns Low Carbon Town in the APEC by APEC LCMT CONCEPT *1 LCMT Phase I feasibility study *2 LCMT Phase II feasibility study 出典) APEC LCMT CONCEPT *3 Pilot City of WB Eco2 Cities Project * Total population

  6. Applications ofAPEC LCT-I • [How to use APEC LCT-I] • In principle, assessment should be conducted by individual economy. However, assessment by a third party (consulting firm, etc.) is also acceptable. • Each economy shall review and correct low carbon activities based on the assessment findings (PDCA). • Progress shall be evaluated on a regular basis (evaluation frequency shall be determined by each economy). • A third-party review or certification system may be established in future.

  7. Structure ofAPEC LCT-I Image of Low Carbon Town and LC measures

  8. Directly related to CO2 reduction Indirectly related to CO2 reduction Structure ofAPEC LCT-I Areas and measures covered by APEC LCT-I • The appropriate set of low carbon measures or technologies will depend on the size of the areaand the characteristics of the evaluation area. • Evaluation area is set within the LCMT boundary (project boundary, administrative district) Region City Building Block & District Allocating district heating and cooling systems and linking them Untapped energy(sea & river water、waste heat from incinerator)、dispersed power system Renewable energy (PV, Wind Power) Reuse of water & wastes Wind along the canopy Continuous greenery on site Multiple use trench Information network Block plan (with appropriate open space) Rich greenery network to mitigate heat-island impact Appropriate transportation system Higher insulation High-efficiency building services system Use of natural energy (Natural ventilation, day lighting) Reuse of sewage water Greenery on site - Power plant - Gas plant Water supply & sewage Gas supply Electric power supply 出典)APEC LCMT Phase1 report

  9. Structure ofAPEC LCT-I Low carbon categories and measures evaluated by APEC LCT-I Demand Side α Low Carbon Town Structure Transit Oriented Development 1. Town Structure Environment space development Low Carbon Building Reducing heat loads Passive energy design & equipment 2. Buildings Highly efficient equipment & facilities Business EMS Home EMS Factory EMS • 3.Energy Management Systems (EMS) Area EMS Public transportation systems Traffic demand management Low carbon Traffic + 4. Transportation Low Carbon Vehicles & Facilities Supply side Area Energy Network District heating /cooling 5. Area Energy Network Untapped Energy Using sea/river water Using waste heat 6. Untapped Energy 7. Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Demand & Supply Smart Grid Smart energy system • 8. Smart Grid System Additional category : Environment, eco life style, organization and CO2 emission [Reference] The Concept of the Low-Carbon town in the APEC Region

  10. Evaluation Structure of APEC LCT-I Partial List of Evaluation Categories 1) PAL: Perimeter Annual Load 2) ERB: Energy Reduction Rate of Building Equipment

  11. Evaluation Structure of APEC LCT-I • [Structure of Evaluation] • Assessments are performed on individual categories and overall performance. • Assessment results are expressed in 3-scale rating systems, i.e., ★/★★/★★★ (overall) and 1-3 point (category). • Evaluation criteria for each category can be set by individual economies • Score of individual category is calculated based on the aggregate performance of sub-items; overall score of the LCT is the average score of individual categories. ⑧organization ①urban structure ⑦eco life style ②architecture ③EMS ⑥environment Minimum level for economy Standard level for economy ④transportation ⑤energy Ideal level for economy

  12. Study Flow (1)Examination of existing low carbon, energy efficiency and smart city indicators CurrentStudy Phase (2)Examinationof management indicator system structure   ① Examination of scope of management indicator system   ② Examination of evaluation field and indicators   ③ Examination of quantitative (or qualitative) evaluation method (3)Sensitivity analysis of management indicators  ① Selection of target cities for evaluation studies   ② Execution of evaluation studies and sensitive analysis (4)External activities for the creation of management indicators (5)Preparationof report

  13. Analysis sample Clarification point of view : Ease of evaluation & Ease of data collection Suffix : ABC Index (Number of indexes, Number of Output evaluation Items ) List Type Rating System (large) ⑧Smart City Index(57,57) ⑩European Initiative on Smart Cities (N/A) ⑤Global City Indicators(53, 53) Ease of Understanding (volume of information from evaluation results) ⑫Yujiapu(35, 35) ⑨Reference Framework for Sustainable Cities(33, 33) ⑦Tianjin Eco-city (26, 26) Simple and easy-to-understand indicators ④Green Growth Indicators (20, 20) ③CASBEE-City(38, 5) ②CASBEE-Town(82, 5) ⑪J-CODE(53, 3) ①LEED-ND (110, 4) Star Type Rating System (small) ⑥Green City Index(30, 1) Easy (less) Difficult(more) Ease of Data Collection(Number of indexes)

  14. Thank you for your attention We are studying continuously!

More Related