1 / 67

Golestani et al., Cerebral Cortex , 2006

Golestani et al., Cerebral Cortex , 2006. Psycholinguistics I. LING 640. Today. Goals of the course Integrative overview of psycholinguistics Recurring themes Practical skills Practical information Specialization & Abstraction Introducing Lab #1. www.ling.umd.edu/~colin/readings. OR

candie
Download Presentation

Golestani et al., Cerebral Cortex , 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Golestani et al., Cerebral Cortex, 2006

  2. Psycholinguistics I LING 640

  3. Today • Goals of the course • Integrative overview of psycholinguistics • Recurring themes • Practical skills • Practical information • Specialization & Abstraction • Introducing Lab #1

  4. www.ling.umd.edu/~colin/readings OR www.ling.umd.edu/colin/readings Username: linguser Password: aspects

  5. What is psycholinguistics about?

  6. From Cellsto Syntax

  7. Sensory Maps Internal representations of the outside world. Cellular neuroscience has discovered a great deal in this area.

  8. The mind/brain’s view of the body body parts scaled to area in brain: somatosensory homunculus

  9. Guiding Questions • What do speakers of a language mentally represent? • How did those representations get there? • How are those representations constructed? • How are those representations encoded?

  10. Language is a Human Specialization • Species specificity • Within-species invariance • Spontanous development, insensitivity to input • Independence of general intelligence • Selective brain damage • The ‘Language Instinct’ [Pinker 1994]; see Gleitman & Newport chapter [readings] for nice summary • These arguments suggest that there’s a coherent object of study, but tell us very little about its form

  11. We need explicit answers… • What do speakers of a language mentally represent? • How did those representations get there? • How are those representations constructed? • How are those representations encoded?

  12. Explicit models quickly reveal surprising complexity

  13. A Simple(-ish) Example • Distribution of pronouns/reflexives • John likes him/himself. • John thinks that Mary likes him/himself. • Infinitival clauses • John appeared to Bill to like himself. • John appeared to Bill to like him. • But… • John appealed to Bill to like himself. • John appealed to Bill to like him. • Abstract solution… • Johni appealed to Billj [PROj to like himselfj ]

  14. Abstraction is a double-edged sword

  15. Abstraction • Abstraction is valuable • Provides representational power • Provides representational freedom • Provides an efficient code • Abstraction is costly • Linguistic representations are more distant from experience • This places a burden on the learner - motivation for innate knowl. • This places a burden on comprehension/production systems • … and it makes it harder to know what to look for in the brain

  16. Abstraction and Learning

  17. Abstraction and Learning • Must ensure easy learning of any human language • Learner must project from finite input to a system with infinite expressive power

  18. typology problem =learning problem N. Chomsky Principles & Parameters program (1980s)

  19. Who do you think John likes __? Who do you think that John likes __? Who do you think __ likes John? Who do you think that __ likes John? that-trace effect English * French * Spanish ok Italian ok Levantine Ar. * Beni-Hassan Ar. ok Post-verbal subject position ‘Telephoned John.’ Who do you think that likes John __?

  20. typology problem =learning problem Challenges… Link all hard-to-observe facts to easy-to-observe phenomena Find reliable parameters of variation in the face of microvariation Find a reliable learning procedure Show evidence of abstract inference in learning Principles & Parameters program (1980s)

  21. statistical learning! Elissa Newport Challenges… Learning is closely tied to experience Robust learning procedures available, noise sensitive Evidence of learning available Almost nothing to say about hard-to-observe phenomena Little to say about typological consistency

  22. Abstraction, Sounds, and Concepts

  23. “It has sometimes been argued that linguistic theory must meet the empirical condition that it account for the ease and rapidity of parsing. But parsing does not, in fact, have these properties. […] In general, it is not the case that language is readily usable or ‘designed for use.’” (Chomsky & Lasnik, 1993, p. 18)

  24. Translating Representations • We can show that comprehension and production are, in fact, rapid and accurate • Entails a need to quickly translate between codes • Sounds abstract stuff Concepts • Similar arguments apply as in learning: abstraction carries a cost

  25. Abstraction and Encoding

  26. From Cellsto Syntax

  27. Linguistic Theories • Classify (im)possible expressions • Emphasize complex hierarchical structures • Representations are symbolic and abstract • Rich cross-language variation • Typically disavow claims about real-timeoperations

  28. Human Brain • 100 billion neurons • Vast numbers of connections (synapses) • Rich cytoarchitectonicdiversity • Cortex and sub-corticalneuclei • Signaling: electrical and chemical; analogand digital

  29. Sensory Maps Internal representations of the outside world. Cellular neuroscience has discovered a great deal in this area.

  30. The mind/brain’s view of the body body parts scaled to area in brain: somatosensory homunculus

  31. www.ling.umd.edu/~colin/readings

  32. Acoustic Continua andPhonetic Categories

  33. Frequency - Tones

  34. Frequency - Tones

  35. Frequency - Tones

  36. Frequency - Tones

  37. Frequency - Complex Sounds

  38. Frequency - Complex Sounds

  39. Frequency - Vowels • Vowels combine acoustic energy at a number of different frequencies • Different vowels ([a], [i], [u] etc.) contain acoustic energy at different frequencies • Listeners must perform a ‘frequency analysis’ of vowels in order to identify them(Fourier Analysis)

  40. Frequency - Male Vowels

  41. Frequency - Male Vowels

  42. Frequency - Female Vowels

  43. Frequency - Female Vowels

  44. Synthesized Speech • Allows for precise control of sounds • Valuable tool for investigating perception

  45. Timing - Voicing

  46. Voice Onset Time (VOT) 60 msec

  47. English VOT production • Not uniform • 2 categories

  48. Perceiving VOT ‘Categorical Perception’

  49. Discrimination Same/Different

More Related