1 / 21

Potential Benefits of an RPS in Vermont

Potential Benefits of an RPS in Vermont. Mark Bolinger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MABolinger@lbl.gov (603.795.4937) VT RPS Collaborative Meeting Montpelier, VT October 1, 2003. Potential Benefits of an RPS. Mitigates Fuel Price Risk

cana
Download Presentation

Potential Benefits of an RPS in Vermont

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Potential Benefits ofan RPS in Vermont Mark Bolinger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MABolinger@lbl.gov (603.795.4937) VT RPS Collaborative Meeting Montpelier, VT October 1, 2003 Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  2. Potential Benefits of an RPS • Mitigates Fuel Price Risk • Reduces Natural Gas Prices (to all sectors) • Reduces Wholesale Power Prices (through “bid stack effect”) • Displaces Emissions & Mitigates Future Environmental Compliance Risk • Promotes Local Economic Development Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  3. Gas Prices Have Increased Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  4. Gas Price Volatility Has Increased Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  5. Gas Contributes to Electricity Price Volatility • The cost of natural gas accounts for more than half the levelized cost of new gas-fired generation, and more than 90% of operating costs • Gas-fired “peakers” often set the market clearing price in New England • VT currently not all that exposed to wholesale market…still true in 10 years? Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  6. to to LBNL’s Accounting for Fuel Price Risk… Question: How to compare fixed-price renewable to variable-price gas-fired generation? • Current Practice: • Cost of renewables is often compared to cost of gas-fired generation based on uncertain fuel price forecasts • Best Practice: • Cost of renewables should be compared to cost of gas-fired generation based on a guaranteed fuel price How do guaranteed forward gas prices compare to uncertain gas price forecasts?? Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  7. Swap Prices Exceed Price Forecasts Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  8. Swap Prices Exceed Price Forecasts Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  9. Futures Prices Exceed Price Forecasts Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  10. Physical Prices Exceed Price Forecasts Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  11. Premiums Range from $0.4-0.8/MMBtu Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  12. Implications • Whether these premiums represent “hedge value” or something else (e.g., biased forecasts) is debatable, but does not change implications: Use forward prices, not forecasts, when comparing gas-fired to renewable generation • Synapse VT cost analysis captured some of this: • Used current NYMEX strip as the basis for the 2010 gas price input to the combined-cycle COE calculation • But did not account for fuel prices beyond 2010… • Ideally, would just use long-term wholesale electricity forwards (if they existed) Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  13. Potential Benefits of an RPS • Mitigates Fuel Price Risk • Reduces Natural Gas Prices (to all sectors) • Reduces Wholesale Power Prices (through “bid stack effect”) • Displaces Emissions & Mitigates Future Environmental Compliance Risk • Promotes Local Economic Development Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  14. Renewables Displace Natural Gas Theory: As renewables displace gas-fired generation, demand for natural gas declines, and the price of gas falls Inverse elasticities range from –0.1 to +4.0, averaging +1.7 (estimate from literature is +1.25) Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  15. Quantifying the Impact LBNL’s “Simplified Method” (for NEMS): • Survey implicit inverse price elasticity of supply from model output and economics literature • Study relationship between wellhead and delivered price changes, both nationally and regionally • Inject renewables in each NEMS region to determine what they displace With this basic information, we can get a rough idea of the impact of a state RPS on regional gas prices (without having to run the model!) Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  16. VT RPS May Reduce NE Gas Prices Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  17. Potential Benefits of an RPS • Mitigates Fuel Price Risk • Reduces Natural Gas Prices (to all sectors) • Reduces Wholesale Power Prices (through “bid stack effect”) • Displaces Emissions & Mitigates Future Environmental Compliance Risk • Promotes Local Economic Development Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  18. Bid Stack Effect Theory: Renewables with low operating costs will bump higher-cost marginal resources out of the “bid stack,” leading to lower clearing prices • 2 studies of NY RPS measure this: • Joint Utilities: -$1/MWh by 2013 • NYSERDA: -$1.3/MWh by 2013 • Synapse VT cost analysis does not account for potential changes in bid stack Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  19. Environmental (Air Quality) “Cap and trade” programs for SO2 and NOX cloud the picture: • Emissions displaced by renewables may simply be “added” elsewhere (to get back to the cap) • While total emissions may therefore remain at the cap, the cost of compliance should be lower Also reduces risk of future envtl regs (e.g., carbon tax)! Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  20. Economic Development • Synapse NY study (for RETEC) provides a good survey of the literature; REV has its own VT-specific analysis • Note: Most economic development studies to date pertain to wind development, but Synapse VT RPS analysis shows biomass and hydro may dominate…applicability? Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

  21. References • La Capra, Sustainable Energy Advantage (SEA). 2000. Massachusetts Renewable Portfolio Standard Cost Analysis Report. • ICF Consulting (for Joint Utilities). 2003. Report of Initial Analysis of Proposed New York RPS. • NYSDPS, NYSERDA, SEA, La Capra. 2003. New York Renewable Portfolio Standard Cost Study Report. • Synapse (for RETEC). 2003. Cleaner Air, Fuel Diversity, and High-Quality Jobs: Reviewing Selected Potential Benefits of an RPS in New York State. • ACEEE (with EEA). 2003. Impacts of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy on Natural Gas Markets. • LBNL. 2003. Accounting for Fuel Price Risk: Using Forward Natural Gas Prices Instead of Gas Price Forecasts to Compare Renewable to Natural Gas-Fired Generation • Tellus. 2002. Modeling Analysis: Renewable Portfolio Standards for the Rhode Island GHG Action Plan. • A number of national studies by EIA and UCS Environmental Energy Technologies Division • Energy Analysis Department

More Related