1 / 34

The effectiveness of buprenorphine in treating opioid addiction

The effectiveness of buprenorphine in treating opioid addiction. Skylee Campbell. Outline. Background Opioid vs opiate Brief history Treatment Conclusions. Opioid Statistics. Background Opioid vs opiate Brief history Treatment Conclusions.

cameo
Download Presentation

The effectiveness of buprenorphine in treating opioid addiction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The effectiveness of buprenorphine in treating opioid addiction • Skylee Campbell

  2. Outline • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions

  3. Opioid Statistics • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Increased abuse of prescription opioids and non-medical opioids • Increase in • Admission rate to substance abuse treatment programs • Opioid-related overdose • Opioid-induced mortality Wu, Woody, Yang and Blazer (2010)

  4. Increased Mortality Rates • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • 3 main factors: • (1) Direct effects on health • e.g., cardiac arrhythmias, respiratory failure • (2) Indirect effects via exposure • e.g., non-sterile injection equipment • (3) Environmental factors • e.g., suicide, advanced exposure to violence, • poor lifestyle choices, accidents Hulse, English, Milne, & Holman (1999)

  5. Opioid Statistics • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Highest misused drugs in the United States • Lifetime prevalence: 1.7 % of every 19-30 year old has tried heroin • 18.7 % have used other opioids (such as Vicodin and OxyContin) Wu, Woody, Yang, & Blazer (2010) Veilleux, Colvin, Anderson, York & Heinz (2009)

  6. Younger Generations • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Increase in non-medical prescription opioids • Average age is 21.2 • Most popular prescription drug is Vicodin Veilleux, Colvin, Anderson, York, & Heinz (2009)

  7. Location • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Prescription drugs: more in urban and rural areas rather than large cities • Possible reasons: • - Heroin not as available as prescription drugs • - Prescription drugs more socially acceptable • - Easier to attain and cheaper Cicero, Surratt, & Inciardi, (2007)

  8. Gender Differences • Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Women are more likely than men to: • - initiate opioid use via prescription opioids • - use for indicated use • - Less likely to seek treatment for an opioid use disorder McHugh, DeVito, Dodd, Carroll, Potter, Greenfield, Connery & Weiss, (2013)

  9. Opiate vs. Opioid • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Opiate • Natural origin, made from opium (Papaver somniferum) • Examples • - Morphine • - Codeine • - Thebaine Renner & Levounis (2011)

  10. Opiate vs. Opioid • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Opioid • Opiate-like drugs • Basic subgroups • (1) Semisynthetic e.g., heroin, oxycodone, and buprenorphine • (2) Synthetic: e.g., methadone and other medical prescription drugs in opioid group Renner & Levounis (2011)

  11. Abuse Potential • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Many opiates and opioids have a high abuse potential • A drug will have a higher abuse potential if: • - Route of administration is quicker • Injection > Oral • - Shorter half-life e.g., Heroin vs. Methadone • - Higher lipophilic properties • Faster route across blood-brain barrier Renner & Levounis (2011)

  12. History • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Opium • - Produced from poppy: Papaver somniferum • - 10 % morphine, 0.5 % codeine, lower % of thebaine McKim & Hancock (2013)

  13. History of Opium • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • 6th millenium BCE in the Western Mediterranean region • Written reference to opium “joy plant” • Spread to Middle East, North Africa, India, and China • Primarily used as medicine, BUT also mentioned non-medical, more enjoyable properties McKim & Hancock (2013)

  14. History • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Opiate: Morphine • Frederick Serturner • Isolated morphine from opium • 1830s: Manufactured and sold commercially • Raise for concern when people became addicted • Too available McKim & Hancock (2013)

  15. History • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Opiate: Codeine • Pierre J. Robiquet • Used new process of isolating morphine • Discovered codeine • Prescription currently legal in U.S. McKim & Hancock (2013)

  16. History • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Opiate: Thebaine • Not used for therapeutic purposes • Used for semisynthetic opioids • Examples • - Percocet • - Percodan • - OxyContin (oxycodone) McKim & Hancock (2013)

  17. History • Background • Opioid vs opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions • Opioid: Heroin • Discovered in 1874 as first semisynthetic form of opioid • More lipid soluble than morphine • Originally seen as not as addictive McKim & Hancock (2013)

  18. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Treatment Considerations • Mu receptor • Full agonist • Antagonists • Partial agonist Renner & Levounis (2011)

  19. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Treatment Considerations • Full Agonist • Prescription opioids • Morphine • Heroin • Methadone Renner & Levounis (2011)

  20. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Treatment Considerations • Antagonist • Do not produce any opioid effects • Naloxone: • - Reverses effects of opioids • Naltrexone: • - Blocks agonist from binding to mu receptor Renner & Levounis (2011)

  21. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Treatment Considerations • Partial Agonist • Buprenorphine • - Longer half-life • - Can relieve opioid and opiate withdrawal symptoms Renner & Levounis (2011)

  22. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Buprenorphine • Originally developed in the 1970s • Developed because • - Opioid addiction is costly to the government • - Methadone treatment had many associatedlimitations Renner & Levounis (2011)

  23. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Buprenorphine • Administration Routes • Subutex form • Administered orally • Buprenorphine alone • Suboxone form • Administered orally • Mix of buprenorphine/naloxone • (3) Implants • (4) Injections Renner & Levounis (2011)

  24. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Buprenorphine Implants • Implant = polymetric matrix composed of ethylene vinyl acetate and buprenorphine • Advantages • (1) Delivers buprenorphine over 6 months • - Initial pulse release  constant, low level of buprenorphine released • (2) To address problems with adherence and nonmedical use (Ling, Casadonte, Bigelow, Kampman, Patkar, Bailey, Rosenthal & Beebe, 2010)

  25. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Buprenorphine Injections • Produces a gradual release of buprenorphine • Advantages • Gradual opioid detoxification with minimal withdrawal symptoms • Reduces frequency of clinic visits • Eliminates need for take-home medication (Sigmon, Wong, Chausmer, Liebson & Bigelow, 2004)

  26. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Buprenorphine -naloxone • Adding naloxone discourages parenteral use BUTpreserves the therapeutic effect on opiate addiction when used sublingually as intended (Harris, Jones, Welm, Upton, Lin & Mendelson, 2000)

  27. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Gender Differences • No significant gender differences in treatment outcome indicators including: • Maximum daily dose of buprenorphine–naloxone • Achievement of a successful opioid treatment outcome • Treatment retention (Kelly, Schwartz, O'Grady, Mitchell, Reisinger, Peterson, Agar & Barry, 2009)

  28. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Conclusions • Advantages of Buprenorphine • Partial agonist • Improved overall safety margin • Long-lasting effect • Reduces severity of withdrawal Renner & Levounis (2011)

  29. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions Conclusions • Disadavantages of Buprenorphine • Concern of abuse • Need to be aware of potential for abuse Cicero, Surratt, Inciardi, & Munoz (2007)

  30. Background • Opioid vs. opiate • Brief history • Treatment • Conclusions “Holy Grail of Opioid Research” • STILL in search for drug that has same analgesic effects of morphine but does NOT have side effects such as addiction • Developed thousands of new opioids • All have addictive properties • Have NOT found perfect drug McKim & Hancock (2013)

  31. Acknowledgments • Conference organizers • Behavioral Science Department • Drs. David Yells and Richard Nance • Dr. Claudia Lieberwirth

  32. References • Cicero, T. J., Surratt, H. L., & Inciardi, J. (2007). Use and misuse of buprenorphine in the management of opioid addiction. Journal of Opioid Management , 3(6), 1-7. • Harris, D. S., Jones, R. T., Welm, S., Upton, R. A., Lin, E., & Mendelson, J. (2000). Buprenorphine and naloxone co-administration in opiate-dependent patients stabilized on sublingual buprenorphine. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 61, 85-94. doi: S0376-8716(00)00126-5 • McHugh, R. K., DeVito, E. E., Dodd, D., Carroll, K. M., Potter, J. S., Greenfield, S. F., Connery, H. S., & Weiss, R. D. (2013). Gender differences in a clinical trial for prescription opioid dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 45, 38-43. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.12.007 • Hulse, G. K., English, D. R., Milne, E., & Holman, C. D. J. (1999). The quantification of mortality resulting from the regular use of illicit opiates. Society for the Study of Addiction and Other Drugs, 94(2), 221-229. doi: 0965-2140/99/020221-09 • Kelly, S. M., Schwartz, R. P., O'Grady, K. E., Mitchell, S. G., Reisinger, H. S., Peterson, J. A., Agar, M. H., & Barry, B. S. (2009). Gender differences among in- and out-of-treatment opioid-addicted individuals. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 35, 38-42. doi: 10.1080/00952990802342915

  33. References • Ling, W., Casadonte, P., Bigelow, G., Kampman, K. M., Patkar, A., Bailey, G. L., Rosenthal, R. N., & Beebe, K. L. (2010). Buprenorphine implants for treatment of opioid dependence: A randomized controlled trial. American Medical Association, 304(14), 1576-1582. Retrieved from http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ • McKim, W. A., & Hancock, S. D. (2013). Drugs and behavior: An introduction to behavioral pharmacology. (7th ed., pp. 255-276). New Jersey: Pearson.) • Renner, J. A., & Levounis, P. (2011). Handbook of office-based buprenorphine treatment of opioid dependence. (1st ed.). Virginia: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. • Sigmon, S. C., Wong, C. J., Chausmer, A. L., Liebson, I. A., & Bigelow, G. E. (2004). Evaluation of an injection depot formulation of buprenorphine: placebo comparison. Society for the Study of Addiction, 99, 1439-1449. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00834.x • Veilleux, J. C., Colvin, P. J., Anderson, J., York, C., & Heinz, A. J. (2010). A review of opioid dependence treatment: Pharmacological and psychosocial interventions to treat opioid addiction. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 155-166. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.10.006 • Wu, L., Woody, G. E., Yang, C., & Blazer, D. G. (2010). Subtypes of nonmedical opioid users: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 112, 69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.013

  34. Questions?

More Related