Terrestrial planet formation the formation of a water rich earth
Download
1 / 22

TERRESTRIAL PLANET FORMATION THE FORMATION OF A WATER-RICH EARTH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 145 Views
  • Uploaded on

TERRESTRIAL PLANET FORMATION & THE FORMATION OF A WATER-RICH EARTH. A. Morbidelli Observatoire de la C ô te d’Azur. OUTLINE. Reasons to believe that water was accreted from more distant regions in the protoplanetary disk Cometary or asteroidal sources?

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'TERRESTRIAL PLANET FORMATION THE FORMATION OF A WATER-RICH EARTH' - cale


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Terrestrial planet formation the formation of a water rich earth

TERRESTRIAL PLANET FORMATION& THE FORMATION OF A WATER-RICH EARTH

A. Morbidelli

Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur


OUTLINE

  • Reasons to believe that water was accreted from more distant regions in the protoplanetary disk

  • Cometary or asteroidal sources?

  • A model for the delivery of water from the asteroid belt

  • Advantages

  • water aboundance

  • chronology of water accretion

  • stochasticity and diversity of terrestrial planets

  • Drawbacks & ways out

    • Siderophile elements in Earth’s mantle

    • Oxygen isotope compostion of Earth and Moon


The evident gradient of relative water content with heliocentric distance implies that water should have been accreted from distant material.


ASTEROIDS OR COMETS? heliocentric distance implies that water should have been accreted from distant material.

The D/H ratio of Earth’s water rules out a dominant contribution of comets and suggests an asteroidal origin

Numerical integrations also show that comets could have contributed at most 10% of the current water on Earth Levison et al. (2000); Morbidelli et al. (2000)

Courtesy of F. Robert


To understand the delivery of water from asteroids we need a model for the primordial depletion and dynamical excitation of the main belt.

We believe that the best model to date is the one proposed by Wetherill 1992, and simulated in detail by Petit, Morbidelli and Chambers 2001.

This model `fits’ the framework of Terrestrial planet accretion.





This model explains quantitatively the main properties of the current belt

Petit et al. (2001)


WATER FROM ASTEROIDS the current belt

According to our asteroid belt sculpting scenario, only 0.1% of the “primitive” asteroids would have been accreted by the Earth. Assuming 1 Earth mass of material and 10% water content this amounts to only 20% of the water currently on Earth. Moreover it arrived “early” in the Earth formation history.

Morbidelli et al. (2000)


WATER FROM EMBRYOS the current belt

Raymond et al., 2004


WATER FROM EMBRYOS the current belt

We did 11 simulations of terrestrial planet accretion, forming in total 24 planets.

In 2/3 of the cases a terrestrial planet accretes at least one embryo coming from the outer asteroid belt.

We expect that 5 to 20 times the current amount of Earth’s water could be accreted in this way.

Morbidelli et al. (2000)


The accretion of the water rich embryo occurs DURING the formation of the Earth, although towards the end.

NOT a LATE VENEER scenario

Morbidelli et al., 2000


Advantages
ADVANTAGES formation of the Earth, although towards the end.

  • We explain the accretion of a LARGE amount of water

  • The accreted water has the correct D/H ratio, being of carbonaceous chondritic origin

  • The water accretion occurs DURING the formation of the Earth, NOT in a late veneer phase, in agreement with geochemical modelling

  • This mechanism for water accretion seems generic: confirmed by Levison and Agnor (2003) and Raymond, Quinn, Lunine (2004)

  • The accretion of the water is a stochastic event, and therefore explains why not all terrestrial planets had an identical primitive water budget (e.g.Mars)


Stochasticity in the resulting water budget formation of the Earth, although towards the end.

Raymond et al., 2004


A large ecc. of Jupiter inhibits the delivery of water to the inner S.S.

Chambers, 2001; Raymond et al., 2004


Problems from drake and righter nature 416 39
PROBLEMS the inner S.S.(from Drake and Righter, Nature 416, 39)

A carbonaceous embryo carrying enough water to the Earth would also carry too many siderophile elements with respect to what is retained in the upper mantle

Possible solutions:

Siderophile elements are distributed in the whole mantle; no significant water losses occurred after the delivery; the mantle of the water carrying embryo was depleted in siderophiles due to partial differentiation

  • Siderophiles/water in the Upper mantle


Problems from drake and righter nature 416 391
PROBLEMS the inner S.S.(from Drake and Righter, Nature 416, 39)

The Earth and the Moon are at the same position on the same fractionation line. It should be different if the Earth got the water from a carbonaceous embryo.

However, this is a general problem, not specifically related to the origin of water…

  • Oxygen isotope composition


The Moon-forming impact. the inner S.S.

SPH simulations by Canup and Asphaugh

~80% of the Moon forming material comes from the impactor.

The similarity between Earth and Moon therefore implies the similarity between the Earth and the impactor


Independently of the water origin problem, in the current Moon formation scenario, the similarity between Earth and Moon is a problem

The simulations show that terrestrial planet accretion is a heterogeneous process

This explains the diversity among the terrestrial planets…

But the similarity between the Earth and the impactor would be due to chance

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

Semimajor axis

(Chambers 2001)


A possible solution Moon formation scenario, the similarity between Earth and Moon is a problem: EQUILIBRATION!

from Stevenson, KITP meeting, march 15-19, 2004


CONCLUSIONS Moon formation scenario, the similarity between Earth and Moon is a problem

  • The delivery of water from the asteroid belt is a natural outcome of terrestrial accretion and asteroid belt primordial sculpting.

  • It is a stochastic process, which may explains the large differences existing among the terrestrial planets

  • It is a robust process, that works in a variety of Solar System configurations, and is inhibited mainly by the large eccentricities of the giant planets.

  • A number of issues concerning the chemistry of the Earth are still open.

  • In particular, more work is needed in order to understand the puzzling similarities between the Earth and the Moon.


ad